Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Yeah I Fly a Turboprop.  What's it to Ya? >

Yeah I Fly a Turboprop. What's it to Ya?

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Yeah I Fly a Turboprop. What's it to Ya?

Old 04-22-2006, 11:24 AM
  #1  
BlueSun
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry Yeah I Fly a Turboprop. What's it to Ya?

I fly a turboprop for a living. Well, to be honest it's not much of a living. I love my job, and the flying is great, but you can't make a career out of it, and I don't really plan on it.

Back in the old days, flying a turboprop meant something; it was respectable work, a means to an end, and some of the old-timers I encounter while jumpseating recall fond memories of doing the job I do. These guys cut their teeth on airplanes like mine, and then moved up to join the ranks of the majors and legacy carriers. Many have told me that the best years of their careers were spent flying low and slow.

Then came the RJ, and "regional airline" became more of a relative term. Much of the domestic flying has been consumed by these carriers, and now rookies like me can go right from the piston twin and into a jet. Those guys are missing out, in my opinion, but I guess--in the States anyway--the turboprop is a dying breed.

This is a vicious industry, and real security is becoming scarce. Even my little airline has been on the brink in the short time I've been with them, and we just feed off the scraps. Most of my peers have jumped ship for higher-paying and more glamorous jobs in the right seats of CRJs, ERJs, and 170s.

Me, I want a command. Whether or not PIC time is valuable to anyone anymore I can't really say. All I know is that I'll never really learn about the sky if it's not my ass on the line. But it's still turboprop time.

Now everybody wants jet time. The heavier the better. All glass? Even better. Totally automated? Perfect. Where's the respect for the turboprops? Where's the respect for old-fashioned stick-and-rudder skills? Where's the respect for a hard-earned and intimate knowledge of weather, winds, turbulence and structural icing so thick you have to chop it off?

I know several green FOs who bailed out of my airline for automated RJs because they couldn't hack hand-flying a beast like mine. Someday soon they'll meet the minimums of the JetBlues and the Continentals. Is that really who they want to hire? Maybe so.

I just finished reading the entertaining but ultimately sad thread started by Snoopy747, which mentioned retired Space Shuttle commanders that can't find decent jobs in this industry. I wish all those guys the best of luck, but I'd be lying if I said it didn't bring me down a bit.

I know it's a tough business; in a way it's almost a source of pride for me. So is the flying I do. Maybe that's why I've stuck it out so far. But I wouldn't mind flying a widebody freighter across the Pacific some day. I just hope I'm not shooting myself in the foot by staying here. Maybe my buddies are right and I should just go over to Wisky or Republic and get in line behind everyone else.

I don't know, what do you guys think?
 
Old 04-22-2006, 11:32 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: A320
Posts: 406
Default

If you really want to do PACRim ops on a heavy I recomend you get some glass time. Yo will need it to get hired with any of the decent/semidecent companies that do that kind of job. Very few clasic aircraft will be aroubd in 5 years.
greedyairlineexec is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 12:36 PM
  #3  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Most wide body pilots are old enough to have a wide range of experience. Nobody would put down the turbo props, but having flown various types from light piston, fighter, turboprop, various transport category jets and many more you will find the experience has a cumulative effect. Is one better than another? That's up to you, but you know where the money is and if you want a career you know what you need.
There are many good people out there with skills far better than my own who don't have a job. It may be that job hunting, human interaction and luck are just as important as raw flying skill. One without the others is not going to get you the seat you want.
jungle is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 01:21 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
viktorbravo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Capt: Lav Truck
Posts: 288
Default

The 1000 hr PIC turbine time that many airlines require means just that, turbine. Doesnt matter if the turbine has paddles sticking out of it or not. As far as your other comments about stick and rudder skills needed to fly some of the hotter turboprops, I agree. I have just shy of 7000 hrs in a Brasilia (thats nothing to be proud of Rusty<G>) and I can say that if I climbed into one of those today and had a 600 RVR V1 cut I would probably roll it over and splatter myself! In comparison the toughest part about flying the heavy iron across the pacific is going through the reams of paperwork required to get the jet started, bringing along enough reading material, and then once at your destination, trying to find your ride to the hotel. As far a glass goes, its way easier following the magenta line and programming the FMC than flying the old steam powered stuff, non issue IMO, but others may disagree.

If I were still in the hiring game I would feel that turboprop command time is more valuble than sitting in the right seat of an RJ. When I hired on at the "workers paradise" they told me that they heavily counted a persons turbine command time with a crew of more than one pilot. I guess the requirements may be different these days, but you still need the command time. If you can get that faster somewhere else and rack up some jet time I would say go for it. No need to get all sentimental about flying turboprops 8 legs a day in and out of that same line of level 5 thunderstorms. Its all about how quick you can get to the job you ultimately want. of course YMMV.

Last edited by viktorbravo; 04-22-2006 at 01:36 PM.
viktorbravo is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 01:49 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KiloAlpha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: AA A320
Posts: 1,624
Default

Being a TP pilot myself.....

******* YO JET BIATCH!


j/k of course
KiloAlpha is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 04:47 PM
  #6  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default My 2 Cents

True pilots skills are becoming unnecessary in the automated glass cockpit world. All you need is to be able to pass the interview ride. The sad part is that if you actually take the time to aquire real skills you will be bored and dissatisfied being a button monkey. If your goal is to fly the heavy metal I would find the shortest path available and forget about any hero pilot fantasies.

SkyHigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 04-23-2006, 03:52 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
747classic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 742 Capt.
Posts: 31
Default

Blades don't matter.
You can fly an ATR -500, with automation, glass and everything, or you can fly a classic 72-3-4-7 with nothing but needles and gyros.

But, study has shown, that when moving to glass cockpit, pilots who have a background flying 'round dials' and classic steam-gauges, have a better situational awareness than pilots who were born with a sidestick in their hand.

For me, I like flying the old diesel, even if later it will be harder for me to get another job.
747classic is offline  
Old 04-23-2006, 08:26 AM
  #8  
BlueSun
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey thanks for all the input, guys/gals, and for listening to my rant. It's always nice to get advice from people who've been through it. I'd kill to fly that 742 around, but for now I guess I need to be patient and hold what I've got. Besides, it sure beats working for a living.

Cheers
 
Old 04-23-2006, 11:19 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain_drew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: FredEx Captain-Retired
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSun
Hey thanks for all the input, guys/gals, and for listening to my rant. It's always nice to get advice from people who've been through it. I'd kill to fly that 742 around, but for now I guess I need to be patient and hold what I've got. Besides, it sure beats working for a living.

Cheers
Hey . .one of my all-time FAVORITE airplanes to fly was a dreaded turbo-prop. No ‘boosted’ controls. . you move the stick .it was all pulleys and wires to the ACTUAL control surface. AND . . all hand flying too . .no auto-pilot.

And the pay was crap too, since I was only a LT on 1968 Flight Pay. At least it was more than what the Blackshoes were making. .

BTW. . it was the OV-10 . . and WHAT a hoot it was to fly!

Look at whatever you are doing now as a “stepping stone” to your future. I had NO idea things would turn out so great back then. Just made the best of it.
captain_drew is offline  
Old 04-23-2006, 01:30 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dash trash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
My 2 cents
SkyHigh
two cents is about what its worth...
dash trash is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DHol14
Major
5
07-24-2006 06:32 AM
Kalaika
Major
6
06-26-2006 08:24 AM
saviboy
Regional
19
03-10-2006 02:54 PM
cloudkicker1981
Cargo
11
01-14-2006 07:56 AM
Gordon C
Regional
1
10-15-2005 03:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices