Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   News: Amazon Air closes Texas facility (SKF) (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/146394-news-amazon-air-closes-texas-facility-skf.html)

hercretired 02-19-2024 09:32 PM

News: Amazon Air closes Texas facility (SKF)
 
https://www.freightwaves.com/news/am...ing-65-workers


Amazon Air is closing its air cargo operation in San Antonio, which will result in 65 contract workers employed with Worldwide Flight Services Inc. to be laid off.
The Seattle-based e-commerce giant did not provide a reason for the facility’s closure. Amazon Air is Amazon’s in-house cargo airline.“We’re always evaluating our operations to better serve our customers and have made the decision to stop operations at Kelly Field,” Amazon spokesperson Sam Stephenson said in an email to FreightWaves. “Worldwide Flight Services is a valued partner and we’ll continue working with them at other locations. This decision will not impact customer deliveries in the San Antonio area.”

Clue32 02-20-2024 07:59 AM

Meh, it was like, one 737 flight per day. Austin is 90 minutes away by truck and has 5 or 6 flights a day.

Makes business sense to me. Especially if the rumors of the restrictions on operating times and flexibility are true.

SealingStemBolt 02-20-2024 02:51 PM


Originally Posted by Clue32 (Post 3771382)
Meh, it was like, one 737 flight per day. Austin is 90 minutes away by truck and has 5 or 6 flights a day.

It seems Amazon built redundant air operations all over the place. Take ONT/RIV/SBD or TPA/LAL/MIA for examples. I assumed it was to do a ”bake off” of various airports, municipalities or even style of operations to see what works best. SKF definitely had issues with the Air Force allowing operations at odd hours so it looks like AUS won the prize.

astray 02-20-2024 09:43 PM


Originally Posted by SealingStemBolt (Post 3771545)
It seems Amazon built redundant air operations all over the place. Take ONT/RIV/SBD or TPA/LAL/MIA for examples. I assumed it was to do a ”bake off” of various airports, municipalities or even style of operations to see what works best. SKF definitely had issues with the Air Force allowing operations at odd hours so it looks like AUS won the prize.

FedEx outbid AMZ on the piece of land they wanted at ONT, so they were forced to expand at SBD, but the airport layout and location isn't that favorable for all weather ops, hence RIV...

Elevation 02-21-2024 09:30 PM

It's pretty shrewd, when you think about it. There's the obvious benefit of closing a facility that's not making money. There's also some longer term benefits. If any city tries to see what they can get from Amazon, they can shift their business elsewhere at a moment's notice. Moreover they've demonstrated that they will do just that, so fewer cities will be willing to call Amazon's bluff.

From our perspective this doesn't seem like a big deal. The commerce is going to move from different locations, but it's still going to move. Amazon treats cities like they're subcontractors. That's the way of things.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands