Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

“Prime Air”

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2019, 04:26 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: ERJ
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by Csy Mon View Post
Almost wish I had that kind of insurance policy, but being a white male, you were toast if not good:

no money for extra sim time or more instruction at Evergreen, swim or sink kiddo.
You're contradicting yourself. Why did you bring up race, then say there was actually no money for retraining? Sounds like you have some sort of hangup.. I would say that everyone, white male or otherwise, was toast if they needed retraining back when the pilot market was saturated. Nowadays pilots are coming to the majors with more relevant (jet) experience thanks to the regional airlines who must do everything they can to retain pilots, including those who you think aren't as cool or qualified as you because they needed an extra sim.
Originally Posted by Csy Mon View Post
No minorities in class, hiring was strictly based on minimum 4000 hours and at least one Type Rating...
Again, I'm not sure why you felt the need to include race. You understand minorities that get hired meet the same hiring qualifications as everyone else, correct? To think it was only 55 years ago that qualified minority pilots had to go through the Supreme Court in order to be treated fairly. And now you think airline hiring/training departments discriminated against a demographic that makes up over 90% of the airline pilot work force?
poopplop is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 04:28 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Default

Originally Posted by 45guy View Post
Do some people really tell others when asked what they do...that they fly for "Prime Air"?
Yes I’ve had a few FAs tell me their BF for Amazon
NovemberBravo is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 05:20 AM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Default

Originally Posted by NovemberBravo View Post
Yes I’ve had a few FAs tell me their BF for Amazon
Hmmmm 2 thoughts:

First, if it’s coming from an FA then any info is automatically suspect.

Second, assuming this FA is correct then we can only assume the BF had been trying to get a landing clearance in the laid county airport. Can anyone really blame him? Hell I’ve seen guys make up far worse to score!
NeverHome is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 05:58 AM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Retired
Posts: 651
Default

Originally Posted by Csy Mon View Post
Almost wish I had that kind of insurance policy, but being a white male, you were toast if not good:...
The worst pilot I have flown with on the line was a white male. Ex-military, protected by his buddies in the training center. (He is long gone, but failed out of training at the legacy that he went to.)

IMO if you are going to be a marginal pilot it is best to be white, male and well liked socially. But you need all three.
742Dash is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 07:30 AM
  #155  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by 742Dash View Post
The worst pilot I have flown with on the line was a white male. Ex-military, protected by his buddies in the training center. (He is long gone, but failed out of training at the legacy that he went to.)

IMO if you are going to be a marginal pilot it is best to be white, male and well liked socially. But you need all three.

Couldn’t agree more. I’m not disagreeing that maybe HR is more lenient on other types, but when it comes to the actual training department and line itself- white men and their buddies have the most protection. Which keeps it from ever even getting far enough to become an HR issue.
TripleIsolation is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 07:43 AM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Position: ATL FO
Posts: 189
Default

After absorbing the transcripts, it’s clear this was a (preventable)tragedy every way you slice it. Three people dead who should be with their families this holiday season. It’s unspeakable. It’s easy to pile onto the dead guy, and make no mistake about it, he killed himself and two other people, but moving forward there are some points that can be drawn.

1. If this guy had slipped through the cracks at any pax carrying outfit and tanked one into the swamp, this would’ve been another Colgan. Which among other factors back then, sent the industry into turmoil.

2. Everyone is hiring right now. Everyone. And there aren’t enough bodies to fill seats. It is incumbent upon the professional aviators out on the line to not rely solely on someone else to call a spade a spade. ‘This guy is dangerous, but the system will get him’ should not be an acceptable answer to someone who lacks the basic skill and competence to be at the controls. I’m not advocating to ruin someone’s career. But I think it’s safe to say we as a whole need to be less passive about policing each other. How many other pilots flew with this guy and probably said, ‘never again.’ Just adding links to the chain in my opinion.
JonGoodsell764 is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 09:23 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Default

Originally Posted by JonGoodsell764 View Post

2. Everyone is hiring right now. Everyone. And there aren’t enough bodies to fill seats. It is incumbent upon the professional aviators out on the line to not rely solely on someone else to call a spade a spade. ‘This guy is dangerous, but the system will get him’ should not be an acceptable answer to someone who lacks the basic skill and competence to be at the controls. I’m not advocating to ruin someone’s career. But I think it’s safe to say we as a whole need to be less passive about policing each other. How many other pilots flew with this guy and probably said, ‘never again.’ Just adding links to the chain in my opinion.
I think most of us are guilty of this. Good points
NovemberBravo is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 10:11 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 293
Default

During my capacity as a check airman I always used a very simple analogy that enabled me to make the always conflicting and difficult decision to unsat a candidate: Would I be willing to put my wife and kids on a jet with this candidate acting as the pilot? If the answer was no then how in good conscience could I expect other innocent families to put their lives in his/her hands. Very simple acid test. In my career I have only come across a couple of check airmen that took pleasure in failing candidates, but if you are not willing to do it then don't accept the assignment. By all means set folks up for sucess but they must be able to perform, period.
I would like to add that the earlier comments identifying a couple of pilots and their performance by some offensive nick-names is staggeringly stupid and unhelpful on every level. I feel ashamed that we can do that to each other and expect to be viewed as professional.
Atrasaty is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 11:48 AM
  #159  
Retired.
 
Csy Mon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 415
Default

. You're contradicting yourself. Why did you bring up race, then say there was actually no money for retraining? Sounds like you have some sort of hangup..
Only Hangup I have is that some airlines keep certain pilots onboard despite poor performance.
Of course there are bad pilots of every color, sex, nationality and all that but a white male can never sue for discrimination, easier to let go.
I worked in the training department, seen it first hand.
Csy Mon is offline  
Old 12-22-2019, 01:28 PM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: ERJ
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by Csy Mon View Post
Only Hangup I have is that some airlines keep certain pilots onboard despite poor performance.
Of course there are bad pilots of every color, sex, nationality and all that but a white male can never sue for discrimination, easier to let go.
I worked in the training department, seen it first hand.
I suppose that would be a consequence of history, assuming what you say is true. Though, with only your word, I find it hard to believe the head of an airline training department is scared to unsat deficient pilots because they could possibly claim discrimination. In fact this particular pilot was failed and let go by multiple carriers, including a failure at Atlas. The very incident we’re talking about proves your theory incorrect. I think the reason Atlas hired and retained a pilot with such a poor training history has more to do with their need to fill seats, rather than fear of a discrimination lawsuit.
poopplop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Birdsmash
Cargo
14
12-07-2018 12:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices