![]() |
Its Official; we are doomed
PC FCIF announces BLG reductions and possible furloughs.
https://pilot.fedex.com/news/2008/de..._manning.shtml Pilot Over Manning Road Map FCIF 08-0744 (Admin) One of the primary reasons for the overmanning...AGE 60!:( This is the only pilot induced probem or possible remedy if you will. ALL pilots with 25 YOS and age 60 or over please read: Thank you for your service and for making FedEx what it is today but you are now officially part of the problem, in case you haven't heard. So please do whats right and submit your retirement paperwork. I would also think that pay parity with retirment will be much closer for even those pilots who have not attained 25 YOS in light of the upcoming significant BLG reductions. I'm in favor of and support the concept of BLG reductions to prevent furloughs. I am not however going to support keeping our 25&60's around 1 more day in light of this situation and hope a loud message is sent from every pilot that its time for all of these folks to retire!:( |
ACARS Init, APU Start...$$$$
|
link
Would someone mind cut-and-pasting the news in the link for the rest of us to see.
Thanks. Rott |
not me
Originally Posted by Rottweiler
(Post 528300)
Would someone mind cut-and-pasting the news in the link for the rest of us to see.
Thanks. Rott |
Originally Posted by Rottweiler
(Post 528300)
Would someone mind cut-and-pasting the news in the link for the rest of us to see.
Thanks. Rott Please do not (re)post it here. Discussion is fine. Thanks |
So what does the FCIF say? (readers digest version)
|
Originally Posted by Laughing_Jakal
(Post 528303)
Highly doubtful anyone would as this is a corporate communication
Tomorrow, or any subsequent day in 2009 is too late to take advantage of the "Use it, or lose it" vacation policy, which would be a substantial hit for an elderly, senior type. Starting tomorrow, if the individual chooses to retire shortly, based upon this new information, he has to use or lose all of the vacation accrued in 2008, instead of getting a BIG, FAT lump sum check, in addition to the monthly retirement check that starts up as soon as he hangs it up. That is why you see a lot of retirement dates of December 31 . .at least in the past . . .of guys who would be turning 60 the first few months of the upcoming year. BAD management planning, if the intention was to shake a few codgers loose with whatever this FCIF contained. If it had been put out around the 1st of the month, it might have motivated a few (peer pressure even) to submit their paperwork. Happy New Year . . and Good Luck!:( |
Funny,
I thought the same thing. Maybe they think the old-timers will retire anyway, and they can avoid boosting one of their high fives this way...... Bean Counters.....gotta love 'em |
At least all of the over 60 guys will still be around to give us advice on how they survived the Great Depression when they were kids.
|
Originally Posted by 1st overnite
(Post 528328)
At least all of the over 60 guys will still be around to give us advice on how they survived the Great Depression when they were kids.
|
On a trip and getting ready to head down to the lobby. Trying to collect my thoughts and look at the big picture here. Removing the rose-colored glasses. It's quite possible I will be facing my third furlough in my undistinguished airline career should Fedex even use the scalpel approach to reduce manning. Gotta tell you it's going to make my ice-cold adult beverage go down awfully tough when I get home this evening.
But then I think of the guys at Airborne Express, TWA, Midwest, ATA et al(not El Al) and I take a different perspective on what's happening. Nobody's dying here. My kids are still heathy and all my siblings seem to have their mental and physical health(but then there is this brother of mine who talks to his golf balls that I've always wondered about). I get just as ****ed as the next guy at those over 60 with 25 years of time with the company that got back or remain in the front seat. I want to shout at them and ask them why they would allow this to happen to a guy with a young family when they could just retire and go away. Chaps my a$$! But again, they have their personal agenda and I refuse to live my life in anger and hostility when it benefits no one. What's my point you ask as you scratch your head and wonder if I'm using this as cheap therapy(yes, because I can't afford real therapy). I have faith that JG and his crew will do everything they can to see that our COLLECTIVE interests are looked after. While I do that, I'll thank God that I'm not in Iraq or Afghanistan getting shot at(that REALLY sucked) and that another 9-11 hasn't happened yet. Trust me folks, something akin to 9-11 happens again and we are ALL in a hurt locker professionally. If you can, through your rage and anxiety, tell your spouse and kids you love them, call your family members you can't see and be thankful for the health and life that you still have. A lot of folks are doing the dirt dance now that always expected to wake up tomorrow and see 2009. And TRY to be civil to ALL your brethren Fedex pilots...your angst hurts nobody but you. Take care y'all and hang on for the ride! |
Well, there goes my theory...
Here's to all operating tonight...fly safe. And to our over 60 crowd, now's the time to do the right thing. Alright FDX ALPA, deeds not words...go get 'em!! Protect/enforce our agreement!! |
You know what torques me off the most about the FCIF?
How we simply can't go on with the 'over-manned state'...of course, making OVER A BILLION, it must hurt! Somebody wake up the advertising department at UPS We've saved the company 2 million a month in gas, they have to pay 1 million to buy up our lines...boo-hoo! We're no longer in this together, management has thrown us under the bus. |
Yeah, Fred took his "20% pay cut" and is now going to exact his revenge on those of us in the "evil association" (union for the rest of us).
|
Hamfist,
I hear you, and you've obviously got some serious industry perspective and some massive compartmentalization skills. I don't wake up blaming the world for my lot in life either, I'm very blessed. I might, however, need to pray for forgiveness for the sins I may commit against the next "Bro" I meet who's flying a draft trip. Happy New Year, fly safe, and thank you to all my Alpa Reps who are doing the right thing, working hard to communicate this New Year's Eve so that we rank and file have some perspective. I appreciated all the Union communication and perspective so that the FCIF wasn't all I heard this evening, and that didn't happen without some effort. SD |
If we're currently overmanned by 700 pilots (without MBPG reduction to min). What are the adjusted figures with the MBPG reduction. I'll ask my rep. But, I think that should have been included in the FCIF.
|
Originally Posted by skypig
(Post 528384)
If we're currently overmanned by 700 pilots (without MBPG reduction to min). What are the adjusted figures with the MBPG reduction. I'll ask my rep. But, I think that should have been included in the FCIF.
|
Originally Posted by MalteseX
(Post 528388)
With the MBPG reduction that was "supposed" by the company (as per the neg. comm. chairman's message) of 58 CH for 4 week, etc., (ie not using the 48/60 mins as "unrealistic" for now) and using ALL the members on the seniority list (4679), the amount of man-hours saved per year would leave a surplus of 14 pilots with the reductions. ( ie reduction to 58 CH MBPG; not accounting for sick, mil, more downturn, more "upturn", everyone flying equivalent hours, no hurricanes, ice storms, etc etc)
|
And I do know that you do not end a sentence with from, bt that is how I talk. Sorry in advance.
|
Everybody needs to read this trash from our investor relations folks and then piece together what they (management) is doing to our employee relations, i.e., chopping all of our pay, taking away 401k match for the vast majority of employees, threatening furloughs (something that was always taboo).
Our company is penny wise and pound foolish and truly going down a downhill path. Mission, Strategy, Values | About FedEx |
Originally Posted by MalteseX
(Post 528388)
With the MBPG reduction that was "supposed" by the company (as per the neg. comm. chairman's message) of 58 CH for 4 week, etc., (ie not using the 48/60 mins as "unrealistic" for now) and using ALL the members on the seniority list (4679), the amount of man-hours saved per year would leave a surplus of 14 pilots with the reductions. ( ie reduction to 58 CH MBPG; not accounting for sick, mil, more downturn, more "upturn", everyone flying equivalent hours, no hurricanes, ice storms, etc etc)
I'm with ya, thanks. |
What?
Ok, so let me understand this. If we furlough 700 pilots, what will be the cost to replace the 125 ACN FO's affected, the 20+ HKN FO's affected, and the 64 MEM MD11 FO's affected. Not to mention the ANC and HKG move packages. I must not have the big picture. Can you help me?
|
What was the old brain bag sticker? "Fly till you die?" We need a new one for our "buddies" - "Fly till we furlough."
Overheard an over 60 guy looking to roll into the 727 back seat at 65 (on a 0130 hub turn). What is the cost savings/pilot of guys croaking in their hotel room and never picking up a retirement check? Or will the company deposit his survivor benefit into the National Bank of Campenas for disbursal? |
Still nothing from the union about carry over bidding (guys protecting it and flying 120 hour lines...). Protecting the senior guys is what this comes down to. If this was stopped now at least half of the problem would be taken care of.
|
Overmanning issue
The issue here is truly an emotional one that affects every pilot at FedEx and probably many other airlines as well. I'll limit my comments to FedEx issues exclusively though.
In better economic times, we left ourselves open for more "interpretation" by the company regarding downsizing. Put the blame on the economy that was carrying us on the crest of the wave or on our overwhelming attempts to benefit the senior pilot group by focusing on retirement issues that the majority of the membership did not rate high on the list of things to be worked. Put the blame on ourselves for voting for DW. When polled, the membership did not support the over 60 issue. Yet DW saw that the uninformed pilot group had made a critical mistake and he corrected our error. When you look at the numbers that Capt Cassel put out regarding the anticipated retirements, you can clearly see that the "traditional" retirement rate (before the old fogey law was passed...) could have relieved us of nearly 1/3 of the stated overage simply by not hiring. But DW saw the error of our ways and correct it for us. When you look at the over/under issue, there is a manning issue that raises it's head there also. Wouldn't be a factor if the old fogey law had not passed. But DW saw the error of our ways and voted to support ALPA's efforts to get the law passed. So when you're sitting in your seat and the old guy stows his walker, just remember that he's made the decision to get his and the heck with the rest of us. Just like those that chose to fly a few years back and purchase red Corvettes as the rest of us toed the line. How can the old fogeys complain about those red Corvettes now???????? |
Originally Posted by FR8Hauler
(Post 528416)
Still nothing from the union about carry over bidding (guys protecting it and flying 120 hour lines...). Protecting the senior guys is what this comes down to. If this was stopped now at least half of the problem would be taken care of.
As the C/O thing is just another thing to keep us mad at each other instead of at the company for pitting us against each other. |
Originally Posted by LightAttack
(Post 528406)
What was the old brain bag sticker? "Fly till you die?" We need a new one for our "buddies" - "Fly till we furlough."
Overheard an over 60 guy looking to roll into the 727 back seat at 65 (on a 0130 hub turn). What is the cost savings/pilot of guys croaking in their hotel room and never picking up a retirement check? Or will the company deposit his survivor benefit into the National Bank of Campenas for disbursal? Not sure where the following (from the CBA) was lost in the translation wrt to our current crop of "experienced" pilotos who are now being treated fairly is concerned. I always wondered how guys were allowed to go to the back of the 10 and 727 when there were no vacancies (ie. it was properly staffed). In any event, the altruism should be nearing the end of it's useful life by now. 23.A.2. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 23.A.1. and B.1., the following apply to a pilot subject to a regulated age restriction: 23.A.2c. A restricted pilot who cannot move to or be accommodated as a second of ficer from another crew position because his relative seniority is less than the current population of second officers or there are no second officer crew seats, shall be offered the opportunity to retire as provided in the Agreement. Following a pilot’s rejection of the offer, the pilot shall be released from employment as provided in Section 22.B.1., and shall not be considered as having been furloughed in cases where the only crew status the pilot can occupy is second of ficer. |
Originally Posted by A300_Driver
(Post 528422)
As the C/O thing is just another thing to keep us mad at each other instead of at the company for pitting us against each other.
The union wants to work an agreement to limit this stuff but the company says no. There is no reason to be mad at each other about this. The company has their fangs out and they want blood.... |
Gunter-
You missed the jist of my post (or maybe I failed to convey it well), as I completely agree with you... |
Originally Posted by A300_Driver
(Post 528431)
Gunter-
You missed the jist of my post (or maybe I failed to convey it well), as I completely agree with you... The problem is there is no "fair and equitable C/O." Only the senior guys can work that system. So they will gobble them up and still have 100 hr + lines and the rest of us working stiffs will slugg it out on the 48 hr lines. Do away with it all or this is a no go in my book. As long as there are lines out there with more that a couple days of carry over it is a show stopper. There are some pairings that always require some carry over but it is ridiculous right now. I have 7 days of carryover they gave me on a VTO in Jan, and PC wants to cut us in Feb? Not even close to "fair and equitable" the way the bid pack is written right now. |
Originally Posted by FR8Hauler
(Post 528438)
A300,
The problem is there is no "fair and equitable C/O." Only the senior guys can work that system. So they will gobble them up and still have 100 hr + lines and the rest of us working stiffs will slugg it out on the 48 hr lines. Do away with it all or this is a no go in my book. As long as there are lines out there with more that a couple days of carry over it is a show stopper. There are some pairings that always require some carry over but it is ridiculous right now. I have 7 days of carryover they gave me on a VTO in Jan, and PC wants to cut us in Feb? Not even close to "fair and equitable" the way the bid pack is written right now. I certainly don't know that to be the exact case, but in my mind, that would be moving towards fair and equitable, especially given the state of our company stated "over-manning". Once again, the company doesn't really want that to happen! They'd rather have us taking it out on the guys that are protecting the c/o at the expense of the entire crewforce. Because their desire is to keep us fractured! |
It'll be gone soon. I think that it has already been posted at least once.
|
Sounds to me you guys work for a company that is actually being managed. Those evil executives are actually trying to do something to keep the company solvent so that there can be jobs and services long into the future.
|
Many of us on this board, while very junior at Purple, have been through this before. The key is not to panic and stay unified.
Save, don't spend. Choose safe investments. If you're in the guard/reserves, stay. Consider taking a year to go on orders and go to school or do a flying or staff tour. If you're not currently serving, consider joining back up. If you're a civilian only guy, develop a buisness. There are contract protections in place to keep the guys on the property on the property. We have to hold the company's feet to the fire to the letter on these protections. The company will try to exploit our fear and try to divide us. That's their job; our job is not to be divided. It's my belief that FedEx will not furlough. Guys in ANC, guys in HKG, paid moves, training cycles, I just don't see it. But they will make you think they will and take full advantages of your fear. The guys I worry about are the guys like the 727 CA I flew with a few months ago: big house, big car collection, two airplanes and a nose in VIPS open time every time he was near a computer. If you're flying your month plus two trips and barely making it as a narrow body CA, you need to slow your roll. Read the contract, know the contract, enforce the contract. |
Originally Posted by milky
(Post 528492)
Sounds to me you guys work for a company that is actually being managed. Those evil executives are actually trying to do something to keep the company solvent so that there can be jobs and services long into the future.
|
It's my belief that FedEx will not furlough. Guys in ANC, guys in HKG, paid moves, training cycles, I just don't see it. But they will make you think they will 1. Orders came down from on high to cut pilot pay; 2. They looked at the contract. Only way they could lower pilot pay is when they are preventing a furlough. 3. They use the required language so they can abide by the contract. They can't say, "We're cutting pilot salaries." They can say, "We're cutting pilot salaries to prevent a furlough." |
MOD NOTE:
Please do not post the FCIF as it is against APC policy and just an issue we do not want to get into. It company related priviliged information and when posted here is reported by fellow FDX pilots many times over to us. |
Originally Posted by A300_Driver
(Post 528368)
Yeah, Fred took his "20% pay cut" and is now going to exact his revenge on those of us in the "evil association" (union for the rest of us).
By the way. Remember its not just us taking a hit. The rest of OUR company is taking a hit too! |
Welcome to the forum.
We've already taken a hit. At least the earnings total on my W2 is going to be less than last years, even after a longevity raise and the contractual raise. I am in it for the long haul too. But that doesn't mean accepting everything without a grain of salt, nor does it mean bending over to take it just because I should be grateful to have a job 100s of other pilots don't. nor does it mean taking an additional huge salary cut simply to maintain the profitibility margin so the stock doesn't take a hit. When are the shareholders of OUR company going to take a hit? Afterall, it's apparently about the economic survival of FedEx in some individuals eyes. And, aren't we all in this together |
Originally Posted by FR8Hauler
(Post 528416)
Still nothing from the union about carry over bidding (guys protecting it and flying 120 hour lines...). Protecting the senior guys is what this comes down to. If this was stopped now at least half of the problem would be taken care of.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:30 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands