Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Is B-1900 quality Captain time for a Resume? >

Is B-1900 quality Captain time for a Resume?

Search
Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Is B-1900 quality Captain time for a Resume?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2011, 10:37 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 690
Default Is B-1900 quality Captain time for a Resume?

Is B-1900 quality Captain time for a Resume? Much benefit on paper getting TurboFan PIC over Turboprop?

If I have 2600 hours Part 121 Embraer 145 SIC. And 1000 hours PIC in a B-1900 Part 121, is it considered "quality" flight time when moving on to majors?

How about flying B-1900 out of FLL to Bahamas with no icing experience? How about flying out of Cleveland or Billings MT as a B-1900 PIC in wintry conditions. Any benefit over the other when it comes to a Major reviewing the Resume?

How has the experience been moving onto Majors for GIA ( 3M ) and GLA ( ZK ) Captains on B-1900's ?

How about a SF340B+ PIC Part 121 time with 2500 hours of Part 121 TurboFan? Thank you for sharing your experience.

I am considering leaving my current employer to a Part 121 carrier hiring street Captains.
bgmann is offline  
Old 11-11-2011, 02:03 PM
  #2  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,732
Default

PIC turbine is PIC turbine. I have no jet PIC nor did I fly a RJ (by choice). I have about 6500 hours in a SF340 with 1300 of that PIC.

It was good enough. The PIC turbine is great but you'll need a good network to help when a company is looking at thousands of apps and picking a few.
Swedish Blender is offline  
Old 11-11-2011, 03:29 PM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

If it is 121 time some majors (notably SWA) will consider you the same as an RJ captain. Others will prefer jet/glass time.

If it's not 121 time it is not quit as useful, but that goes for jet time as well.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-13-2011, 09:55 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 690
Default

Is SF340 P121 time much better on the resume than a B1900 P121 in the mind of a Major airline recruiter reviewing the application?
bgmann is offline  
Old 11-13-2011, 12:51 PM
  #5  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by bgmann View Post
Is SF340 P121 time much better on the resume than a B1900 P121 in the mind of a Major airline recruiter reviewing the application?
Probably not, but I have seen some airlines specify MGW > 20,000 lbs.

340 and EMB 120 is good enough, but 1900 is not by this measure.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blue34
Flight Schools and Training
20
04-14-2011 08:48 AM
WingsNthings
Part 91 and Low Time
23
01-11-2011 06:04 PM
Grumble
Major
10
11-11-2010 11:30 AM
daytonaflyer
Regional
17
01-13-2006 09:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices