Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS Cutting Guarantee? >

UPS Cutting Guarantee?

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS Cutting Guarantee?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2008, 02:23 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by 757Slug View Post
I’m saying that furloughing would be cheaper and better for the pilot group as a whole than to cut everyone’s wages. The pilots furloughed would still have about the same take home pay and the pilots flying would make more than if we were to cut guarantee. It would also give a peace of mind to everyone on the bottom that we would take care of them until we bring them back online.
If UPS cuts guarantee by 5 hours a FO would lose $630 and a Captain would lose over $1,150 a pay period. I would rather give the money to a furloughed pilot than back to the company.
It doesn't look like you subtracted federal income tax. state income tax, medicare tax, union dues, and who knows what else.. <g>

Also, it been posted that Cobra medical for a family is $1800 per month. How about pension credit and 401(k) contributions?

And maybe lines that have 5 hours (for example) less flying and more time off would be a good thing.

And I don't know if your assumption of unemployment insurance would be a given, and certainly not beyond some number of months.

Also, a break-even point for your example of 200 pilots furloughed would probably be fewer than a 5-hour guarantee hit. It would be a complicated function which would include the money the company saves in the future by not furloughing.

I think a more accurate accounting would be a part of any plan the IPA comes up with, if indeed one is needed.

Last edited by Roberto; 12-07-2008 at 02:40 PM.
Roberto is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 03:22 PM
  #32  
On Reserve
 
sfergson727's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: B767 PIC
Posts: 16
Default

Sorry Slug, but as a UPS pilot of two years now, and having been through the demise of one airline, and thus two years of first year pay (one here, one at another airline), your suggestion is about the dumbest idea I have ever heard. As a former ALPA FO Rep for a major airline, I have no idea why in the heck you even started it. Ridiculous all the way around. I guess it's good I was displaced to ANC in the MD, at least I don't have to listen to this kinda crap on the 757 anymore. (not that I heard it before, but if this is the trend, I'm glad I'm not there to partake in said crap)
sfergson727 is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 04:21 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

757Slug,

What about the lost wages for folks downgraded to FO from CA and FE from FO during a furlough? What about the expense to the company for retraining? I'm sure they will want to extract it out of the IPA if this is "a deal" to protect the income of higher seniority guys like you not affected during a furlough.

5 hr cut? If you are only 5 hrs overmanned then you can hold the company to the contract and make them pay. It's peanuts on the bottom line. If UPS costs out a furlough and, seriously this time, plans for one, expect a larger cut to prevent one. Expect the cut in hours to be cheaper for the company too. The expense of moving pilots downward is surprising large because you have to figure the cost of training them back into higher seats as soon as the economy recovers. Even if it is only a little bit.

If you cut your average, you will have more CAs and FOs. Some will see higher pay....

Last edited by Gunter; 12-07-2008 at 04:46 PM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 05:01 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
....What about the lost wages for folks downgraded to FO from CA and FE from FO during a furlough?
Good point, Gunter. I had not considered that part of the equation. If UPS were to furlough, rather than spread the extra pilots around the system, it would be after a round of displacements that would downgrade many.
Roberto is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 05:10 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by BoxDawg View Post
I think Slughead is a minority in this, at least I pray that he is. Go ahead sluggo, keep bouncing these ideas around so that your life isnt impacted. You have no idea what a furlough does to a family, or if you have been furloughed at one time you obviously have forgotten the pain involved.
Unfortunately I disagree with you - when it comes to it the vast majority will be voting against any kind of reduction for themselves and claim they're simply protecting the contract. Then they'll have donation drives to purchase $25 Christmas gift cards (similar to CAL pilots - not that there's anything wrong with that idea) for all furloughed to feel better about 'taking care of our own.' I feel that we have a strong union but remember that most senior pilots here have never been furloughed and if they have it was years and year ago. Therefore they simply can't fathom the effect it has on a family's finances.

I still think it'll never come to a furlough however IF the company ever decides to save money and lets the union decide how to do that - plan on the junior guys to be sacrificed.

By the way, I feel the same way about other airlines too, not just UPS. The only exception I can remember in recent times was when Airtran pilots took a temporary pay cut (or rather froze their contractual pay raises for a year or so) in order to prevent a furlough of their junior pilots right after 9/11.

Again, I don't think it'll happen but they might try to scare us with a furlough...

Last edited by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE; 12-07-2008 at 05:41 PM.
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 05:38 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 222
Default

The only reason this has come up is because of Fedex's contract. Sorry I don't have time to research the #'s but the point of their BLG reduction is not to take a pay cut, it is to take such a hit on allowable flying that the company can't furlough. To all fellow UPS guys out there, please stop doing the company's job for them.
Naven is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 06:27 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

you are right.

The min pay per line has to go down about 20% at FDX BEFORE a furlough. Our line spread is a max of 13 hrs.

There is debate in how this can be legally interpreted but it offers a disincentive for furlough. Until an intent to furlough is announced, min pay can not be changed.

Knowledge is power. Knowing that furlough is expensive means a furlough is unlikely unless the payoff is large enough.
Gunter is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 06:35 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

Mod note:

Title of thread modified to reflect OP's wishes per PM convo.
de727ups is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 05:27 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2cylinderdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 732
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
you are right.

The min pay per line has to go down about 20% at FDX BEFORE a furlough. Our line spread is a max of 13 hrs.

There is debate in how this can be legally interpreted but it offers a disincentive for furlough. Until an intent to furlough is announced, min pay can not be changed.

Knowledge is power. Knowing that furlough is expensive means a furlough is unlikely unless the payoff is large enough.
At FDX the CBA langauge is a little misleading. The provision on reducing hours has nothing to do with LINE value or BLG in FDX speak. What we have at FDX is a Minimum Bid Period Guarantee (MBPG), currently 68 hours in a 4 week bid. The CBA allows the Company to reduce the MBPG to 48 hours, essentially a new floor of pay protection, to PREVENT or DELAY a furlough. All the while FDX can build actual lines as they wish within CBA limits across different fleet types.

There is no language that says the actual lines must all be below X before a pilot can be furloughed. It could certainly prevent or delay one, but we are actually in a tenuous position because rather than try to address any overmanning through "normal" protocols (like retirement incentives) FDX can just spread the wealth and save money from not buying up lines in seats they have too many bodies in. The only ways to fix overmanning are to get more flying, or reduce staff through retirement or furlough. Anything else is just a band aid or cost saving measure.

If we had some control over the methodology and science behind "proving" a need for the use of a reduction in MBPG that would certainly help because FDX is MAKING lots of money and certainly can afford to pay us our 68 hours ! (ditto for you UPS guys)
2cylinderdriver is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 11:17 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FliFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: I was acquired, Not Hired
Posts: 1,784
Default

Slug,

I have a better suggestion, fly as much open time as possible with guys on the street, that's a help too.

Turn in your union card at your earliest convenience...thank you.

FF
192 from the bottom

Please close this thread, the topic should be divide and conquer -or-eat the young.
FliFast is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Cargo
1
11-17-2008 04:05 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM
FlyAstarJets
Cargo
38
09-27-2008 10:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices