FDXLAG

I'll let you know who is right in 50 years.

flyfish

I remember a story like this from my granddad from his younger days...It had all the same hallmarks as the controversy of UAV’s carrying passengers and cargo, "that will never happen!” "No one will ever trust it!" "There's no way it can work without someone at the controls." "We’ll be long retired or dead before that technology happens!"

…….He was talking about elevators…..

Never say never….

FedExBusBoy

If you're still around in 50 years my assumption of you was right on.........Young, dumb and............

FDXLAG

Proof of what they say about assumptions.

cma2407

I think you ment to say the same people who won't travel in drones, won't want to be overflown by a 6000,000 drone.

CMA: I definetly dig your avatar......................[/QUOTE]


Sorry boys, she has been put out to pasture. Evidently this is the kind of humor that does not meet the PG-13 criteria, and is thus inappropriate for this forum. Or so I am told.

Looks like it's back to talking gunpowder and ***** without the visuals.

cma2407

Gee...an auto-censor. I've gotta admit, that's a first being censored twice in 1 email.

Maybe I need to go to rehab now.

NE_Pilot

I think the costs of making and running an unmanned aircraft for cargo or passenger carrying exceeds the costs of having a pilot. There was a recent study showing that it cost less to patrol the border with a pilot and single engine airplane per hour, than it did to have a UAV do the same work.

These unmanned aircraft require much larger ground crews (means employing more people, means paying more people, costing more money overall), than would be required if you had a pilot. Further the risks involved are much greater when you talk about hacking and jamming.

As people have mentioned earlier, autopilots act weird, they shut off at random times, etc. That's unacceptable if it is the only thing flying the aircraft. Rick mentioned it happened about twice a month, no big deal, doesn't really need much work done to it since you have two pilots there who are more than capable of flying it by hand. The fact is it would be costly and difficult to fix that problem, something that would be required to be fixed if unmanned, possibly grounding whole airworthy fleets for undetermined amounts of time.

Also computers crash, they crash all the time, sometimes for no apparent reason at all, its no big deal, but when its the only thing flying the aircraft it becomes a big deal.

Further let's look at some other modes of transportation, you got automatic elevators, trains still have Engineers, boats still have Captains, and cars still have Drivers. Those would be automated first, prior to aircraft, due to the simplicity of it, dealing with less dimensions.

The Pilot isn't there for when things go right, the pilot is there for when the **** hits the fan, when judgement and experience count, something a computer lacks.

FDXLAG

So they will teach the cranium FA to hit Ctrl-Alt-Del. For the cargo jets you keep some over 60 engineers around.

jetmech1

Does this mean I can retire?

UFO Driver

Seems that eveyone has overlooked that fact that currently UAVs still have pilots, they are just in a control room far far away with a joystick and throttle, watching their performance through cameras.