![]() |
Who is going where?
What do you guys think on this next bid? I think:
FDA CA slots will be filled by WB FO's (most with those that bid SIBA anyway) FDA FO slots filled by some NB SO's but mostly Purple Eggrolls/Crouisants Which means, we HAVE to begin hiring again, right? Do we have a pool now? If so, how many? |
Don't know but it is a lot smaller today then it was yesterday.
We will fill the slots, you can bet on it. But we are no longer every ones first choice. |
There is always STV
|
We don't have to hire anyone
|
Originally Posted by magic rat
(Post 212535)
FDA CA slots will be filled by NB FO's (most with those that bid SIBA anyway)
Where do you work? It's been a while since FDX 72s had SIBA, and a long time since we had European SIBA. Do we have other NBs I don't know about? |
Originally Posted by magic rat
(Post 212535)
Which means, we HAVE to begin hiring again, right?
Haven't bothered looking at the other bid packs, but expect the -10 is heavy with RSV lines...therefore the pending excess bid. Who knows what the next bid will bring. Remember, bean counters rule. |
I think that since this LOA is such of an enhancement to the CBA that my seniority will increase, because obviously the FDA's will go very senior. I even heard today that the union office might be moved to HKG since all of the MEC guys are going to move over there with the enhanced package.:eek:
|
My bad fdx727, I meant WB FO's...I fix.
|
Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver
(Post 212556)
I think that since this LOA is such of an enhancement to the CBA that my seniority will increase, because obviously the FDA's will go very senior. I even heard today that the union office might be moved to HKG since all of the MEC guys are going to move over there with the enhanced package.:eek:
|
Originally Posted by magic rat
(Post 212562)
My bad fdx727, I meant WB FO's...I fix.
|
Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
(Post 212606)
Sallright, just confusing as originally posted. Although, I'll bet a lot of CDG Capts are ex-NB FOs. That's quite a pay jump ($108 to $180 based on second year pay,) even at Paris prices.
|
Do you think they'll fill all the seats or need to hire into them?
Do we have a pool still? |
If we were "smart" enough to vote this in I'm sure we'll have plenty of folks "smart" enough to bid those left seats. Right seats, maybe not that "smart". Might have to recruit some really "smart" newhires for that.
I sure hope they will know who to thank when they get their ALPA spiel during indoc. FJ |
Guess:
HKG CA = Filled by very junior wide body FO's from ANC and SFS (as junior as guys with 2 years seniority) HKG FO = Filled by a couple of SFS FOs who have vested interests in Asia other than airplanes (own real estate, own businesses, too many Asian kids to feed, etc) and the rest filled by new hires with SJS (Shiny Jet Syndrome) CDG CA and FO = no educated guess on that one. My MEC speaks for me, and it's saying I am a complete puss y who will gladly make any sacrifice to help Fred bank an extra nickel. |
HKG Capt's = SFS Capts and SFS F/O's
HKG F/O's = SFS F/O's and 72 S/O's, no new hires needed CDG Capt's = 1/3 wide body capts, the rest airbus guys, maybe a couple 72 Capt's CDG F/O's = boeing F/O's and S/O's My bet is no new hires required to fill these spots. . . If 68% voted for. . there are plenty of people thinking about bidding it. . . Then again . . I could be wrong |
Originally Posted by magic rat
(Post 212631)
Do you think they'll fill all the seats or need to hire into them?
Do we have a pool still? The "educated" guess that I've heard from my fellow poolies is that there are between 25-50 of us...but that is still a guess... |
A Losing $ proposition?
Originally Posted by Intlpilot
(Post 212702)
CDG Capt's = 1/3 wide body capts, the rest airbus guys, maybe a couple
72 Capt's Then again . . I could be wrong Have you looked at the $ a WB SIBA CAP would give up just to keep flying the stuff he's doing SIBA? HELL of a pay cut! (Domestic is even more of a strech.) I don't think that's going to happen, even if he's a SIBA bus guy. Maybe the senior current SIBA f/o's, but not the capts. Most of the current SIBA guys are bidding for QOL. Min departures, max pay. Shave the deadhead days down, etc. What will be just as interesting is if they decide to "merge" the current problematic excess with the next MOAB. Either way, the next few weeks should be interesting. $0.02 |
Hey Subic guys/gals, whats the word on the streets? How many current SFS's folks plan on moving to HKG? Bet alot of those folks move back to the states with this "spectacular" LOA. Have fun on that 5 hr ground transpo to the hub, just in time for that 15 hr flight to Paris.
|
Originally Posted by BoxFlyer
(Post 212730)
Hey Subic guys/gals, whats the word on the streets? How many current SFS's folks plan on moving to HKG? Bet alot of those folks move back to the states with this "spectacular" LOA. Have fun on that 5 hr ground transpo to the hub, just in time for that 15 hr flight to Paris.
|
Originally Posted by skypine27
(Post 212672)
Guess:
My MEC speaks for me, and it's saying I am a complete puss y who will gladly make any sacrifice to help Fred bank an extra nickel. |
Originally Posted by a300fr8dog
(Post 212725)
What will be just as interesting is if they decide to "merge" the current problematic excess with the next MOAB. Either way, the next few weeks should be interesting. $0.02 SeeDub |
Originally Posted by Intlpilot
(Post 212702)
HKG Capt's = SFS Capts and SFS F/O's
HKG F/O's = SFS F/O's and 72 S/O's, no new hires needed CDG Capt's = 1/3 wide body capts, the rest airbus guys, maybe a couple 72 Capt's CDG F/O's = boeing F/O's and S/O's My bet is no new hires required to fill these spots. . . If 68% voted for. . there are plenty of people thinking about bidding it. . . Then again . . I could be wrong Int'l, As a SFS Captain, I will not be bidding HKG. Although I wanted to, that option was taken away with the LOA. I would've been better off with our current contract. To those that voted yes to help out the guys who did want to go...thanks. There will be one or two SFS Captains who will take it. I'm sure the Captain who already lives and owns a home there will. A couple others have homes and families in Asia. Perhaps they will. That's it. As for the F/O's going over as Captains, that's more plausible. Except of course, those with children. You seem to imply that because 68% voted for the LOA that there are quite a few thinking about bidding it. I disagree. Almost everyone that I heard that was voting for, were doing so for the benefit of those that did bid it. You know $2700 was better than nothing. Many wanted that added "scope protection" Well, for those thinking about it, do your research(our NC certainly didn't), and bid accordingly. I've certainly enjoyed the flying here in SFS. I look forward to going home. |
Originally Posted by Underdog
(Post 213226)
Int'l, As a SFS Captain, I will not be bidding HKG. Although I wanted to, that option was taken away with the LOA. I would've been better off with our current contract. To those that voted yes to help out the guys who did want to go...thanks. There will be one or two SFS Captains who will take it. I'm sure the Captain who already lives and owns a home there will. A couple others have homes and families in Asia. Perhaps they will. That's it. As for the F/O's going over as Captains, that's more plausible. Except of course, those with children.
You seem to imply that because 68% voted for the LOA that there are quite a few thinking about bidding it. I disagree. Almost everyone that I heard that was voting for, were doing so for the benefit of those that did bid it. You know $2700 was better than nothing. Many wanted that added "scope protection" Well, for those thinking about it, do your research(our NC certainly didn't), and bid accordingly. I've certainly enjoyed the flying here in SFS. I look forward to going home. First, I voted NO, but doesn't the LOA allow you to choose the original CBA FDA package ? I thought that was the the choice of the pilot ? Just wondering. |
Originally Posted by 2cylinderdriver
(Post 213308)
Underdog,
First, I voted NO, but doesn't the LOA allow you to choose the original CBA FDA package ? I thought that was the the choice of the pilot ? Just wondering. |
Originally Posted by Daniel Larusso
(Post 213309)
I think he and several others don't like the tax equalization consequences that are now imposed under both options. There are several threads on here that discuss why it isn't such a good deal in HKG with a 17% tax rate and a pretty high US housing tax exclusion.
|
We also gave up the, up to $20,000, FDA bonus from the CBA sec. 6 option.
|
If the pilots who bid CDG use "buying power" (Euro conversion, 20% VAT, tuition) as thier decision point, you'll see only NB SO's without school aged children bid 757 CAP, Any one else will take a substantial pay cut. New hires will fill the FO slots. Unknown for Hong Kong.
|
Originally Posted by Underdog
(Post 213226)
Int'l, As a SFS Captain, I will not be bidding HKG. Although I wanted to, that option was taken away with the LOA. I would've been better off with our current contract. To those that voted yes to help out the guys who did want to go...thanks. There will be one or two SFS Captains who will take it. I'm sure the Captain who already lives and owns a home there will. A couple others have homes and families in Asia. Perhaps they will. That's it. As for the F/O's going over as Captains, that's more plausible. Except of course, those with children.
|
Originally Posted by Busboy
(Post 213334)
We also gave up the, up to $20,000, FDA bonus from the CBA sec. 6 option.
|
Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
(Post 213369)
Has anyone actually been paid that sect. 6E1e bonus since the initial opening of SFS? Reading through that section makes it sound pretty much optional for the company to pay it. Kinda like a bribe.
Must not be enough "over 53" guys coming back to make it worth the MEC's time.:eek: |
Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
(Post 213369)
Has anyone actually been paid that sect. 6E1e bonus since the initial opening of SFS? Reading through that section makes it sound pretty much optional for the company to pay it. Kinda like a bribe.
However, I would think they would have had to bribe a few to get to these FDAs. But, its water under the bridge. It's certainly irrelevant for these FDAs. Maybe the SFS(Sioux Falls?) folks could answer that. |
Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
(Post 213369)
Has anyone actually been paid that sect. 6E1e bonus since the initial opening of SFS? Reading through that section makes it sound pretty much optional for the company to pay it. Kinda like a bribe.
|
And you get 79 CH to move back.
|
Originally Posted by skypine27
(Post 213412)
Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
(Post 213369)
Has anyone actually been paid that sect. 6E1e bonus since the initial opening of SFS? Reading through that section makes it sound pretty much optional for the company to pay it. Kinda like a bribe. . |
True but, the way I read the section; if no one is getting the bonus it is because the MEC isn't contesting it. How do you read it?
|
That's the way I read it, too.
Like, they have to agree...Or it goes to the system board. Of course, I never got the "cats and dogs" for the contract explaining what everything meant. |
Originally Posted by TonyC
(Post 213464)
Maybe you should read Sect 6.E.1.e. before you answer -- you're apparently confused. It has nothing to do with 79 Credit Hours.
. |
e. In addition to the relocation allowance provided in Section 6.C.2., a pilot, other than a pilot assigned to an FDA location as his first crew position, may be eligible for an FDA bonus as follows:
i. The amount of the bonus, if any, shall be determined by the Company after consultation with the Association. ii. In no case shall an FDA bonus exceed $20,000 for each Captain or $15,000 for each First and Second Officer. iii.The Company may condition a pilot's eligibility to receive or retain the bonus on his activation at the FDA location and/or his service at the FDA location for a minimum period of time. In no case, however, shall the service requirement at any FDA exceed 4 years. The minimum period for the FDA in Subic Bay shall remain 3 years. iv. If the Company and the Association disagree as to the amount of an FDA bonus, if any, the disagreement may be submitted for resolution to the System Board. The System Board shall lack jurisdiction to establish FDA bonuses in excess of the maximums established in Section 6.E.1.e.ii. (above). v. A pilot shall not be eligible for an additional FDA bonus as a result of a change of crew status within the same FDA location. Has the company consulted with the association IAW i?Has the company established a time limit to receive the bonus? In SFS the minimum is 3 years. Has the Union appealed the amount to the system board? Do these sound like legitimate questions to see how much support someone at an FDA will get from the union? |
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
(Post 213511)
e. In addition to the relocation allowance provided in Section 6.C.2., a pilot, other than a pilot assigned to an FDA location as his first crew position, may be eligible for an FDA bonus as follows: [INDENT]i. The amount of the bonus, if any, shall be determined by the Company after consultation with the Association.
Doesn't appear as if the MEC has anything to say about it, other than what the amount is if the company pays it. |
Originally Posted by TonyC
(Post 213464)
Maybe you should read Sect 6.E.1.e. before you answer -- you're apparently confused. It has nothing to do with 79 Credit Hours.
. I stand corrected. I did not read the quoted section when I answered with the 79 CH remark. Yes, everyone gets their 79 CH to come to SFS (except new hires), and everyone gets the 79 CH when they leave (either excessed out, and/or leaving own their own accord providing they have met the 3 year commitment). And no, I don't know anyone who has been paid the "20 K / 15 K bonus". Maybe just the first round of guys who got here when the base first opened, I have not asked them about that. I miss-thought, when I read the word "bonus" in the previous person's post, my mind went to the 79 credit hour payment. You are correct, this is not a bonus, but a mandatory contractual payment. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:45 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands