Why not the 747-400F
#21
2007
3,130 6,670 213.1 30.4 "
vs.
" Labor
The airline business is labor intensive. Wages, salaries and benefits represented approximately 31 percent of the Company’s consolidated operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007.
"
source: http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/...0014&Type=HTML
filled 2/2/08
3,130 6,670 213.1 30.4 "
vs.
" Labor
The airline business is labor intensive. Wages, salaries and benefits represented approximately 31 percent of the Company’s consolidated operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007.
"
source: http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/...0014&Type=HTML
filled 2/2/08
I don't have it in me to go look up fuel vs. labor costs for other airlines, but I would think that AMR is in the minority of companies whose labor costs still exceeds fuel. Also, I am going to surmise that its only been in probably the last year, maybe two years, that fuel costs has exceeded labor costs for those airlines that are in that circumstance. Generally speaking, of course.
#22
#23
Fed-Ex cancelled their A380 orders after all of its technical problems delayed its completion. Fed-Ex decided to order the 777F to replace the cancelled Airbus orders.
My question is since Fed-Ex wanted size, why did they choose the 777F over the 747-400F? Do both carry a similar volume? Was that even an option Fed-Ex considered? Is the 777F a stretch model (-300F)?
My question is since Fed-Ex wanted size, why did they choose the 777F over the 747-400F? Do both carry a similar volume? Was that even an option Fed-Ex considered? Is the 777F a stretch model (-300F)?
Fact: Fred Smith said you can't make money with 747s.
I heard also that he said the only chance of FedEx flying 747s would be over his dead body. He doesn't like Boeing (well-known) and doesn't want 747s.
I'm sure the equation has changed today because of the price of fuel, but that was not a factor years ago when everyone was ordering the 747s (-400F, -8s).
Side note: FedEx has several fuel scenarios ($3.50/gallon and $5.00/gallon being the major ones). They said that if it gets within this range, they are seriously considering mothballing all 727s within 2 years and using remaining aircraft to deliver packages. I guess the software says that with multiple legs on the MD10s and Airbus they can get to 98% of the places with existing planes until the 757s can fill in the gaps. I'm sure the "optimizer" is being used to construct the schedules. Feeder aircraft can be used for the 2%.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Side note: FedEx has several fuel scenarios ($3.50/gallon and $5.00/gallon being the major ones). They said that if it gets within this range, they are seriously considering mothballing all 727s within 2 years and using remaining aircraft to deliver packages. I guess the software says that with multiple legs on the MD10s and Airbus they can get to 98% of the places with existing planes until the 757s can fill in the gaps. I'm sure the "optimizer" is being used to construct the schedules. Feeder aircraft can be used for the 2%.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post