Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FedEx wins ruling on contract drivers >

FedEx wins ruling on contract drivers

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FedEx wins ruling on contract drivers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2010, 11:33 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TheBaron's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 608
Default FedEx wins ruling on contract drivers

Maybe this is why CNBC is interviewing the Boss next week.

FedEx Wins Ruling That Contract Drivers Seeking Benefits Aren't Employees - Bloomberg
TheBaron is offline  
Old 12-15-2010, 03:49 AM
  #2  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 616
Default

Amazing what you can get when you can buy the judcial environment that works for you. IMO, no reasonable person would ever consider these "employees" contractors.

Best judges money can buy...
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 12-15-2010, 05:18 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
md11retiree's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Looking for "Confirm Engine Out" button
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by TheBaron View Post
Maybe this is why CNBC is interviewing the Boss next week.
What date and show, please.
md11retiree is offline  
Old 12-15-2010, 05:30 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bleedairpacks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: MD11 CA (rtd.)
Posts: 318
Default

Originally Posted by md11retiree View Post
What date and show, please.
12/20 on CNBC @ 0900.
bleedairpacks is offline  
Old 12-16-2010, 10:40 AM
  #5  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 727
Posts: 1
Default

Originally Posted by MEMFO4Ever View Post
Amazing what you can get when you can buy the judcial environment that works for you. IMO, no reasonable person would ever consider these "employees" contractors.

Best judges money can buy...
A lot of "reasonable guys" disagree with your point Or, by "reasonable," do you mean all those who agree with you? Most of these drivers love being "independent contractors." Ever talked to one of them? I have. Just because the teamsters and, by default UPS, has mobilized a few of them, in an attempt to attack the very successful FedEx business model in the courts, doesn't make this an issue. You have a very cynical outlook on the company that puts food on your table. Must suck to have so much hate?
FDX FTR is offline  
Old 12-16-2010, 11:23 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 93
Default

Maybe now they can pay ATA Airlines the $66 million they owe them as a result of the judgment they lost...

Skipper
tzskipper is offline  
Old 12-16-2010, 12:15 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,228
Default

CNBC is broadcasting live from the hub 6-9 am Monday.
Huck is offline  
Old 12-16-2010, 12:45 PM
  #8  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by FDX FTR View Post
A lot of "reasonable guys" disagree with your point Or, by "reasonable," do you mean all those who agree with you? Most of these drivers love being "independent contractors." Ever talked to one of them? I have. Just because the teamsters and, by default UPS, has mobilized a few of them, in an attempt to attack the very successful FedEx business model in the courts, doesn't make this an issue. You have a very cynical outlook on the company that puts food on your table. Must suck to have so much hate?
"Puts" food on my table? Nope, it is an exchange of services for money, nothing more. Don't read more into it than that. Just a job like any other.

I still believe these "contractors" are treated more like employees than "contractors" and exert little control over their "businesses" no matter what the purple spin machine may put out. But I guess we will just have to disagree.

And my cynicsim gets me through hub turns and annual training...
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 12-16-2010, 01:24 PM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 65
Default

FedEx did not create this contractor situation. It was in place and approved as RPS long before the business was purchased by FedEx. If you buy a McDonalds you must use their equipment, wear their uniforms, follow their rules then why can't you buy a route or work for a route owner under the same guidelines? Maybe the teamsters should go after all franchises if that is their true concern for the working men and women. I'm not sayng it's right or wrong but the government can't approve the model and have a massive system put in place then sold and then reversed at the buying companies expense. If forced to employ all ground contractors FedEx would most likely get rid of half of them(or more) and combine deliveries with Express which would strengthen the Teamsters(UPS's) case to remove them from the RLA. If you think any of this is out of concern for the drivers then make sure you hire them if it passes. Now let's go after the big money with McD's, B.K. and the rest of the franchise employees.
7700 is offline  
Old 12-16-2010, 01:31 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 727
Posts: 78
Default

fred RULES!
Fresh Hot Pizza is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
cub pilot
Cargo
20
04-23-2009 06:00 AM
HankHill
Cargo
35
04-06-2009 12:55 PM
Lambo
Cargo
5
07-12-2007 04:55 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices