Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
News: Amazon Air closes Texas facility (SKF) >

News: Amazon Air closes Texas facility (SKF)

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

News: Amazon Air closes Texas facility (SKF)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2024 | 09:32 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 28
Default News: Amazon Air closes Texas facility (SKF)

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/am...ing-65-workers

Amazon Air is closing its air cargo operation in San Antonio, which will result in 65 contract workers employed with Worldwide Flight Services Inc. to be laid off.
The Seattle-based e-commerce giant did not provide a reason for the facility’s closure. Amazon Air is Amazon’s in-house cargo airline.“We’re always evaluating our operations to better serve our customers and have made the decision to stop operations at Kelly Field,” Amazon spokesperson Sam Stephenson said in an email to FreightWaves. “Worldwide Flight Services is a valued partner and we’ll continue working with them at other locations. This decision will not impact customer deliveries in the San Antonio area.”
Reply
Old 02-20-2024 | 07:59 AM
  #2  
Clue32's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Army
15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 944
Likes: 12
From: 747 FO
Default

Meh, it was like, one 737 flight per day. Austin is 90 minutes away by truck and has 5 or 6 flights a day.

Makes business sense to me. Especially if the rumors of the restrictions on operating times and flexibility are true.
Reply
Old 02-20-2024 | 02:51 PM
  #3  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 92
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Clue32
Meh, it was like, one 737 flight per day. Austin is 90 minutes away by truck and has 5 or 6 flights a day.
It seems Amazon built redundant air operations all over the place. Take ONT/RIV/SBD or TPA/LAL/MIA for examples. I assumed it was to do a ”bake off” of various airports, municipalities or even style of operations to see what works best. SKF definitely had issues with the Air Force allowing operations at odd hours so it looks like AUS won the prize.
Reply
Old 02-20-2024 | 09:43 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2022
Posts: 207
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by SealingStemBolt
It seems Amazon built redundant air operations all over the place. Take ONT/RIV/SBD or TPA/LAL/MIA for examples. I assumed it was to do a ”bake off” of various airports, municipalities or even style of operations to see what works best. SKF definitely had issues with the Air Force allowing operations at odd hours so it looks like AUS won the prize.
FedEx outbid AMZ on the piece of land they wanted at ONT, so they were forced to expand at SBD, but the airport layout and location isn't that favorable for all weather ops, hence RIV...
Reply
Old 02-21-2024 | 09:30 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 23
Default

It's pretty shrewd, when you think about it. There's the obvious benefit of closing a facility that's not making money. There's also some longer term benefits. If any city tries to see what they can get from Amazon, they can shift their business elsewhere at a moment's notice. Moreover they've demonstrated that they will do just that, so fewer cities will be willing to call Amazon's bluff.

From our perspective this doesn't seem like a big deal. The commerce is going to move from different locations, but it's still going to move. Amazon treats cities like they're subcontractors. That's the way of things.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Birdsmash
Cargo
74
06-11-2019 10:51 AM
FlyPurdue
Cargo
25
12-23-2018 03:27 AM
TonyWilliams
Foreign
116
07-30-2018 07:55 AM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM
flystraightin
Major
4
05-31-2006 06:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices