Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

WSJ UPS article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2009, 12:40 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default WSJ UPS article

I'm curious what kind of benchmarks will be used to describe the report as better or worst than expected?

Shopping malls here in Singapore are still pretty full so who knows, maybe this recession won't bring the end of the world after all?




Volumes Key to UPS Report

By ALEX ROTH

Virtually every company in the freight-transportation and parcel-delivery industries, from railroads to truckers to ocean shippers, has seen volumes plummet amid the recession. On Tuesday, United Parcel Service Inc. is likely to report that its fourth-quarter volumes were no exception.
The question is how much these volume drops will hurt the Atlanta company's profit and its forecast for 2009. "I don't think you're going to see anything pretty come out of UPS," said Satish Jindel of SJ Consulting Group, a consultant to the parcel-delivery industry. He noted that the economy turned particularly grim in December in a variety of categories, including less-than-truckload freight and international air cargo.

Two months ago, UPS's chief competitor, FedEx Corp., coping with the slumping volumes, slashed pay for 35,000 employees, including its chairman and chief executive, Frederick W. Smith, who took a 20% cut in base pay. Mr. Smith at the time cited "some of the worst economic conditions in the company's 35-year operating history."
Since then, economic conditions haven't improved -- and may have gotten even worse. In December, year-over-year volumes for some trucking and railroad companies declined by double-digit percentages.

But UPS could get a boost from declining fuel prices. When fuel prices drop quickly, many transportation companies receive a windfall because of a time lag between the prices they pay for fuel and the surcharges they pass along to customers. Given the drop, UPS's earnings report on Tuesday "probably won't be that unsettling," said Avondale Partners analyst Donald Broughton.

Both UPS and FedEx stand to benefit from DHL's exit from the U.S. domestic delivery market. DHL's parent company, Deutsche Post AG, announced those plans in November, citing losses in the U.S. of more than $2 billion in the past two years. Even with DHL's exit, however, UPS still faces significant headwinds. During the Christmas season, business was so bad for both UPS and FedEx that both companies canceled their annual predictions of how many packages they would handle in the peak shipping days before Christmas.
Write to Alex Roth at [email protected]

Last edited by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE; 02-02-2009 at 12:48 AM.
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 03:35 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE View Post
I'm curious what kind of benchmarks will be used to describe the report as better or worst than expected?
I've always marveled at the answer to your question. The benchmark that will undoubtedly be used is "Wall Streets' Expectations." So in effect, if Wall Street's brokerage houses feel that a company has met their expectations of profits (or loses), then a favorable report will be forthcoming. If not, then an unfavorable report, based on "XXX company's earnings didn't meet Wall Streets expectations." The beauty, from "the streets" report is that buyers and sellers will heed that report and the brokerage houses will make their profits on both as some people dump a stock, while others buy it. You just gotta love it.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:35 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VegasBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: MD-11 F/O UPS
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
I've always marveled at the answer to your question. The benchmark that will undoubtedly be used is "Wall Streets' Expectations." So in effect, if Wall Street's brokerage houses feel that a company has met their expectations of profits (or loses), then a favorable report will be forthcoming. If not, then an unfavorable report, based on "XXX company's earnings didn't meet Wall Streets expectations." The beauty, from "the streets" report is that buyers and sellers will heed that report and the brokerage houses will make their profits on both as some people dump a stock, while others buy it. You just gotta love it.

JJ

I have no idea what this thread is about; I just keep staring at your Avatar.
VegasBoy is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 05:22 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Check 6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 777
Posts: 866
Default

JJ,

God bless America! I love this country.....
Check 6 is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 10:24 AM
  #5  
Thanks for the jumpseat!
 
dudewannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: MD-11 galley operator
Posts: 260
Default

Originally Posted by VegasBoy View Post
I have no idea what this thread is about; I just keep staring at your Avatar.
How patriotic of you.
dudewannabe is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 12:49 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cma2407's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Row well and live...
Posts: 494
Default

Originally Posted by VegasBoy View Post
I have no idea what this thread is about; I just keep staring at your Avatar.
Now that's an improvement compared to a photo of a license plate...
cma2407 is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 01:17 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

That's what I've thought all along. Most of you guys are on this site only for the pictures. Must be a very large percentage of fighter pilots.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM
FlyAstarJets
Cargo
38
09-27-2008 10:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices