I think you added the "probably" on your edit, but I cant prove it. My bad.

 

That's not what I edited. To be fair, I can't prove it either. I had attributed some items to Fred Buesser, but since he is not in a position to defend himself I figured it wasn't right. I also decided to take out some things had to do with an offline conversation with WR our former Treasurer. I couldn't remember the exact conversation and didn't want to attribute anything to him that was not accurate.

You can believe me or not.....Sounds like lately all you are doing is picking fights with people LAG. Is it really easier to believe that I edited the "Probably" rather than the fact you might have overlooked one word on an overly wordy ego driven diatribe on my part?

 

Well I don't want to pick a fight but I read it 3 times. I was carefull because it was a definitive statement and sounded like it was part of another conversation with members of the MEC. It sounded like you knew what you were talking about.

Perception and truth are different things. I reviewed my posts and cant find where I picked a fight. I did see where foxhunter attacks my post, attacks me, backs up my post, responds to my post, denies responding to my post and denies senility all in 5 straight posts.

Would love to see an example of where I picked a fight if you can point to one.

But you have made this conversation about me instead of about whether it is a good idea to negotiate a LOA when the contract is approaching the amendable date.

 

Actually LAG the conversation I entered was about MEC officers retaining pay during 4a2B. I have my opinion about what should be going on. I'll share it with my block rep. You should do the same.

 

Brother, you either trust me and take my word for it and we can have a productive conversation......or call me a liar. If you imply that I edited my post to win a petty argument, I call that picking a fight. Let's keep the conversation here about important things and not go off on tangents.....

I'm done.

 

[quote=FDXLAG;836773] I was carefull ...


lurn two spel oar goe too privut messuges

 

Glad u r done, I didnt imply anything. I said I think you added probably during your edit. We obviously have 2 different memories of the event. When I 1st read your post there was no probably, you remember it differently, makes no difference to me. Since your last edit was prior to our disagreement on the word probably you should be able to logically conclude I dont think you edited it to "win a petty argument". I think you edited to make the changes you already discussed and added the word probably without realizing it. You want to fight about it great.

Has nothing to do with whether we should be negotiating a loa and a contract at same time. You think it is a good idea and are hoping it is so. I dont.

 

Ja woal mein poster approval nazi. Learn to spell and quit picking fights. Big day ahead.

 

[QUOTE=FDXLAG;836837]Glad u r done, I didnt imply anything. I said I think you added probably during your edit. We obviously have 2 different memories of the event. When I 1st read your post there was no probably, you remember it differently, makes no difference to me. Since your last edit was prior to our disagreement on the word probably you should be able to logically conclude I dont think you edited it to "win a petty argument". I think you edited to make the changes you already discussed and added the word probably without realizing it. You want to fight about it great.

Has nothing to do with whether we should be negotiating a loa and a contract at same time. You think it is a good idea and are hoping it is so. I dont.[/QUOTE

OK....I misread you...I apologize......for the record, I don't think it is a good idea, though I think it is likely the company may try it......once again, a wag.......more so for CGN then HKG......That being said...if the company unilaterally improved HKG to induce more to bid......I don't have a problem with that since SS can approve any change to LOA IAW authority given to him in LOA#2. I am not willing to give up any negotiating capital to improve HKG though. As far as CGN goes.....if they want an LOA for that.....well then we can put it in a new contract.

 

Obviously.