Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Here's a challenge...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2007 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
groovinaviator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: CL65 Captain
Default Here's a challenge...

Ok this is a little random... A friend of mine is doing an internship at a cargo carrier with 747-200/300's and every day they ask her some obscure question about aviation and she and the other interns have to come up with the answer by the next day. After talking to her I told her to start asking all these old guys questions and see if she could stump them... this being said...

I was wondering if anyone knew any really obscure fact about anything relating to the 747-200 or -300...

Any and all input is greatly appreciated. We'll see who has the most random info!
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 04:35 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
Default

- Why is the cockpit up above the main cabin?

a: Because the Boeing brains concieved of a supersonic future for the airlines, with everybody flying the SST in pax service.

The 747 was viewed as a stop-gap and therefore destined for freighter service. The cockpit was elevated to allow for nose loading.

Bonus points: how was the height of the main cabin determined?

A: High enough to accomodate conex containers. It was actually envisioned that the same shipping containers would be used for ships, trains, trucks and planes. Nobody told them that a 20' container has a 5000# empty weight......
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 07:21 AM
  #3  
MaydayMark's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Huck
- Why is the cockpit up above the main cabin?

a: Because the Boeing brains concieved of a supersonic future for the airlines, with everybody flying the SST in pax service.

The 747 was viewed as a stop-gap and therefore destined for freighter service. The cockpit was elevated to allow for nose loading.

Bonus points: how was the height of the main cabin determined?

A: High enough to accomodate conex containers. It was actually envisioned that the same shipping containers would be used for ships, trains, trucks and planes. Nobody told them that a 20' container has a 5000# empty weight......

I think Huck is close to the correct answer. Having once flown 747's back in the day ... I always understood that the 747 was originally designed for the USAF competition that Lockheed won with the C-5. Boeing was able to interest PanAm in the redesigned passenger version and the rest is history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747#History
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 08:35 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
Default

At the time, it was widely thought that the 747 would be superseded in the future by supersonic transport (SST) aircraft. So Boeing designed the 747 so that it could easily be adapted to carry freight, knowing that if and when sales of the passenger version dried up, the plane could remain in production as a cargo transport. The cockpit was therfore placed on a shortened upper deck so that a nose cone loading door could be included, thus creating the 747's distinctive "bulge".

Q.
E.
D.....
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 08:45 AM
  #5  
groovinaviator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: CL65 Captain
Default

Any really obscure systems questions/knowledge?
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 09:07 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark
I think Huck is close to the correct answer. Having once flown 747's back in the day ... I always understood that the 747 was originally designed for the USAF competition that Lockheed won with the C-5. Boeing was able to interest PanAm in the redesigned passenger version and the rest is history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747#History
I remember hearing this as well. I also heard that one of the reasons Lockeed won the contract was the space program. Lockheed was building a large portion of the equipment for NASA. However, they were not making enough money to keep doing so, had the goverment not awarded them the C-5, they would not have made enough money to keep producing space equipment, setting the space program back.
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 09:30 AM
  #7  
lear24's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
Any really obscure systems questions/knowledge?
How about:

Q: What will cause the static inverter to run without the standby power ON light illuminating?

A: Fueling with the battery power switch on the wing runs the inverter to power the gauges outside, with no indication of the inverter running inside (no standby power on light).
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 10:17 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
Ok this is a little random... A friend of mine is doing an internship at a cargo carrier with 747-200/300's and every day they ask her some obscure question about aviation and she and the other interns have to come up with the answer by the next day. After talking to her I told her to start asking all these old guys questions and see if she could stump them... this being said...

I was wondering if anyone knew any really obscure fact about anything relating to the 747-200 or -300...

Any and all input is greatly appreciated. We'll see who has the most random info!
Does your "friend" have really big hooters???
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 10:19 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
Default

What is the hump in the fuselage for?

The captain's wallet....
Reply
Old 05-26-2007 | 04:06 PM
  #10  
Rottweiler's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Default A sure stumper....

How many parts of a 747 are made out of wood?

Answer........



3
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Pilot Health
155
09-03-2018 12:36 PM
MikeInTx
Flight Schools and Training
11
05-25-2007 03:25 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
5
05-23-2007 01:11 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
0
03-15-2006 08:51 AM
Freight Dog
Major
0
05-30-2005 11:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices