![]() |
Originally Posted by CAVU
(Post 532369)
A current member of the MEC gets selected to be on the initial cadre of the 777. Cheers Pablo, we won!
|
This pretty much sums up why we will continue to "talk the talk" but not "walk the walk" ..................... Anyone know how to do a "Right Oblique" or are we better off at "Parade Rest" ???
|
Nice post Pablo.
|
Originally Posted by Jumbo Pilot
(Post 532354)
Do any of you really think that if we had the umm.. "GUTS" to not bid the airplane that the company would let THAT bid go through? With the Bottom 250 flying that airplane?... Really?
No .. if we had the "GUTS".. that bid would have been cancelled.. and we would have gotten a lot further in this negotiation for the proper payrate for the 777. JP Maybe that new hire from Emirates or Cathay might be qualified? Again, there are two issues at play that makes things seem bad. Don't confuse the two.... |
Originally Posted by vagabond
(Post 532384)
No, I was threw spanking him! ;)
btw, PastV1, I've been using "livid" every chance I get. |
Originally Posted by hoya saxa
(Post 532366)
"Could" you possibly "use" more "quotes???":D
|
Originally Posted by PastV1
(Post 532468)
So, the bottom 250 guys would be incapable of flying the 777 around the world?
Maybe that new hire from Emirates or Cathay might be qualified? Again, there are two issues at play that makes things seem bad. Don't confuse the two.... No doubt, more than capable, but how could they threaten a furlough. |
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
(Post 532499)
No doubt more than capable, but than how could they threaten a furlough.
Would you go to the right seat of the 727 or to the right seat of the 777 if you were excessed? |
Originally Posted by PastV1
(Post 532468)
So, the bottom 250 guys would be incapable of flying the 777 around the world? How junior is that bottom 300 Capt in HKG?
Maybe that new hire from Emirates or Cathay might be qualified? Again, there are two issues at play that makes things seem bad. Don't confuse the two.... Time to get off PB back, he is one of the good guys. |
Originally Posted by hamfisted
(Post 532278)
Valid point Boss.
Am I making sense or out in left field though? Union Rep bids 777 while Union justifiably claims company is not negotiating in good faith. Union insinuates that bidding 777 without pay rate finalized is subversive to rest of crew force's best interest. Union rep then tries to justify by saying he was being "honorable and principled" by sticking to his agreement to instruct on 777. What happened to his agreement to represent the best interests of his Union constituents? If he wasn't a Union rep; I wouldn't have noticed or cared what he did. Like you said, there was going to be 250 guys who bid it anyway. But then again I got kicked off the debate team for choking out my competition so I can be a little ummmm emotional. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands