Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - History Repeating itself? >

FDX - History Repeating itself?

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - History Repeating itself?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2008, 04:37 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by No 65 for me View Post
How many times do you guys have to bend over before you realize that you do NOT have a say in anything this union does?
These guys are going to do whatever THEY feel has to be done regardless of how you guys/gals feel,i.e. age 65. We were "polled" and it was unanimous, we did not want the rule change. Union response: tough, we know better than you guys. We're going to support it.
Lump sum option as a retirement option. It was one of the 5 cornerstones in the pre-negotiation survey's. Union response: tough, we know better than you guys. It's out!
It goes on and on. You really don't have a say around here because these guys really do feel they are smarter than us.
You need to VOTE people, Get involved. The number of people who never return a vote ballot is pathetic. The only time ANYone gets involved is around contract time. Sad.
I-96 was the beginning of the end. And if you don't know what that is, then shame on this union.
You're right about one thing. They seem to do things that they think are right. Kind of like their current stance regarding drawing down BLGs across the board so that no one gets furloughed. No matter how many guys get up in the crew room and say "Furlough them, it's part of the airline business", I'm glad that they seem to represent all of the seniority list.

As for lump sum retirement, if you wanted an A plan that becomes unstable like USAir and Delta, then have at it, what a brilliant idea. Let me see, let's have all of the guys retiring take ALL of their money out of the A Plan at the same time, thereby reducing the amount of money that can compound. Sure, it works well for those retiring, but it greatly reduces the chance that it will be there for everyone else on property, especially the new hire.

But go ahead, you got yours.
MD Abuser is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 06:13 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

My guess is MD Abuser is part of the unions increased comm plan. Along with web video we get direct posting by one of the top 3. I like it.

If they took a poll on furlough it would not win.

If only they hadn't had a lump sum option at US Air they would have kept the A Plan through BK huh?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 01:21 PM
  #13  
On Reserve
 
No 65 for me's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 16
Default

Does anyone know how much money is in our pension fund? BILLION'$. Do you really think that 75 to 100 guys per year are going to deplete the pension fund? We earn aprroximately $1 billion a year in interest. Taking 85 cents on the dollar for an 18 year retirement will net you about 1.8 million. I'll take it and run. It's not an "I've got mine, screw you" attitude, it's "I'd like to take most of what I've earned after 28 years and manage it myself, thank you". This way, if you drop dead at 63 or 64 or even 69, then at least your heir's will be taken care of and not have to live on a mere fraction of what you would have gotten via your pension plan. Why is that so hard for people to understand?
No 65 for me is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 01:34 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by No 65 for me View Post
Does anyone know how much money is in our pension fund? BILLION'$. Do you really think that 75 to 100 guys per year are going to deplete the pension fund? We earn aprroximately $1 billion a year in interest. Taking 85 cents on the dollar for an 18 year retirement will net you about 1.8 million. I'll take it and run. It's not an "I've got mine, screw you" attitude, it's "I'd like to take most of what I've earned after 28 years and manage it myself, thank you". This way, if you drop dead at 63 or 64 or even 69, then at least your heir's will be taken care of and not have to live on a mere fraction of what you would have gotten via your pension plan. Why is that so hard for people to understand?
Agreed and in addition it allows you to isolate yourself from company and union games when you no longer have a vote.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 01:43 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
No 65 for me's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 16
Default

I couldn't have said it better myself. Finally, someone who actually get's it!!!!
No 65 for me is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 03:07 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
My guess is MD Abuser is part of the unions increased comm plan. Along with web video we get direct posting by one of the top 3. I like it.

If they took a poll on furlough it would not win.

If only they hadn't had a lump sum option at US Air they would have kept the A Plan through BK huh?
So because I don't buy into your line of thinking I work at the union. Those guys can have their jobs. I much prefer posting here in anonymity and not having any responsibility to back anything up. Throwing verbal grenades into the midst of the huddled masses is much easier.

As for the US Air A Plan, one of the components of it's termination in bankruptcy was the very low level of funding, due in part to reduced growth based upon lower average earnings growth tied to the low interest rates and with pilots withdrawing million dollar plus lump sums. Add up all of the small stuff and it equals big stuff.

Have at it Lag.
MD Abuser is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 04:03 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by MD Abuser View Post
So because I don't buy into your line of thinking I work at the union. Those guys can have their jobs. I much prefer posting here in anonymity and not having any responsibility to back anything up. Throwing verbal grenades into the midst of the huddled masses is much easier.

As for the US Air A Plan, one of the components of it's termination in bankruptcy was the very low level of funding, due in part to reduced growth based upon lower average earnings growth tied to the low interest rates and with pilots withdrawing million dollar plus lump sums. Add up all of the small stuff and it equals big stuff.

Have at it Lag.

No one has to agree with me all the time; I certainly don't. I was just pointing out the eerie coincidence of your 15 previous posts as either defending a MEC position of an officer's appearance. My apologies for suspecting you to be part of the new comm plan.

Also accept my appology for suspecting neither USAIR or Delta A Plans would have survived BK. The reduction in future obligations were what "sold" the BK judge. But then I don't think anyone will have an A Plan in 20 years.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 04:18 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Just curious...Does anyone know how long USAir and Delta had the A-fund "lump-sum" provision available? And, does any solvent airline currently have it?

It seems that the only danger anyone ever speaks of, when they argue against a lump-sum provision, only concerns an A-fund at a company going bankrupt.

So using that logic...I guess we should base all of our negotiating goals on what would happen if FDX entered bankruptcy? Just in case?
Busboy is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 05:27 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
Just curious...Does anyone know how long USAir and Delta had the A-fund "lump-sum" provision available? And, does any solvent airline currently have it?
Just in case?
I can speak for USAir from the mid 80's. USair had it then. It wasn't a carte Blanche Lump Sum. Every year at a certain point (Oct I believe) they would run the numbers formula. It was all tied to the 10 year treasury Bond.

Based on the formula, a Quota of authorized Lump sum retirements was issued.

They would post this number and guys retiring could put in for a Lump Sum and it was first come first serve. Once they hit the majic number for that year, no more Lump sum outs were autherized. The most lump outs in any one year was about 45 as best as I can recall. And remember the 80's and mid 90's had a booming economy!

USAir had a 60% A plan back then and if a guy lived well into his 80's he had a very nice lifestyle. The lump sum guys (with 25 yrs of service) generally received approx 750-900K in cash. Back then most guys took the annunity vice the Lump.

I can't speak from authority on Delta. I don't know how long they had a Lump sum option but they did have a much more liberal Lump Sum option than USair. Many pilots @ Delta opted to jump ship in 2001-02. I don't think they had a quota cap on lump outs like USAir. As bankruptcy became enevitable guys were lined up to take the early out lump sum option. I believe their Lump sum was a 50% cash out based on future dollar value of their annuity A plan. I do know that the top end of the Delta list is pretty young (relative to the top end Nwest) due to all the pilots bailing out at the last minute.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 08-07-2008, 11:10 AM
  #20  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
No one has to agree with me all the time; I certainly don't.
I KNEW IT!!! Even you do agree with yourself sometimes! But....how do you argue with yourself?
AerisArmis is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hamfisted
Cargo
52
06-22-2008 09:19 PM
Laxrox43
Cargo
77
06-05-2008 08:28 AM
fdxflyer
Cargo
14
12-22-2007 08:43 AM
noguardbaby
Cargo
35
11-12-2007 05:34 AM
angry tanker
Cargo
20
07-10-2007 03:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices