Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
What do you FedEx guys think of this? >

What do you FedEx guys think of this?

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

What do you FedEx guys think of this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2006, 02:00 PM
  #11  
Beverage Consultant
 
Beertini's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Bartender & cabana boy
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by To Stay or Go
Hello folks, this is Tom Nicholson (UPS 747 Cpt and IPA Pres) with the EB Hotline for Saturday, March 11th.

This week saw the pilots of Federal Express, as represented by ALPA, and FedEx management move much closer to a final agreement. Industry experts believe a deal at UPS archrival FedEx could come within a matter of weeks.
According to an email sent out this afternoon from our MEC, not only did our Union and FedEx not meet last week but Capt Nicholson also has not spoken with our MEC to discuss the status of our negotiations.

We wish you guys the very best during your negotiations process but I wonder what is up with the wrong information?!

Just curious...

P.S. I agree with Tony--TWO YEARS IS TOO LONG!
Beertini is offline  
Old 03-13-2006, 02:17 PM
  #12  
jack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Help me guys, arent we in competition with UPS? Why would we want them to have a contract before we do? Let them fight their own battles.
 
Old 03-13-2006, 02:23 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by jack
Help me guys, arent we in competition with UPS? Why would we want them to have a contract before we do? Let them fight their own battles.
Because whichever group finishes last will be at a bargaining advantage.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 03-13-2006, 02:29 PM
  #14  
jack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its going to take about 6 contracts for UPS to get what Fedex has. No offense. On a side note there is no way in the world the govt. is going to let FedEx strike.
 
Old 03-13-2006, 02:34 PM
  #15  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by jack

On a side note there is no way in the world the govt. is going to let FedEx strike.

Oh?


What mechanism will they use to prevent a strike?






- The truth only hurts if it should -
TonyC is offline  
Old 03-13-2006, 02:49 PM
  #16  
jack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Remember AA back in the late 90s? And that was under Clinton! Fines, bureacratic tactics, you name it. As much weight as FDX moves , the govt cant afford a strike. The best way to get a timely contract is to fly the current contract to the extreme. Much to the dismay of many, I dont think that striking is a possibility not because of resolve but because of govt. power.
 
Old 03-13-2006, 03:00 PM
  #17  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Educate yourself on the Railway Labor Act before you start making such claims. Here's a starter:


The President may create an emergency board to investigate and report on a dispute over the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. Under the Railway Labor Act, the President may exercise his discretion to create an emergency board when the labor dispute threatens "substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive any section of the country of essential transportation service."

Creation of an emergency board delays a strike, lockout or other form of self-help, generally for 60 days. The emergency board has 30 days to issue its report. Generally, emergency boards provide recommendations for settlement of the dispute. After the emergency board reports to the President, the parties to the dispute have another 30 day cooling off period to consider the recommendations of the emergency board and to reach an agreement.

If no agreement is reached at the end of the cooling off period, then the parties may engage in self-help, including strikes, lockouts and unilateral changes in terms and conditions of employment.

A Presidential Emergency Board can delay a strike, but it can not prevent one.





- The truth only hurts if it should -
TonyC is offline  
Old 03-13-2006, 03:18 PM
  #18  
jack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yea go tell that to the ATC guys. Ill put it like this, those airplanes are going to fly whether we like it or not. What are we going to sue the company if they have replacements fly those airplanes? FDX is to much part of the fabric of the economy for it to shutdown. Thats not a bad thing. If we fly the contract. Thats a whole lot more effective than striking.

Better to be the annoying wife that wont give it up than ***** that shouts and threatens to leave. Its time to get annoying.

I dont expect that the RLA is respected as much as you would like. Ultimately the govt. has the power and it sides with Mgmt not us.
 
Old 03-13-2006, 03:50 PM
  #19  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by jack

Yea go tell that to the ATC guys. Ill put it like this, those airplanes are going to fly whether we like it or not. What are we going to sue the company if they have replacements fly those airplanes? FDX is to much part of the fabric of the economy for it to shutdown. Thats not a bad thing. If we fly the contract. Thats a whole lot more effective than striking.

Better to be the annoying wife that wont give it up than ***** that shouts and threatens to leave. Its time to get annoying.

I dont expect that the RLA is respected as much as you would like. Ultimately the govt. has the power and it sides with Mgmt not us.
Jack, you're getting emotional, and you're just flat wrong.

ATC??? How, pray tell, does ATC have anything to do with a job action?



Replacements? How long did your FAA required Indoctrination course last? By the time the Scab replacements Indoc is done, and the airplane-specific training begins, a FedEx without pilots would no longer be FedEx - - Fred can't afford to miss the "Absolutely, Positively, Overnight" guarantee ONE day, much less two weeks. If you think we can be replaced, you are grossly misinformed and severely undervalue the contribution of FedEx pilots to the FedEx system.


Fly the contract? Of course. The Company won't mind - - THEY WROTE IT!



You don't think the RLA is respected, huh? ON what data do you base that judgment? Have you run this perspective by a NWA or COMAIR pilot that walked?






- The truth only hurts if it should -
TonyC is offline  
Old 03-13-2006, 04:25 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by jack
Help me guys, arent we in competition with UPS? Why would we want them to have a contract before we do? Let them fight their own battles.
Jack, Last time I was told we are two pilot groups. You need to get it straight, FedEx and UPS are in competition together, not the two pilot groups. We want the best for the UPS pilot group. It only helps us in the long run. As far as your "6 contracts for UPS statement to get what Fedex has"( Jack, it is FedEx if you are going to work here, spell it right) I have no idea what you are trying to get at.
FR8Hauler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sasquatch
Cargo
0
06-21-2006 08:45 PM
cub pilot
Cargo
72
05-27-2006 04:02 AM
TonyC
Major
0
01-24-2006 05:21 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
3
11-30-2005 07:42 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices