Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   World Airways (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/30596-world-airways.html)

n817aa 09-01-2008 08:43 PM

World Airways
 
Any update on hiring? Kind of quiet lately. I know they picked up some Gemini guys. Just wondering what's in store for the rest of us.
Thanks

DWN3GRN 09-01-2008 09:30 PM

I talked to a buddy of mine over there. He said they are runnin the Gemini guys through the short course. They're still hiring on the outside as far as I know. I believe they're getting a couple more 74's too..

jonnyjetprop 09-01-2008 11:55 PM

Annouced fleet expansion is 3 MD-11 (ex GAC), 1 B747F and 1 DC-10. Hring for the MD's is complete with the GAC pilots coming on board. I was told that they were still interviewing, but only for a few slots.

JetPiedmont 09-02-2008 09:11 AM


Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop (Post 454109)
Annouced fleet expansion is 3 MD-11 (ex GAC), 1 B747F and 1 DC-10. Hring for the MD's is complete with the GAC pilots coming on board. I was told that they were still interviewing, but only for a few slots.

Heard anything about a second DC-10 towards the end of the year?:D

n817aa 09-02-2008 10:51 AM

Thanks a lot. i have a friend in the pool and he was curious.

okbk 09-02-2008 11:24 AM

ATA guys in the pool will get asked first for any new DC10 spot (FO or SO) that opens up. Right now only approval from bean counters is 40 crews. Once they realize this isn't enough (which shouldn't take long, we are super short) they will give approval for more crews thus more new hire classes.

jonnyjetprop 09-02-2008 11:45 AM

I think this is the plane I mentioned. All other DC-10's are going to be for parts.


Originally Posted by JetPiedmont (Post 454241)
Heard anything about a second DC-10 towards the end of the year?:D


jonnyjetprop 09-02-2008 11:46 AM

There's quite a number of folks in the pool, that's why the additional numbers will be small.


Originally Posted by okbk (Post 454308)
ATA guys in the pool will get asked first for any new DC10 spot (FO or SO) that opens up. Right now only approval from bean counters is 40 crews. Once they realize this isn't enough (which shouldn't take long, we are super short) they will give approval for more crews thus more new hire classes.


okbk 09-02-2008 11:51 AM

agreed, from what was told in recurrent, many still in the pool.

JetPiedmont 09-03-2008 03:09 PM


Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop (Post 454323)
I think this is the plane I mentioned. All other DC-10's are going to be for parts.

OK, thanks. How soon before the recently arrived DC-10 is put in service?

WorldDC10 09-03-2008 05:01 PM

Latest bid just came out. We still need to hire 10 DC10 FO's and 17 MD11 FO's.

As OKBK said I wouldn't be at all surprised if they increase the number of crews on the DC10 for the latest addition to the fleet, everyone on the fleet is working a lot at the moment.

JetPiedmont 09-04-2008 04:21 AM


Originally Posted by WorldDC10 (Post 455233)
Latest bid just came out. We still need to hire 10 DC10 FO's and 17 MD11 FO's.

As OKBK said I wouldn't be at all surprised if they increase the number of crews on the DC10 for the latest addition to the fleet, everyone on the fleet is working a lot at the moment.

How many days a month are you gone? How many hours do you fly?

dutch747 09-04-2008 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by JetPiedmont (Post 455501)
How many days a month are you gone? How many hours do you fly?

For the 10 guys it's really your choice. If you want to be at home, you will be out 12 - 15 days a month. If you want to earn, you can be out 18 - 24 days a month.

This isn't a hard fast rule as sometimes the guys who just want to earn a steady paycheck get shafted and are stuck out as much as 18 days; and the same for the guys who want OT, they may only work a 12 day month sometimes.


Guarantee is 12 days off a month, 6 hard where they can't touch you; 6 soft where you can be "non volunteered" - this is a rarity. One can always volunteer your off days. Pay is an extra 3.6 hours on top of whatever you have earned.

JetPiedmont 09-04-2008 05:00 PM


Originally Posted by dutch747 (Post 455653)
For the 10 guys it's really your choice. If you want to be at home, you will be out 12 - 15 days a month. If you want to earn, you can be out 18 - 24 days a month.

This isn't a hard fast rule as sometimes the guys who just want to earn a steady paycheck get shafted and are stuck out as much as 18 days; and the same for the guys who want OT, they may only work a 12 day month sometimes.


Guarantee is 12 days off a month, 6 hard where they can't touch you; 6 soft where you can be "non volunteered" - this is a rarity. One can always volunteer your off days. Pay is an extra 3.6 hours on top of whatever you have earned.

Thanks, very informative.

Since you're understaffed, do you have many reserves, or does most everyone have a regular line?

jonnyjetprop 09-05-2008 05:06 AM

Here's the way it works. We have home reserve with a short call out and a 76 hour guarentee and open time lines with a long, 16 hour call out and a 65 hour guarentee. At least 50% of the pilot force is on a open time line since alot of flying isn't finalized by the time bid lines are constructed. OTL is the junior assignment. The only question is what you consider reserve?





Originally Posted by JetPiedmont (Post 455983)
Thanks, very informative.

Since you're understaffed, do you have many reserves, or does most everyone have a regular line?


Bill Lumberg 09-05-2008 05:46 AM


Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop (Post 456218)
Here's the way it works. We have home reserve with a short call out and a 76 hour guarentee and open time lines with a long, 16 hour call out and a 65 hour guarentee. At least 50% of the pilot force is on a open time line since alot of flying isn't finalized by the time bid lines are constructed. OTL is the junior assignment. The only question is what you consider reserve?

Thanks for all the good information. Is there a big difference between the DC10 and MD11 flying in terms of routes these days? I realize they can fly anywhere on demand at any time. That said, do the DC10s tend to do more Europe and Middle East while the MD11s do those places plus Asia, South America, etc.?

dutch747 09-05-2008 06:14 AM


Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg (Post 456229)
Thanks for all the good information. Is there a big difference between the DC10 and MD11 flying in terms of routes these days? I realize they can fly anywhere on demand at any time. That said, do the DC10s tend to do more Europe and Middle East while the MD11s do those places plus Asia, South America, etc.?

The 10 does almost exclusively military flying. So you can bet on Europe and SE Asia. But we also pick up a lot of ADHOC work from the military that takes us out into the Pacific. I spent most of my summer flying HNL - Guam - Darwin - Japan and ANC. The MD flies everywhere. And I mean EVERYWHERE. The MD flies contracts for Air France and Lufthansa (Just to name a few) as well as Military flights.

jonnyjetprop 09-05-2008 12:18 PM

The biggest difference is that the MD-11 crews are doing more and more cargo, while the DC-10 is picking up more of the passenger flying. Both do world wide operations.

JetPiedmont 09-06-2008 03:28 PM


Originally Posted by dutch747 (Post 456247)
The 10 does almost exclusively military flying. So you can bet on Europe and SE Asia. But we also pick up a lot of ADHOC work from the military that takes us out into the Pacific. I spent most of my summer flying HNL - Guam - Darwin - Japan and ANC. The MD flies everywhere. And I mean EVERYWHERE. The MD flies contracts for Air France and Lufthansa (Just to name a few) as well as Military flights.

Are the DC-10 pilots happy with the staffing level so they can fly extra, or do they wish the company would hire more pilots for the Ten?

dutch747 09-06-2008 06:10 PM


Originally Posted by JetPiedmont (Post 457046)
Are the DC-10 pilots happy with the staffing level so they can fly extra, or do they wish the company would hire more pilots for the Ten?

The Captains aren't very happy with staffing levels. But I think the FO's and SO's enjoy the ability to earn extra.

None of that matters though, manning levels are so low that we turn away flights when we have acft available; just no crews to fly them.

n817aa 09-06-2008 07:46 PM

So does anyone have an actual number of people swimming?

JetPiedmont 09-07-2008 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by dutch747 (Post 457105)
The Captains aren't very happy with staffing levels. But I think the FO's and SO's enjoy the ability to earn extra.

None of that matters though, manning levels are so low that we turn away flights when we have acft available; just no crews to fly them.

Is there any speculation around World how the election could affect the AMC/DOD flying you do, or would World stay pretty busy regardless?

Cheyenne Driver 09-07-2008 12:02 PM

Just heard from a friend there. They are extremely busy he has been out now for over 45 days. His choice. They are still hiring the Gemini and ATA pilots. Pilots with lots of time, jet and glass, personal rec. a big plus.

Guys like me with 9600 TT (mostly TProp) will have to wait.

74plb 09-07-2008 12:14 PM


Originally Posted by dutch747 (Post 457105)
The Captains aren't very happy with staffing levels. But I think the FO's and SO's enjoy the ability to earn extra.

None of that matters though, manning levels are so low that we turn away flights when we have acft available; just no crews to fly them.

I've been on the line since June, I bid for days off and haven't volunteered any days off. I did sell them a day off instead of going directly home (without required rest)after a trip to the middle East. Last month I had 80 hours for pay and worked mostly domestic legs.
Quite a few of the new FE's/FO's are selling some days off though like Dutch indicated.
I'd like to see some more cargo flying, but that tends to go senior..

Worldguy 09-07-2008 09:07 PM

the short answer is no. Both candidates are saying the same thing. No changes based on what comes out of their mouths.
WG

Originally Posted by JetPiedmont (Post 457379)
Is there any speculation around World how the election could affect the AMC/DOD flying you do, or would World stay pretty busy regardless?


⌐ AV8OR WANNABE 09-07-2008 09:23 PM


Originally Posted by Worldguy (Post 457696)
the short answer is no. Both candidates are saying the same thing. No changes based on what comes out of their mouths.
WG

Really? I tend to disagree with you. Without getting into politics too much and based on what the both candidates have said in the past - if one of them wins there will be a "surge" of military ‘return flights’ - at least for a while. If the other side wins there won’t be any “military charter surge” but the back & forth flights will be going on for some time.

What am I missing?

Radials Rule 09-07-2008 09:48 PM

If we pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan, sure, there will be a reduction of AMC flying. However, there seems to be plenty of AMC flying for us that is not associated with our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan.

With Iraq, it can go either way. However, with either candidate, it seems like we'll be in Afghanistan for quite some time.

Worldguy 09-08-2008 12:23 AM

The one thing that both have in common is that their lips are moving. That should be your first clue. There is nothing that makes me think I should believe what either has to say.
WG

jonnyjetprop 09-08-2008 01:55 AM

There's a couple of things that you have to remember with the military side:

When we pull out (both canidates say they will, the difference is when), will the troops go back to the states or will they just deploy to another country?

Even if they do go back home, will we resume other smaller deployments?

Since a portion of the flying is being flown by the scheduled carriers, will their flying drop off first?

Historically the answer is yes to all three. World will have hard times when the war is over. The other thing to think about is how much business have we not done because of the war. We haven't flown the Hadj since 2001. I feel a swarma and a cold fruit juice in my future.

wldplt 09-08-2008 05:01 AM


Originally Posted by JetPiedmont (Post 457379)
Is there any speculation around World how the election could affect the AMC/DOD flying you do, or would World stay pretty busy regardless?


Just my humble opinion but I think there's enough stuff going on with Russia and Iran to keep the coals of war burning for sometime. The world isn't getting any less dangerous.

Packer Backer 09-08-2008 05:59 AM


Originally Posted by wldplt (Post 457768)
Just my humble opinion but I think there's enough stuff going on with Russia and Iran to keep the coals of war burning for sometime. The world isn't getting any less dangerous.

That's the one thing I love about this country. There is always somebody in the world that needs to be beat up. After all, we are the international police.

pdo bump 09-08-2008 10:50 AM


Originally Posted by Packer Backer (Post 457805)
That's the one thing I love about this country. There is always somebody in the world that needs to be beat up. After all, we are the international police.

c'mon, dude. you are called Packer Backer. don't sound like such a winy, wuss. or at least change your avatar if you do.

dc8v8er 09-08-2008 01:17 PM

I think World will be busy for the foreseeable future. I have flown alot of diverse flights with many different customers, military is def the bulk. BRING BACK THE PACIFIC EXPRESS!!!

KC10 FATboy 09-08-2008 07:09 PM

Is the Pacific Express the military rotator that flew either SanFran Kadena Osan or Seattle Kadena Osan?

I was stationed at Osan and flew on the 2nd to last rotator flight home on World. Because of my job and position at the wing, I've was privy to a lot of discussion on the World rotator. I can tell you the 1 and 3-star were not particulary happy with the performance and pricing of the rotator. Interestingly enough, on one occasion, I had to book a flight on DAL/Korean Air and the ticket overall was $640 cheaper (no exaggeration).

Although I felt the rotator made the operation very easy (everyone in-processes at the same place, same day), going civilian has saved the military a lot of coin.

-Fatty

Radials Rule 09-08-2008 09:10 PM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 458340)
Is the Pacific Express the military rotator that flew either SanFran Kadena Osan or Seattle Kadena Osan?

I was stationed at Osan and flew on the 2nd to last rotator flight home on World. Because of my job and position at the wing, I've was privy to a lot of discussion on the World rotator. I can tell you the 1 and 3-star were not particulary happy with the performance and pricing of the rotator. Interestingly enough, on one occasion, I had to book a flight on DAL/Korean Air and the ticket overall was $640 cheaper (no exaggeration).

Although I felt the rotator made the operation very easy (everyone in-processes at the same place, same day), going civilian has saved the military a lot of coin.

-Fatty

On many of our trips, troops carry their unloaded firearms in the cabin. I don't think that is doable on DAL/KAL.

dutch747 09-09-2008 01:07 AM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 458340)
Is the Pacific Express the military rotator that flew either SanFran Kadena Osan or Seattle Kadena Osan?

Yes. It was actually called the Patriot Express.


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 458340)
I was stationed at Osan and flew on the 2nd to last rotator flight home on World. Because of my job and position at the wing, I've was privy to a lot of discussion on the World rotator. I can tell you the 1 and 3-star were not particulary happy with the performance and pricing of the rotator. Interestingly enough, on one occasion, I had to book a flight on DAL/Korean Air and the ticket overall was $640 cheaper (no exaggeration).

I'm confused. This was a free trip to military families. Equivalent of a military hop. I flew it when I was in the Air Force to OSAN and paid only some tax making the grand total airfare $35 for me, the wife and two kids. Don't know what your talking about but its not the Patriot Express. Some people complained about our service to the higher ups, we always gave hot meals, hot towels, it was better than any commercial economy - but some didn't see it that way.


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 458340)
Although I felt the rotator made the operation very easy (everyone in-processes at the same place, same day), going civilian has saved the military a lot of coin.-Fatty

There's a lot of talk right now about bring back this run. Apparently the new AMC Commander wants this back. Stay tuned.

jonnyjetprop 09-09-2008 02:38 AM

Everyone is right on this one. :D

The military paid the operator, World Airways in this case, a flat fee to operate the flights. An amount that was far lower than what we get for ad hoc flying. It was put out to bid and the lowest bidder won. Of course, it's not that simple, because of the AMC teaming arrangements. One team gets 60% and the other gets 40%.

The military "billed" the commands for the flying. Some commands paid more than others and the SA's paid almost nothing at all.

It was cheaper to fly commercially if your command was "paying" alot for the ticket. Also, somebody got the frequent flyer miles, if they rode a commercial flight. That was the biggest gripe.

Here's the bugger. A figure that's run around World is that the total cost to the military to fly the personel was running about four times the total cost of operating the Patriot Express. The issue was far more about how the military was billing itself, than the total cost to the tax payer.

Will it come back? If I were a betting man, I'd say yes. After the war is over. One of the big selling points was that it kept carriers like World, Omni, North American and Ryan alive and ready to serve until the next crisis. The military has come to depend on us to be there. Yes, they can activate CRAF and force the big boys to deploy more planes, but we are there ready to go. We have always been the first to fly folks in and we'll be the last to fly them out.

F15andMD11 09-09-2008 07:20 AM


On many of our trips, troops carry their unloaded firearms in the cabin. I don't think that is doable on DAL/KAL.
Not on the Patriot Express. That was a regular flt that went to stateside pax terminals, no weapons.
Yeah it was cheaper to fly NWA/Korean, but it was very convenient for a family. How easy was it to board a flt at the base? Now a family of 4 has to load up in a little van or bus to the regional airport, transfer, fly up to Korea or Japan and then push the strollers through those airports. Its been crazy from what I've heard.
Word is its coming back! Lets hope! Rumor is a new F/A class this winter, perhaps another hint.

JetPiedmont 09-09-2008 07:25 AM


Originally Posted by F15andMD11 (Post 458533)
Word is its coming back! Lets hope! Rumor is a new F/A class this winter, perhaps another hint.

Any word on DC-10 F/O, F/E new hire classes? You guys are short on the -10?

WorldDC10 09-09-2008 12:58 PM

The last bid shows 9 DC10 FO positions open, the FE/So side shows fully manned (with some in training). That assumes that we don't increase the number of crews - currently 40 for what will be 5 pax and 2 freight DC10's. I think that the assumption is that the beancounters will need to approve an increase in the total number of DC10 crews.

We also have 18 MD11 FO slots not filled after the last bid. There are no positions unfilled on the 747 with the junior Fo being just over a year on property.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands