Does Carry over reduce RSV line value?
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Is this a trick question, like what is black and white and used to be read all over?
So when does C/O not help the company by flying extra time at straight pay, helping them to claim we have to many pilots, and allowing them to take trips out of the next months bid pack?
#14
Take your blinders off and RTFQ before you bring up all the other issues with C/O. Never said a word about it other than the definition of RLG.
If they took those hours and put them into a line it would be calculated as BLG. So I guess it's not C/O anymore then is it? So, just so you understand, C/O has nothing to do with BLG or RLG calculations.
P.S. GUnter even clarified his question and I agreed with him...
Last edited by PastV1; 01-10-2009 at 06:25 AM.
#15
Sorry about the confusing thread title.
My contention is CO has a very real effect on line averages when you look at more than one month at a time.
After CO is reduce in the first month subsequent months see a positive effect.
My contention is CO has a very real effect on line averages when you look at more than one month at a time.
After CO is reduce in the first month subsequent months see a positive effect.
#16

Kinda like the shoot first, aim later type of thinking.
#17
Gunter, it's kind of hard to tell. If the company used the c/o to bulk up line values, then it would affect RLG, but if they used the c/o to build more lines with similar BLG's, or to fill VTO's, then it would not affect RLG.
#18
Excessive carryover also steals hrs away from the next month.
With 4a2b in effect, the company sees a benefit from actually increasing carryover.
They will also abuse the allowable 13 spread. The spread could be held much tighter.
Single departures need to be smaller or the spread needs to be tighter. Just put that in the same category as no early retirment packages or monthly caps on credit hrs.
With 4a2b in effect, the company sees a benefit from actually increasing carryover.
They will also abuse the allowable 13 spread. The spread could be held much tighter.
Single departures need to be smaller or the spread needs to be tighter. Just put that in the same category as no early retirment packages or monthly caps on credit hrs.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
It's a simple question. The title of Gunter's thread was "Does C/O reduce RSV line value" The straight forward and factual answer is what I posted in the context that I took his question. RLG is 96% of BLG. C/O has no value in RLG or BLG.
Take your blinders off and RTFQ before you bring up all the other issues with C/O. Never said a word about it other than the definition of RLG.
If they took those hours and put them into a line it would be calculated as BLG. So I guess it's not C/O anymore then is it? So, just so you understand, C/O has nothing to do with BLG or RLG calculations.
P.S. GUnter even clarified his question and I agreed with him...
Take your blinders off and RTFQ before you bring up all the other issues with C/O. Never said a word about it other than the definition of RLG.
If they took those hours and put them into a line it would be calculated as BLG. So I guess it's not C/O anymore then is it? So, just so you understand, C/O has nothing to do with BLG or RLG calculations.
P.S. GUnter even clarified his question and I agreed with him...
But my comments only concerned your statement "C/O has no impact on RLG or BLG". You really think it doesn't O wise one?
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



