Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Cargo Kings Fly High

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2006, 08:12 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
FX Bone Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 122
Default Cargo Kings Fly High

If you haven't seen this June 13, 2006 article from TheStreet.com, it's worth looking at if you're still trying to figure out the difference between the cargo and pax airlines.

The Link:
http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/st.../10291189.html

The first line:
Fuel costs and labor disputes have led to tremendous distress at passenger airlines in recent years, but the cargo carriers never seem to complain.
FX Bone Guy is offline  
Old 06-15-2006, 02:41 PM
  #2  
Gets all holidays off
 
fr8rcaptain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: Retired UPS 767 Captain, SDF Z
Posts: 431
Default Good Read

This article is actually a good representation of the macro issues and UPS/IPA contract negotiations.

Another day of retro pay....
fr8rcaptain is offline  
Old 06-15-2006, 02:54 PM
  #3  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

One thing the author didn't mention in the comparison of pax vs. cargo is what I call revenue density. A passenger airliner can carry the same weight as cargo aircraft but the revenue to weight ratio doesn't compare.

A 185 lbs human expects to pay, say $300, for a ROUND TRIP plane ride from city A-B. A cargo carrier, like Fed Ex, UPS, or DHL, on the other hand can get a floor to ceiling stack of overnight letters in the same footprint at about $20 per letter - and that's a one-way trip!

Because the cargo aircraft has more "revenue units" in the cargo holds, it has a much better ability to apply a fuel surcharge as the costs are distributed over more "revenue units".

Revenue and profits are much easier to produce by cargo carriers with energy costs going through the roof - now if you get just get them to the negotiating table. Is it any wonder that UPS and Fed Ex are dragging their feet to the table?

Another day of retro pay indeed!
HSLD is offline  
Old 06-16-2006, 11:35 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD11HOG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD11 F/O
Posts: 653
Default Duopoly

When you only have one or two competitors, the odds of someone starting a price war also diminishes. And for someone to set up a nationwide package delivery service would take a huge capital outlay. We, dont have to worry about some rich guy buying a couple of airplanes and cherry picking our best routes. It's much easier for our managment to look good because as long as you don't poke the other guy with a nuke, there's not to much to srew up competition wise.
MD11HOG is offline  
Old 06-16-2006, 10:00 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Priority 3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Unknown
Posts: 211
Default

That's a good analysis HSLD!
Priority 3 is offline  
Old 06-17-2006, 11:45 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

HSLD,

Don't forget, that's a full widebody doing something like STL-MEM/SDF in some cases too.

I think there are a lot of other little things that add up too. Buying "old" planes dirt cheap, not putting many cycles on it relative to a pax airline which extends the life, and the list could go on forever...

Oh, and the fact that people don't give a crap about the fuel surcharge because that contract absolutely has to be there tomorrow!
Pilotpip is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freighter Captain
Major
24
02-03-2008 08:59 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
1
05-21-2006 09:27 AM
Priority 3
Cargo
0
05-15-2006 01:49 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
09-14-2005 10:35 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices