Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Civil UAVs:  The Future is Coming Fast >

Civil UAVs: The Future is Coming Fast

Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Civil UAVs: The Future is Coming Fast

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2012, 06:47 PM
  #81  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,012
Default

Thank goodness for Delta's outsourcing. For a minute, I was afraid UAV's would take my job, but then I realized. UAV's will take the jobs of Virgin, Air France, KLM, Alaska Airlines, Jet Blue, Express Jet, Freedom, Pinnacle, Garuda, Aeroflot, Aerolineas, Aeromexico, Air Europa, Alitalia, China Airlines, China Eastern, China Southern, Czech Airlines, Kenya Airways, Korean Air, Middle East Airlines, Saudia, TAROM, Vietnam Airlines, and Xiamen Air pilots.

Boomer and I meanwhile will already be on the front pew at the Church of the Painful Truth.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 07:34 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,943
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Thank goodness for Delta's outsourcing. For a minute, I was afraid UAV's would take my job, but then I realized. UAV's will take the jobs of Virgin, Air France, KLM, Alaska Airlines, Jet Blue, Express Jet, Freedom, Pinnacle, Garuda, Aeroflot, Aerolineas, Aeromexico, Air Europa, Alitalia, China Airlines, China Eastern, China Southern, Czech Airlines, Kenya Airways, Korean Air, Middle East Airlines, Saudia, TAROM, Vietnam Airlines, and Xiamen Air pilots.

Boomer and I meanwhile will already be on the front pew at the Church of the Painful Truth.
One Great UAV Airline!
contrails is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 09:07 PM
  #83  
On Reserve
 
Agflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: C-17 Reserve Bum
Posts: 23
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
And who's to say we can't develop that technology? How do you think robots work?
Sentient machines will remain in the realm of science fiction for the foreseeable future. And even if the ability did develop, do we really want to entrust a computer to make life-altering decisions?
Agflyer is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 09:13 PM
  #84  
On Reserve
 
Agflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: C-17 Reserve Bum
Posts: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Gearjerk View Post
Johnso,

Said I would answer your questions, so here you go:



The exact same way you do when taxiing around ORD, JFK, and ATL; via the yellow line.




Control via Line-of-Sight operations is much more responsive than Satellite signal operations.



I'm not going to speculate "what the CIA wants or doesn't want", but it's not really their decision.



Altitude loss! (Most UAV's are single engine.) Serious note - there are multiple sensors and warnings displayed at the control station giving much more Situational Awareness (SA) about engine parameters and health than anything I've seen in the manned assets.



YES.



Vague question, but security on the base where I/we fly is higher than any civilian flight operation, governed/secured by the "Tub Stacking Association" (TSA).




By having Scarlett Johansson play the role of the pilot in the next movie instead of that Denzel Washington guy.



Tax payers. (Disclaimer: I voted against the guy, but I'm part of the 48% of the popular vote that wanted a better America for my kids.)



YES.



Good question. My fiancee is a lawyer. I won't diminish her profession, but simply put, there are those that can be persuaded to argue whichever side is paying the biggest dollar for them to argue. (Translation: It's not up to the lawyers.)

Thanks for the questions.
The FAA doesn't agree with your assessment of civilian UAVs operating in national airspace. Seems they have a problem with that whole 'see and avoid' concept, or lack thereof in the case of UAVs, even with ground based human operators. You and I both know that current video resolution is not adequate to satisfy that requirement; that is why the unmanned industry is trying to get 'sense and avoid' passed.
Agflyer is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 02:00 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,520
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post

Boomer and I meanwhile will already be on the front pew at the Church of the Painful Truth.
Wakeup call is at 9. Breakfast is served until noon.
Boomer is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 05:04 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RhinoPherret's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

Branson just released a presser stating that he has hired George Jetson and Mr. Spaceley to head up VX’s UAV division.

Branson then stated: “There’s only one thing worse than war and that is business.” He then promptly declared; JESTON. YOU’RE FIRED!

P.S. If you know what these names correspond with, you probably previously flew 727 and DC-9s....sigh
RhinoPherret is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 05:14 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Elliot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: "Prof" button manipulator
Posts: 1,685
Default

The FAA doesn't agree with your assessment of civilian UAVs operating in national airspace.
UAV's are already operating in the NAS. My assessment doesn't matter when the operations are already being performed.

The FAA is an antiquated bureaucracy, often times likened to a time warp, whereas when a person walks into their offices, they're surrounded by corduroy & polyester. They don't make these decisions on their own. They're direction is given to them by whoever's pockets are being padded the most in our non-dysfunctional (sarcasm) administration.

I blame the FAA for the return of the fashion statement of bell bottom pants.



Seems they have a problem with that whole 'see and avoid' concept, or lack thereof in the case of UAVs, even with ground based human operators.
Of course they do, again, because their stuck on the fact that "see & avoid" is the only option of separating two "air vehicles" in this day & age of technology. "Welcome to 2013 FAA."

You and I both know that current video resolution is not adequate to satisfy that requirement;
Wrong. I'm not going to argue this statement & give away what might be taken as Classified information, but if you have any association with the community, you know that the video resolution capability is there to "see" other airplanes. Now your just sounding like 80Kts; spewing conjecture on a public forum you've convinced yourself to be fact.

that is why the unmanned industry is trying to get 'sense and avoid' passed.
The "industry" is trying to get "sense & avoid" passed for many reasons, the most important reason is it being the safest method of deconfliction of two vehicles in congested airspace. How many times have you detected an encroaching a/c on TCAS before actually seeing it? Again, thank the FAA for living in the 70's.

GJ
Elliot is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 05:18 AM
  #88  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

First it was video conferencing, that put us out of business. Then FaceTime put us out of business because everyone had it. Uav's put us out of business the next time.

Until Scotty gets the teleporter fixed, I'm not gonna bother calling truck master.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 05:25 AM
  #89  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,012
Default

Originally Posted by Gearjerk View Post
How many times have you detected an encroaching a/c on TCAS before actually seeing it? Again, thank the FAA for living in the 70's.

GJ
Answer, nearly always at the speeds and 24/7 nature of my flying. In fact, I think enough of the technology to have spent tens of thousands of dollars to add this to the last three airplanes I've used for small business / personal use. It is PARTICULARLY useful for VFR flying in a semi quick, semi complicated aircraft where the pilot does not have the safety provided by ATC services.

When we first got this technology it astonished me how many airplanes were there, unseen. Further, some types have much better visibility than others. A Mooney with a large 6 CYL and tons of avionics does not have a lot of outward visibility.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 05:45 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Gearjerk -

You should get out of your current business and come on over to the FAA's UAS Integration Office.
Sounds like you have all the answers to the complex problems associated with integrating UASs into the NAS on a WIDE scale and could save the organization AND the nation BILLIONS of dollars!

This is the link to the article that I mentioned earlier in the thread.
Invasion of the Drones | Flying Magazine

USMCFLYR
(Who happens to be wearing cargo pants today )
USMCFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dvhighdrive88
United
56
11-13-2012 06:15 AM
UASIT
Military
22
01-05-2012 01:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices