Amazon is getting 15 more 737s
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amazon-to-lease-15-more-boeing-737-800s-through-gecas-to-support-one-day-shipping-2019-06-18?mod=mw_quote_news
Where oh where will they go...... And hey anyone know the deal with those DHL tripples? Heard Southern was getting a few but with all the Atlas/Southern family drama I’d think Amazon and DHL would want to diversify more. |
Originally Posted by gearslinger6
(Post 2838701)
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amazon-to-lease-15-more-boeing-737-800s-through-gecas-to-support-one-day-shipping-2019-06-18?mod=mw_quote_news
Where oh where will they go...... And hey anyone know the deal with those DHL tripples? Heard Southern was getting a few but with all the Atlas/Southern family drama I’d think Amazon and DHL would want to diversify more. |
The two tripples are DHL, not Amazon. The article was about 73's not triples...
|
Tracking...DHL had ordered 14 (I think) awhile back, just wondering the latest rumors where they are going.
|
Triples.
Juan Trippels? Plane Coffee |
Originally Posted by robi523
(Post 2838762)
The two tripples are DHL, not Amazon. The article was about 73's not triples...
|
Originally Posted by galleycafe
(Post 2838801)
Triples.
Juan Trippels? Plane Coffee |
I'm guessing that three are going to Mesa... JO is coming to whipsaw the ACMI world!
|
I would look for Swift to make an appearance in this rancid gene puddle soon.
|
Amazon unfortunately is operating like DHL. A hodgepodge of ACMI carriers who low bid each other for the business and a race to the bottom. The only way for the pilots to come out on top in this scumbag environment , is a radical new approach and tactic to unify the acmi labor groups and demand across the board competitive wages. It would be a monumental undertaking but one worth the effort imo. The collective union groups would have to bury the past and focus on the future.
Am I dreaming or can a concept like this work? otherwise its a lost battle and each pilot group is ticked at the other. With FedEx dropping Amazon, the lift is going to the other acmi carriers, but the wages are not. Its a win for Amazon. (Cheaper lift than FedEx) Please chime in with your thoughts. Thanks |
Originally Posted by MentalMidget
(Post 2839184)
Amazon unfortunately is operating like DHL. A hodgepodge of ACMI carriers who low bid each other for the business and a race to the bottom. The only way for the pilots to come out on top in this scumbag environment , is a radical new approach and tactic to unify the acmi labor groups and demand across the board competitive wages. It would be a monumental undertaking but one worth the effort imo. The collective union groups would have to bury the past and focus on the future.
Am I dreaming or can a concept like this work? otherwise its a lost battle and each pilot group is ticked at the other. With FedEx dropping Amazon, the lift is going to the other acmi carriers, but the wages are not. Its a win for Amazon. (Cheaper lift than FedEx) Please chime in with your thoughts. Thanks |
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2839208)
1224 tried that, and they ruined it when they tried to hold K4 pilot group back.
Look... There's no magic wand. If management wants to treat you the way Atlas/Southern is treated then it's up to the pilot group. Since Atlas can't vote 100% of their pilots younger than about 58 should have apps out. Leave. |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839216)
The K4 pilot group voted for the worst retirement that I know of in aviation. They VOTED for it. It wasn't rammed down their throats by an Arbitrator like Atlas/Southern is about to go through. I listened to them threaten 1224 leadership on crew call ins because leadership wouldn't allow them to overwhelmingly vote FOR THE worst retirement in aviation. How in the world was 1224 holding K4 back? If Connie had offered a $40 an hour raise with a 2.5% match he'd have probably gotten over 50%.
Look... There's no magic wand. If management wants to treat you the way Atlas/Southern is treated then it's up to the pilot group. Since Atlas can't vote 100% of their pilots younger than about 58 should have apps out. Leave. |
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2839227)
We have a pretty unified pilot group, fixing retirement is high up on the list.
|
Originally Posted by MentalMidget
(Post 2839184)
Amazon unfortunately is operating like DHL. A hodgepodge of ACMI carriers who low bid each other for the business and a race to the bottom. The only way for the pilots to come out on top in this scumbag environment , is a radical new approach and tactic to unify the acmi labor groups and demand across the board competitive wages. It would be a monumental undertaking but one worth the effort imo. The collective union groups would have to bury the past and focus on the future.
Am I dreaming or can a concept like this work? otherwise its a lost battle and each pilot group is ticked at the other. With FedEx dropping Amazon, the lift is going to the other acmi carriers, but the wages are not. Its a win for Amazon. (Cheaper lift than FedEx) Please chime in with your thoughts. Thanks I would give something like this my tentative support. My full support would depend on exactly which personalities begin to emerge as "leaders". Character is critical, as I don't need to explain. Problem is, there are so many "characters" in this industry. Someone should try to organize it. Someone with some vision. |
Originally Posted by MentalMidget
(Post 2839184)
Amazon unfortunately is operating like DHL. A hodgepodge of ACMI carriers who low bid each other for the business and a race to the bottom. The only way for the pilots to come out on top in this scumbag environment , is a radical new approach and tactic to unify the acmi labor groups and demand across the board competitive wages. It would be a monumental undertaking but one worth the effort imo. The collective union groups would have to bury the past and focus on the future.
Am I dreaming or can a concept like this work? otherwise its a lost battle and each pilot group is ticked at the other. With FedEx dropping Amazon, the lift is going to the other acmi carriers, but the wages are not. Its a win for Amazon. (Cheaper lift than FedEx) Please chime in with your thoughts. Thanks |
Originally Posted by woog315
(Post 2839381)
It has already failed. Kalitta left 1224, and with that the dream of a unified ramp died. Kalitta had decent reasons, although maybe a bit short sighted, for leaving the Teamsters. The blame doesnt just lie with Kalitta, DW ****ed off both Omni and kalitta by stalling their contracts *way* longer than necessary. Guys will always push for their own short to medium term best interest and that's going to make it impossible to do what you suggest. It would require sacrifice, and pilots as a whole aren't going to sacrifice anything when a shiny jet gets dangled in front of them- particularly not for their competitor!
What we need is a single seniority list that is based upon your total years flying union 121, not years at company ABC. Your seniority and pay are totally portable. If company A is treating their pilots poorly, you go to Company B with your seniority and standard union benefits intact. The companies can go bid for contracts to their hearts content, but like the steel industry, they pay union wages. There is no whipsaw since it’s one big pilot group. The only way to implement it, since nobody currently working is going to let an Atlas guy come into K4 or OMNI and bid ahead of them is to build it with a fence. Anybody hired after a certain date goes onto the single list. Once the percentage is high enough of one listers working, the union gives every company the new base contract, benefits package and retirement package. With the rapid turnover and hiring, this is actually a good time to work on this. 1224 should pick a date, about 4-5 years from now, and ensure no new CBA’s are signed with a duration beyond that date. It will put every 1224 into section six simultaneously. Quietly be building the single list starting today for all new hires. Draft the 1224 CBA and just wait. NFL and other sporting teams are unionized with an industry wide common CBA for everything except pay which fir them is performance related above a basic pay. This takes the whipsaw off the table. Just a random thought.... |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 2839461)
What it requires is a change to how airline unions operate. A page could be taken from the steel workers union. It doesn’t matter which construction company gets the bid award to build a new bridge or building. They must hire union steel workers. The companies don’t dictate wages, the union does.
What we need is a single seniority list that is based upon your total years flying union 121, not years at company ABC. Your seniority and pay are totally portable. If company A is treating their pilots poorly, you go to Company B with your seniority and standard union benefits intact. The companies can go bid for contracts to their hearts content, but like the steel industry, they pay union wages. There is no whipsaw since it’s one big pilot group. The only way to implement it, since nobody currently working is going to let an Atlas guy come into K4 or OMNI and bid ahead of them is to build it with a fence. Anybody hired after a certain date goes onto the single list. Once the percentage is high enough of one listers working, the union gives every company the new base contract, benefits package and retirement package. With the rapid turnover and hiring, this is actually a good time to work on this. 1224 should pick a date, about 4-5 years from now, and ensure no new CBA’s are signed with a duration beyond that date. It will put every 1224 into section six simultaneously. Quietly be building the single list starting today for all new hires. Draft the 1224 CBA and just wait. NFL and other sporting teams are unionized with an industry wide common CBA for everything except pay which fir them is performance related above a basic pay. This takes the whipsaw off the table. Just a random thought.... |
I don't think the RLA will allow that. Steelworkers unions fall under the NLRB which is a bit different, and it's more than coincidence it's that way.
|
Originally Posted by woog315
(Post 2839381)
It has already failed. Kalitta left 1224, and with that the dream of a unified ramp died. Kalitta had decent reasons, although maybe a bit short sighted, for leaving the Teamsters. The blame doesnt just lie with Kalitta, DW ****ed off both Omni and kalitta by stalling their contracts *way* longer than necessary. Guys will always push for their own short to medium term best interest and that's going to make it impossible to do what you suggest. It would require sacrifice, and pilots as a whole aren't going to sacrifice anything when a shiny jet gets dangled in front of them- particularly not for their competitor!
The system was supposed to be that there'd be agreements that there was a floor that nobody would accept less than. You can do that without all being in the same Union if Pilot Groups would hold out for Industry Standard Contracts and Atlas/Southern wasn't getting Amalgamated. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 2839461)
What it requires is a change to how airline unions operate. A page could be taken from the steel workers union. It doesn’t matter which construction company gets the bid award to build a new bridge or building. They must hire union steel workers. The companies don’t dictate wages, the union does.
What we need is a single seniority list that is based upon your total years flying union 121, not years at company ABC. Your seniority and pay are totally portable. If company A is treating their pilots poorly, you go to Company B with your seniority and standard union benefits intact. The companies can go bid for contracts to their hearts content, but like the steel industry, they pay union wages. There is no whipsaw since it’s one big pilot group. The only way to implement it, since nobody currently working is going to let an Atlas guy come into K4 or OMNI and bid ahead of them is to build it with a fence. Anybody hired after a certain date goes onto the single list. Once the percentage is high enough of one listers working, the union gives every company the new base contract, benefits package and retirement package. With the rapid turnover and hiring, this is actually a good time to work on this. 1224 should pick a date, about 4-5 years from now, and ensure no new CBA’s are signed with a duration beyond that date. It will put every 1224 into section six simultaneously. Quietly be building the single list starting today for all new hires. Draft the 1224 CBA and just wait. NFL and other sporting teams are unionized with an industry wide common CBA for everything except pay which fir them is performance related above a basic pay. This takes the whipsaw off the table. Just a random thought.... |
Originally Posted by Asiabound
(Post 2839492)
I don't think the RLA will allow that. Steelworkers unions fall under the NLRB which is a bit different, and it's more than coincidence it's that way.
In fact, one is very similar to the 1224 and ATI, ABX, Omni case all owned by ATSG. AMR (prior to AAG) owned; American, American Eagle & Executive Airlines. American Eagle and Executive shared a single pilot list and single CBA but where in fact two separate companies.... just like ATSG owns three subsidiaries. Principle is sound. |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839493)
Blame DW all you want but if Pilot Groups are threatening Union Leadership with violence to vote for the Retirement that they voted for then you can't blame 1224 Leadership. If the Pilot Groups that work for these ACMI Carriers all want to vote for a 5% 401k match on a 10% Personal contribution that's limited to $10,000, no daily trip rig, less than industry standard pay rates, 64 hour guarantees, and 26 hour work days then it sets the bar low for all the other carriers. If Atlas/Southern end up in front of an Arbitrator in the next 12 months there's nothing leadership can do.
The system was supposed to be that there'd be agreements that there was a floor that nobody would accept less than. You can do that without all being in the same Union if Pilot Groups would hold out for Industry Standard Contracts and Atlas/Southern wasn't getting Amalgamated. 1224 screwed the pooch, they cost many pilots over 100,000k delaying that contract, they ****ed off management that wanted to grow the airline and knew they couldn't without large pay raises. From some one standing over at K4 looking outward at 1224, it seemed very much so like our competitor was trying to hold us back with their pull in 1224 for their own gains. It's no wonder we went to ALPA as quickly and effectively as we did. |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839493)
Blame DW all you want but if Pilot Groups are threatening Union Leadership with violence to vote for the Retirement that they voted for then you can't blame 1224 Leadership. If the Pilot Groups that work for these ACMI Carriers all want to vote for a 5% 401k match on a 10% Personal contribution that's limited to $10,000, no daily trip rig, less than industry standard pay rates, 64 hour guarantees, and 26 hour work days then it sets the bar low for all the other carriers. If Atlas/Southern end up in front of an Arbitrator in the next 12 months there's nothing leadership can do.
The system was supposed to be that there'd be agreements that there was a floor that nobody would accept less than. You can do that without all being in the same Union if Pilot Groups would hold out for Industry Standard Contracts and Atlas/Southern wasn't getting Amalgamated. Maybe you should review some old posts where it was explained to you Especially about 1224 delaying our contract and the e board nearly voting it down Like nl3 said dw's bs cost me 100k How's that for retirement |
Originally Posted by Lockheed
(Post 2839649)
As usual you have no f'ing clue what you are talking about
Maybe you should review some old posts where it was explained to you Especially about 1224 delaying our contract and the e board nearly voting it down Like nl3 said dw's bs cost me 100k How's that for retirement |
Originally Posted by dwight3
(Post 2839653)
Yeah, he probably cost you 100k in the short term but could've made you 100's of thousands more in the long term but some people are just too short sighted.
We got 100% pay raise, Bis class travel, way better hours of service amongst other big things Our retirement was increased by 2x do you think a neg committee can get every single item they want in 1 contract cycle? btw - our horrible retirement was the idea of our great 1224 legal team - you know the ones |
Originally Posted by dwight3
(Post 2839653)
Yeah, he probably cost you 100k in the short term but could've made you 100's of thousands more in the long term but some people are just too short sighted.
|
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2839683)
|
Originally Posted by Lockheed
(Post 2839649)
As usual you have no f'ing clue what you are talking about
Maybe you should review some old posts where it was explained to you Especially about 1224 delaying our contract and the e board nearly voting it down Like nl3 said dw's bs cost me 100k How's that for retirement |
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2839683)
|
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839712)
From the bottom of my heart I hope that's true. I don't think Connie is any better of a guy than JD or BF at Atlas. They don't care about who stays to work there in any way. I think you're going to be in for a big fight too.
|
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839216)
The K4 pilot group voted for the worst retirement that I know of in aviation. They VOTED for it. It wasn't rammed down their throats by an Arbitrator like Atlas/Southern is about to go through. I listened to them threaten 1224 leadership on crew call ins because leadership wouldn't allow them to overwhelmingly vote FOR THE worst retirement in aviation. How in the world was 1224 holding K4 back? If Connie had offered a $40 an hour raise with a 2.5% match he'd have probably gotten over 50%.
Look... There's no magic wand. If management wants to treat you the way Atlas/Southern is treated then it's up to the pilot group. Since Atlas can't vote 100% of their pilots younger than about 58 should have apps out. Leave. |
Originally Posted by maxjet
(Post 2839763)
You are either trying to start an argument or you have no idea of why K4 left 1224. Retirement was never even on the table for K4. Wasn’t even mentioned. Way higher priority items for our pilot group. Great results by our negotiation committee that 1224 tried to take away from us, good riddance
FACT - You wanted to vote yes on your contract that has the worst retirement that I know of. While we're at it we can talk about monthly guarantee, duty day, Trip Rig, days of service and unpaid 24-7s. I'm fully aware retirement wasn't a priority of K4 pilots, but there were a slew of things DW took issue with that your group had zero problem with. Retirement was used by me as the glaring example. My understanding is that you wanted a Rate that was branded as "FedEx's Old Contract". That's all you really cared about at that time. FACT - DW held back that contract in an attempt to get you more with regard to work rules... Meaning shorter duty days... etc... Since DW wanted more for your contract than your pilot group did how did he hold you back? If memory serves correct about 90% of yall were yes votes. Connie could've had you for far less if it weren't for DW. Yall wanted the Rate and you wanted it then after a long hard fight. Best of luck in the next negotiation. ACMI is far behind the rest of the Industry and I sincerely hope yall are ready to push to fix these problems. Atlas may be counting on you to get gains because I agree with yall that there is a statistical chance you get a contract first. I tell people to go to K4... It's a better deal. |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839822)
You're coming into this argument late... The quote that started all of this was something like "DW held us back..."
FACT - You wanted to vote yes on your contract that has the worst retirement that I know of. While we're at it we can talk about monthly guarantee, duty day, Trip Rig, days of service and unpaid 24-7s. I'm fully aware retirement wasn't a priority of K4 pilots, but there were a slew of things DW took issue with that your group had zero problem with. Retirement was used by me as the glaring example. My understanding is that you wanted a Rate that was branded as "FedEx's Old Contract". That's all you really cared about at that time. FACT - DW held back that contract in an attempt to get you more with regard to work rules... Meaning shorter duty days... etc... Since DW wanted more for your contract than your pilot group did how did he hold you back? If memory serves correct about 90% of yall were yes votes. Connie could've had you for far less if it weren't for DW. Yall wanted the Rate and you wanted it then after a long hard fight. Best of luck in the next negotiation. ACMI is far behind the rest of the Industry and I sincerely hope yall are ready to push to fix these problems. Atlas may be counting on you to get gains because I agree with yall that there is a statistical chance you get a contract first. I tell people to go to K4... It's a better deal. |
Originally Posted by WmuGrad07
(Post 2839897)
Worst retirement that you know of? You're not looking at the regionals then! Charter? Corporate? Your own? So we cap out at 10k a year on 5%. You can't hit that until you're over 200k. How many captains do you have over 200k? I'd say most, if not every single one of ours are there; if not they're close.
The point was that DW wasn't holding you back from better contract language. Actually... You're proving my point. You're thrilled with your contract. I'm pretty sure DW thinks it's not a great contract. You'd have gladly accepted less because your retirement is better than Air Wisconsin's... You're thrilled with the work rules too despite most of them being behind Atlas's antiquated contract... Your pilot group voted yes overwhelmingly to something DW would've voted no on. I left Atlas. I don't see them getting a Retirement that makes it worth working there because none of the other ACMI carriers have anything that make it worth sticking around. If everyone voted with their feet then it'd change... But yall are happy and that's is a beautiful thing. |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839922)
The point was that DW wasn't holding you back from better contract language. Actually... You're proving my point. Nothing emotionally attached with this statement. It is just the reality of the situation. But as Globemaster pointed out, if you all are good with that, we are all happy for you. |
Originally Posted by JonnyKnoxville
(Post 2839947)
To expand on this, DW wasn't technically holding you all back, you all were holding DW back.
Nothing emotionally attached with this statement. It is just the reality of the situation. But as Globemaster pointed out, if you all are good with that, we are all happy for you. Here is the thing on the work rules. We had 30 hrs. We negotiated to 24, which was what we wanted, so we didn’t get stuck in hostile zones because of duty day AND the company would be able to bid the military trips and make a profit. SO, we were forced to work under the 30 hour and other old work rules for a year. Guess what happened when we went to what was an expensive arbitration, paid for by our pilot group, not 1224 BTW? We were awarded the originally agreed upon work rules. Why was this done to us? To advance the cause of Atlas negotiations. I took a 30,000.00+ pay loss because of this bull crap. Interesting thing here. I read AAWW pilots on here rightfully complaining that they did not get to vote on their last contract and that they may not get to vote on this one. I agree this is bad. Wonder why it was OK for Atlas thru DW to do that to us? One of the advantages of ALPA is that a local is not forced to borrow money from the Teamsters and then pay it back for negotiations. Is ALPA perfect? Not at all, but way better that the financially and morally corrupt 747 and now the morally corrupt 1224*. *my opinion only |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839822)
You're coming into this argument late... The quote that started all of this was something like "DW held us back..."
FACT - You wanted to vote yes on your contract that has the worst retirement that I know of. While we're at it we can talk about monthly guarantee, duty day, Trip Rig, days of service and unpaid 24-7s. I'm fully aware retirement wasn't a priority of K4 pilots, but there were a slew of things DW took issue with that your group had zero problem with. Retirement was used by me as the glaring example. My understanding is that you wanted a Rate that was branded as "FedEx's Old Contract". That's all you really cared about at that time. FACT - DW held back that contract in an attempt to get you more with regard to work rules... Meaning shorter duty days... etc... Since DW wanted more for your contract than your pilot group did how did he hold you back? If memory serves correct about 90% of yall were yes votes. Connie could've had you for far less if it weren't for DW. Yall wanted the Rate and you wanted it then after a long hard fight. Best of luck in the next negotiation. ACMI is far behind the rest of the Industry and I sincerely hope yall are ready to push to fix these problems. Atlas may be counting on you to get gains because I agree with yall that there is a statistical chance you get a contract first. I tell people to go to K4... It's a better deal. |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 2839710)
11-12% of what you make... Every year... For the rest of your career... Compounded with interest (How's the market performed since that was signed again?). It was probably a bigger deal than what you thought it was... I think everyone leaving for greener pastures was a better strategy but I'm glad yall are happy.
So they didn’t get 10-12% for those four years. They did get $80-$150k more than they had before each of those four years. They were smart to lock in the large great gains.... |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 2840291)
It’s a 4 year contract. You don’t think they’d get the direct contribution at the next amendment round? In the meantime they’ve doubled their pay those four years and improved their working conditions.
So they didn’t get 10-12% for those four years. They did get $80-$150k more than they had before each of those four years. They were smart to lock in the large great gains.... With no ax to grind Thanks |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:08 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands