Quote:
The WSJ article also outlines the crux of DHL's legal defense: they are changing vendors for a service, not merging. This is the question that will be addressed by any hearings. I am sure an army of Lawyers has been mulling over this exact question for quite some time and already know the answer.
Both groups of politicos have called the other liars and this is to be expected.
Originally Posted by jungle
The WSJ is one of the few credible large newspapers left in America. I suggest a detailed perusal of DHL's financial statement if you want to know the exact nature of their claims to losses in the US market-these figures are considered valid by both the US and German governments and are audited by an independent firm. The question of accounting irregularities has never been raised by either country.The WSJ article also outlines the crux of DHL's legal defense: they are changing vendors for a service, not merging. This is the question that will be addressed by any hearings. I am sure an army of Lawyers has been mulling over this exact question for quite some time and already know the answer.
Both groups of politicos have called the other liars and this is to be expected.
I guess we'll find out when the hearings start.