NTSB faults FedEx pilots
05-18-2005, 07:08 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: 737 CFI
Posts: 390
NTSB faults FedEx pilots
Investigators Fault Pilots for FedEx Crash
By HILARY ROXE
The Associated Press
Tuesday, May 17, 2005; 4:39 PM
WASHINGTON -- The pilot of a FedEx cargo jet that caught fire after landing at the Memphis airport in December 2003 was largely responsible for the accident, the National Transportation Safety Board said Tuesday.
The board also found that the flight captain, who was evaluating the pilot, failed to adequately monitor and correct her landing.
The pilot, First Officer Robyn S. Sclair, didn't do enough to account for gusty winds and sufficiently slow the plane as it approached the airport. She brought down the Boeing MD-10 slightly to the right of the runway's center line, investigators found.
The faulty landing overtaxed the right main landing gear, causing it to collapse, and the plane caught fire after veering off the runway, investigators said.
Besides the two pilots, five FedEx pilots were riding to Memphis as passengers. All seven escaped through cockpit windows after a passenger inadvertently released an inflatable escape slide from the side of the aircraft.
Two people, including Sclair, were injured.
Sclair was undergoing a company-mandated evaluation from Capt. Richard W. Redditt after deviating from an assigned altitude over England a month earlier. NTSB reports showed she received two unsatisfactory ratings on MD-11 aircraft in 1999 and 2001. Those scores went up after she received more training.
But Sclair's story led the board to recommend creating oversight and training programs for crew members who showed deficiencies or experienced failures in training environments.
"If you took a look at the person as a whole, you may find a pattern that ... this person may have some deficiencies that can be, in fact, improved and be corrected before they get into a situation like we've seen here," said Mark Rosenker, acting NTSB chairman.
Investigators also found crew members hadn't received adequate training on how to handle exit slides. The board recommended providing more hands-on learning and ensuring training equipment matches the slides used on actual planes.
The NTSB is revising the accident report, and Tuesday's recommendations are not final.
"All of the training programs highlighted have been updated since the accident," said FedEx spokeswoman Kristin Krause.
Krause said Redditt has retired and Sclair is on leave from the company.
Capt. Gary Janelli, a representative of the Air Line Pilots Association, said the report should have given more weight to wind conditions and the first officer's lack of recent training on MD-10 planes.
"This accident, like many others, is the result of multiple failures and multiple factors," he said.
The plane was flying from Oakland on the last leg of a four-day trip. Fatigue was ruled out as a factor in the accident, as were weather conditions, though wind shear advisories were in effect that day.
Investigators said it was not clear exactly how the fire started but the flames consumed the right wing and charred the side of the plane.
By HILARY ROXE
The Associated Press
Tuesday, May 17, 2005; 4:39 PM
WASHINGTON -- The pilot of a FedEx cargo jet that caught fire after landing at the Memphis airport in December 2003 was largely responsible for the accident, the National Transportation Safety Board said Tuesday.
The board also found that the flight captain, who was evaluating the pilot, failed to adequately monitor and correct her landing.
The pilot, First Officer Robyn S. Sclair, didn't do enough to account for gusty winds and sufficiently slow the plane as it approached the airport. She brought down the Boeing MD-10 slightly to the right of the runway's center line, investigators found.
The faulty landing overtaxed the right main landing gear, causing it to collapse, and the plane caught fire after veering off the runway, investigators said.
Besides the two pilots, five FedEx pilots were riding to Memphis as passengers. All seven escaped through cockpit windows after a passenger inadvertently released an inflatable escape slide from the side of the aircraft.
Two people, including Sclair, were injured.
Sclair was undergoing a company-mandated evaluation from Capt. Richard W. Redditt after deviating from an assigned altitude over England a month earlier. NTSB reports showed she received two unsatisfactory ratings on MD-11 aircraft in 1999 and 2001. Those scores went up after she received more training.
But Sclair's story led the board to recommend creating oversight and training programs for crew members who showed deficiencies or experienced failures in training environments.
"If you took a look at the person as a whole, you may find a pattern that ... this person may have some deficiencies that can be, in fact, improved and be corrected before they get into a situation like we've seen here," said Mark Rosenker, acting NTSB chairman.
Investigators also found crew members hadn't received adequate training on how to handle exit slides. The board recommended providing more hands-on learning and ensuring training equipment matches the slides used on actual planes.
The NTSB is revising the accident report, and Tuesday's recommendations are not final.
"All of the training programs highlighted have been updated since the accident," said FedEx spokeswoman Kristin Krause.
Krause said Redditt has retired and Sclair is on leave from the company.
Capt. Gary Janelli, a representative of the Air Line Pilots Association, said the report should have given more weight to wind conditions and the first officer's lack of recent training on MD-10 planes.
"This accident, like many others, is the result of multiple failures and multiple factors," he said.
The plane was flying from Oakland on the last leg of a four-day trip. Fatigue was ruled out as a factor in the accident, as were weather conditions, though wind shear advisories were in effect that day.
Investigators said it was not clear exactly how the fire started but the flames consumed the right wing and charred the side of the plane.
10-28-2005, 08:39 AM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Sir James
"...The faulty landing overtaxed the right main landing gear, causing it to collapse, and the plane caught fire...Investigators said it was not clear exactly how the fire started but the flames consumed the right wing and charred the side of the plane."
$100 says she will keep her job...but she'll probably be tired of hearing, "I've got this one". 
Last edited by Captain Monkey Suit; 10-28-2005 at 08:44 AM.
12-27-2006, 06:10 AM
#4
Indian Takeout Driver
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
12-27-2006, 06:23 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,227
The sad thing is, this accident could have started an in-depth debate as to the handling qualities of MD10 vs. MD11, particularly in the flare, particularly in a crosswind, to include the use of (I say over-reliance on) autothrottles and automation.
But due to the pilot involved, the digging stopped as soon as they got to her training record.
But due to the pilot involved, the digging stopped as soon as they got to her training record.
12-27-2006, 06:26 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 202
Crew bus rumor has it that she just got her job back, which is unbelievable because there is alot more to this person than this report states. Just hope she doesn't kill anybody next time.
BTW, this article is dated May of 2005, why post it now?
BTW, this article is dated May of 2005, why post it now?
12-27-2006, 06:29 AM
#7
Indian Takeout Driver
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Originally Posted by Huck
The sad thing is, this accident could have started an in-depth debate as to the handling qualities of MD10 vs. MD11, particularly in the flare, particularly in a crosswind, to include the use of (I say over-reliance on) autothrottles and automation.
But due to the pilot involved, the digging stopped as soon as they got to her training record.
But due to the pilot involved, the digging stopped as soon as they got to her training record.
That said, this is for me, further proof positive that the politics of gender and political correctness has no place in airline hiring practices.. LIVES are at stake.
12-27-2006, 07:38 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Originally Posted by CE750
That is a very valid point.. I have a friend who said this to me recently about how the 10 and the 11 have different characteristics on the landing. There is need to discuss more in depth the difference in the handling of the two aircraft and the wisdom of flying both back and forth.
What is most amazing to me is that the accident board found that neither fatigue nor weather were contributing factors. Have they ever found fatigue as a factor? If not, why not? And if the wind were directly down the runway, this accident probably wouldn't have happened. Please don't misunderstand, I am not coming out in support of this pilot. I would just like to see less political correctness in the NTSB's accident investigation and reporting.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
