![]() |
What is the current status of the ABX contract? How long is it over due for new one? How are the negations going or is it in mediation?
|
Originally Posted by Wayst
(Post 2698429)
What is the current status of the ABX contract? How long is it over due for new one? How are the negations going or is it in mediation?
|
How long can mediation go on for before the mediator has to make a decision under the Railroad Labor Act? Does this mean the mediator will approve a strike if there is no agreement?
|
The Railroad Labor Act is a farce and should be replaced yesterday. Pilots should contact their congress member and demand action. It's almost 2019 and for pilot labor / employment mediation and collective bargaining to be held hostage by rules that are out of date and irrelevant by way of the RLA is beyond a joke.
|
Originally Posted by Wayst
(Post 2698493)
How long can mediation go on for before the mediator has to make a decision under the Railroad Labor Act?
|
Originally Posted by Wayst
(Post 2698429)
What is the current status of the ABX contract? How long is it over due for new one? How are the negations going or is it in mediation?
|
Originally Posted by ROBsINtheHOOD
(Post 2698517)
The Railroad Labor Act is a farce and should be replaced yesterday. Pilots should contact their congress member and demand action. It's almost 2019 and for pilot labor / employment mediation and collective bargaining to be held hostage by rules that are out of date and irrelevant by way of the RLA is beyond a joke.
1926?? Out of date? Yes. It would be very difficult to get Congress to do any action. Favors business(transportation) too much. I do agree though, the rules need to be amended. 1926?? |
Originally Posted by nitefr8dog
(Post 2698554)
The RLA is a toothless dog.
The purpose of the RLA is to prevent disruptions in the nation's transportation systems. At that purpose, it is far from toothless. The RLA is quite effective at preventing strikes and lockouts. The protracted negotiation process is exactly what the RLA was intended to produce. |
Originally Posted by Larry in TN
(Post 2699056)
While I understand what you're saying, I think you've misidentified the purpose of the RLA. The RLA isn't in place to ensure that transportation workers get a fair contract in a reasonable amount of time.
The purpose of the RLA is to prevent disruptions in the nation's transportation systems. At that purpose, it is far from toothless. The RLA is quite effective at preventing strikes and lockouts. The protracted negotiation process is exactly what the RLA was intended to produce. Airlines are totally different. They don't own the sky. If Delta goes on strike tomorrow Atlanta doesn't lose all air service. Will Atlanta or the nations commerce be negatively impacted? Certainly. But if the strike goes on long enough other airlines will add service and in the long term there will be no change in the economy. Why should airline employees be treated any differently than say truckers. I would submit that a nationwide trucker strike would be more damaging to the national economy than an airline strike. How about health care. Many local hospitals are now owned by Nationwide companies like Humana or Adventist. Why don't they have a similar act? The RLA is essentially indentured servitude for airline employees. (especially pilots, mechanics and flight attendants) Because of our seniority system it is virtually impossible for senior employees to consider changing employers. We are approaching the 100th anniversary of this law. It's time for it to go. |
Originally Posted by sky jet
(Post 2699061)
The RLA is essentially indentured servitude for airline employees.
Because of our seniority system it is virtually impossible for senior employees to consider changing employers. It's time for it to go. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:45 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands