Apr disputed pairings
03-29-2007, 05:34 AM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 211
Apr disputed pairings
Just looked at april's open time and noticed that all the VCP-SJU disputed trips were open in both seats. That's progress. Will be interesting to see how long that lasts tonight and if the same people pick them up as last month.
03-29-2007, 05:54 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 349
Originally Posted by boxhauler
Just looked at april's open time and noticed that all the VCP-SJU disputed trips were open in both seats. That's progress. Will be interesting to see how long that lasts tonight and if the same people pick them up as last month.
Past...
03-29-2007, 03:55 PM
#5
Living the dream!
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 915
Originally Posted by boxhauler
Just looked at april's open time and noticed that all the VCP-SJU disputed trips were open in both seats. That's progress. Will be interesting to see how long that lasts tonight and if the same people pick them up as last month.
My guess is seconds. I hope I'm wrong. Or the ALA trips. Actually some of those have already gone to VTOs.
03-29-2007, 05:16 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 398
They won't last... it isn't a coincidence that the pairing has SFS and ALA in it. If it was Shemya and Mumbai, then MAYBE it would go untouched. But I think it might be a little too tempting for some..... you guys get what I mean.
Had a jumpseater the other day.... told me he was flying in to do the Campinas trip. And then said it did have the SJU-MEM on the end of it. I mentioned it was a disputed pairing. He bragged it "fit so well in my schedule, what a great deal I got." While he screwed the rest of us...
Had a jumpseater the other day.... told me he was flying in to do the Campinas trip. And then said it did have the SJU-MEM on the end of it. I mentioned it was a disputed pairing. He bragged it "fit so well in my schedule, what a great deal I got." While he screwed the rest of us...
03-29-2007, 06:25 PM
#8
Slainge Var'
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
I noticed a MD-11 Capt disputed pairing that had an F/O, Mark Provo, already assigned. Does this mean that Mark Provo asked for this disputed pairing on his VTO request or did Mark Provo not? And if Mark Provo did, does this mean that Mark Provo was uninformed or that maybe Mark Provo was informed but Mark Provo forgot or could it be that Mark Provo doesn't care or maybe Mark Provo does care but not much. I don't think Mark Provo is actively working against us but maybe Mark Provo is. If I ever meet Mark Provo, I'll ask Mark Provo just what Mark Provo was thinking.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
272
03-06-2007 12:51 PM
