Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   It's a small, small world (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/10734-its-small-small-world.html)

aero550 03-19-2007 04:37 AM


Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot (Post 135466)
Don't forget though, that since we are not face to face, some things may be taken the wrong way. just my .02 cents:o

True, but since you have chosen to write on an open forum, the onus is really on you to do everything in your power to insure that something doesn't get taken the wrong way due to the method of communication. This is where quite a few people seem to get confused.

I've reworded posts before, and completely deleted whole or partial posts prior to submitting, because after I read it over, it appeared more offensive than I intended. Sometimes what you think you are typing and what actually got typed are two separate things.

CE750 03-19-2007 04:57 AM

I can say with certainty that I've never posted an opinion on one of these boards that I've not stated, almost word for word, either in a conversation in the crew room, the cockpit, or to my various past Chief Pilots.. I've always been of the opinion that if your not man enough to state your view, you're like then not man enough to command a Beach 1900, much less anything bigger..

It's called character, and if you don't say things just to avoid any fray, in my view you effectively lie.

That said, being civil goes without saying.. that is also what gentleman do.

BigWatchPilot 03-19-2007 05:19 AM


Originally Posted by CE750 (Post 135474)
I can say with certainty that I've never posted an opinion on one of these boards that I've not stated, almost word for word, either in a conversation in the crew room, the cockpit, or to my various past Chief Pilots.. I've always been of the opinion that if your not man enough to state your view, you're like then not man enough to command a Beach 1900, much less anything bigger..

It's called character, and if you don't say things just to avoid any fray, in my view you effectively lie.

That said, being civil goes without saying.. that is also what gentleman do.

Good point from most people so far...but why don't we all just use our real names rather than screen names??? (other than tony...if that is your REAL name:D )

HotMamaPilot 03-19-2007 06:39 AM


Originally Posted by BigWatchPilot (Post 135481)
Good point from most people so far...but why don't we all just use our real names rather than screen names??? (other than tony...if that is your REAL name:D )

GOOD point

MD11Fr8Dog 03-19-2007 07:03 AM


Originally Posted by BigWatchPilot (Post 135481)
Good point from most people so far...but why don't we all just use our real names rather than screen names??? (other than tony...if that is your REAL name:D )

Okay, you go first! ;)

TonyC 03-19-2007 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot (Post 135387)

Don't you think that people benefit from various view points and not just the one that will kiss the bosses a$$?

. . .

Are you saying that only one opinion matters? (nazis)?. Are you saying that someones career could be ruined because of an opinion?

. . .

Why did you post that? Your post was as useless as a tit on a bull. Yes, that's my opinion.


Well, your opinion is stupid.

I kid, I kid. I was just teasin'! Relax! :)


It's interesting to see the directions that the conversation has taken, given the lack of specifics in my post. I think they're all good things to think about as we attempt to communicate in this tricky internet medium. However, I did not intend to imply that only one opinion is acceptable. Certainly, there will always be many opinions on a subject. I think it's not unreasonable, though, to expect that we express our differing opinions in a civil, respectful manner. The veil of anonymity we think we may enjoy here (see below) does not relieve us of the responsibility to conduct ourselves any differently than if we were talking to each other face to face. So, one point I was trying to make is that we should express our opinions, however different they may be, in a manner that reflects well upon ourselves. I can completely disagree with Tom, Dick, or Harry on a particular subject, and at the same time have a respect for them based on the way they conduct themselves in the debate. Conversely, I can completely agree with John on a particular subject, and be embarrassed to know him because of the fool he makes of himself in expressing his opinion.




Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog (Post 135408)

I think you miss the real context of Tony's post. We had idiot on here the other day that should have heeded Tony's advice! Unfortunately, that thread mysteriously disappeared!


While I wish the thread was around to serve as a testament to the concept I tried to describe, it contained far too much detailed information about a person who did not consent to having that personal information distributed throughout the world on the internet. The need to protect that person, I believe, outweighed any other benefit we might have gained by reading the thread now. Lucky fox. (See below.)





Originally Posted by Purple F/O (Post 135449)

Care to elaborate specifically/generally for those of us who missed it?


I thought I'd let Aesop do the talking for me, so I looked around the internet for a particular fable. I'm not a huge fan of Wikipedia, but I think in this case it does a good job of describing the context.


The Fox and the Grapes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Fox and the Grapes is a fable attributed to Aesop. The protagonist, a fox, upon failing to find a way to reach grapes hanging high up on a vine, retreated and said: "The grapes are sour anyway!". The moral is stated at the end of the fable as:
It is easy to despise what you cannot get.
The English idiom "sour grapes" - derived from this fable - refers to the denial of one's desire for something that one fails to acquire or to the person who holds such denial. Similar expressions exist in other languages. In psychology, this behavior is known as rationalization. It may also be called reduction of cognitive dissonance.

In colloquial speech the idiom is often applied to someone who loses and fails to do so gracefully. Strictly speaking, it should be applied to someone who, after losing, denies the intention to win altogether. The phrase is misused in all sorts of ways by people who do not know the original story and imagine it means something more general like "bitterness" or "resentment".

The "Fox" in our story had an aquaintance (I can't say friend, because friends don't treat each other the way he did) who could help him reach the grapes in due time. When he began to insult the grapes, he also insulted all those who eat grapes, and the one person who could help him achieve the status of grape-eater.

Wikipedia goes on to mention how we might have gotten a different message than what Aesop intended in the first place, and the alternate meaning might be particularly applicable in this case.

Unripe versus sour

The moral of the fable centers on the qualification by the fox, when he finds his desire unattainable. The word "sour" was probably chosen by the translators in Western Europe, writing during the Victorian era. Study of older versions of the fable suggest that "unripe" might be a more literal translation, the idea being that the fox would come back later to try in earnest. The word "unripe" may have been replaced with "sour" by the fable's Victorian translators since the word "unripe", in Victorian society, might have been interpreted as an innuendo suggesting an as-yet unripe woman.
In alienating the only person that could help him taste the grapes, he ensured that he will never enjoy the grapes, no matter how many times he may come back again and try.

As for this being a small world (and the presumed veil of anonymity), our "Fox" thought he was anonymous to the people he was bad-mouthing. However, the person whom he offended most was reading along, dumbfounded at his behavior. And in another twist of fate, I've known the person whom he berated for many years, and can confirm just how wrong he was.




Originally Posted by BigWatchPilot (Post 135481)

Good point from most people so far...but why don't we all just use our real names rather than screen names??? (other than tony...if that is your REAL name:D )


We'll start by my revealing your name, your hire date, the equipment and seat that you fly, and, for good measure, I'll explain that you weren't really that qualified to get your job in the first place -- you got special treatment based on your hair color. No, wait, that's the thread that got deleted. Never mind. ;)






.

Purple F/O 03-19-2007 11:57 AM

Are you talking about FedUp and a fedex pilot?

TonyC 03-19-2007 12:04 PM


Originally Posted by Purple F/O (Post 135651)

Are you talking about FedUp ?


His name is MuD.





.

fedupbusdriver 03-19-2007 12:09 PM


Originally Posted by Purple F/O (Post 135651)
Are you talking about FedUp and CC or KC?

Hey.....

How did I get mixed up into this post?:eek:

TonyC 03-19-2007 12:23 PM


Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver (Post 135661)

Hey.....

How did I get mixed up into this post?:eek:


I don't think he was talking about you -- he was talking about someone who claimed to be fed up with FedEx.



.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:18 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands