hey ups bubbas
02-09-2010, 12:21 AM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
hey ups bubbas
how much savings via the mou does ups get if the faa changes the rest rules in april and the new rules requires everybody to come back off rdg and loa?
better get some new savings in place in time " we suggest that other possibilities should involve a willingness to explore solutions that could involve contractual terms."
after all, ups shouldn't be left to shoulder the new rest rules and regulations all by themselves after they've been so gracious to ipa this past year.
better get the new savings in place quick before the furlough monster comes. booga booga
better get some new savings in place in time " we suggest that other possibilities should involve a willingness to explore solutions that could involve contractual terms."
after all, ups shouldn't be left to shoulder the new rest rules and regulations all by themselves after they've been so gracious to ipa this past year.
better get the new savings in place quick before the furlough monster comes. booga booga
02-09-2010, 12:30 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Brown 747-400
Posts: 524
Weatherman,
I think I speak for all UPS line pilots when I say: GFY.
I think I speak for all UPS line pilots when I say: GFY.
02-09-2010, 12:39 AM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
weatherman,
We all enjoy a good flamebait post, but thats all you can muster??? Better flamebait comes out of a crackerjack box.
Please practice on the other websites and come back when you have some experience.
We all enjoy a good flamebait post, but thats all you can muster??? Better flamebait comes out of a crackerjack box.
Please practice on the other websites and come back when you have some experience.
02-09-2010, 12:42 AM
#4
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
very good now you're thinking.
can you think of any other possible reason for the big brown monster to throw away a $100+ million deal on paper, other than that those savings would never materialize because of the new regulations?
hmm? but maybe there are other ways to get the savings if the big brown monster can make it scary enough.
can you think of any other possible reason for the big brown monster to throw away a $100+ million deal on paper, other than that those savings would never materialize because of the new regulations?
hmm? but maybe there are other ways to get the savings if the big brown monster can make it scary enough.
02-09-2010, 03:03 AM
#5
Tri-tanic operator
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Originally Posted by weatherman
after all, ups shouldn't be left to shoulder the new rest rules and regulations all by themselves after they've been so gracious to ipa this past year.
02-09-2010, 03:47 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
You know, back in 1989, when I was hired at UPS, there were two guys in my new hire class that we found out a week or two later, were hired as flight managers. Both were rather "strange", unsociable, and non-friendly folks. After all these years, you'd think that UPS would have found out that these types of guys are really a throwback to an earlier, more contentious time, but I guess not. Weatherman, you sir fit the mold perfectly, and although I no longer work for Brown, can tell that you fit right in as just another misfit.
JJ
JJ
02-09-2010, 04:26 AM
#7
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: A300 Cpt
Posts: 65
I think Weatherman was being sarcastic, not baiting. I agree. The MOU was not the permanent savings that they seem to want.
02-09-2010, 08:52 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,948
Multiple TOS violations. Thread closed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
