Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
A Question You Need to Answer Before You Vote >

A Question You Need to Answer Before You Vote

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

A Question You Need to Answer Before You Vote

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2011 | 04:07 AM
  #21  
TheBaron's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Yes all of your post have been so civil I wonder why anyone dare oppose you. But feel free to dismiss the angry 12 or 20 since you are from the loyal majority.

PS the MEC admits the CGN loa is a bargaining chip why cant you?
Really? Maybe you haven't read the latest update (11-03):

7. Bottom line, we feel there is no more leverage in the FDA, especially when options exist to do business otherwise. We are not fear mongers, just the facts as we see them. Will FedEx use those options if this LOA is not approved? We can’t answer that. We are positive though, that our Company will continue to do business in effort to improve the shareholders’ returns.
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 04:17 AM
  #22  
FXDX's Avatar
Proponent of Hysteria
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
From: 3B
Default

Man, that is a big question. Here I was thinking it was just can I change my vote?!?
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 04:17 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Perhaps I just read between the lines where they said if this goes down they will just open it anyways and use SIBA for the FOs. Silly me that is not leverage.
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 04:18 AM
  #24  
ptarmigan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: B777 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Yes all of your post have been so civil I wonder why anyone dare oppose you. But feel free to dismiss the angry 12 or 20 since you are from the loyal majority.

PS the MEC admits the CGN loa is a bargaining chip why cant you?
Second part has been answered. First part, I never "dismissed" anyone, just, as I said in another post, pointed out that there is a risk of a false sense of unity on this forum.
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 04:28 AM
  #25  
ptarmigan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: B777 Captain
Default

All of this is a great example of this:

How facts backfire - The Boston Globe
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 05:18 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan
Second part has been answered. First part, I never "dismissed" anyone, just, as I said in another post, pointed out that there is a risk of a false sense of unity on this forum.
That is true just because it would cost fdx more pilots and more money to open an FDA without a new LOA it should not be considered leverage. Because um help me out here....
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 05:24 AM
  #27  
ptarmigan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: B777 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
That is true just because it would cost fdx more pilots and more money to open an FDA without a new LOA it should not be considered leverage. Because um help me out here....
Sorry, I should have finished my thought. I think it would cost a little more, but not a significant amount, particularly when balanced with other aspects in this TA. Not enough difference to constitute leverage of any significance.
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 05:26 AM
  #28  
MaxKts's Avatar
Part Time Employee
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan
Sorry, I should have finished my thought. I think it would cost a little more, but not a significant amount, particularly when balanced with other aspects in this TA. Not enough difference to constitute leverage of any significance.
So - it's leverage just not significant leverage?
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 05:26 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan
Sorry, I should have finished my thought. I think it would cost a little more, but not a significant amount, particularly when balanced with other aspects in this TA. Not enough difference to constitute leverage of any significance.
But in another thread you worry that the cost could reach the point where they hire the Irish pilots to take our place, right.
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 05:34 AM
  #30  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan
Second part has been answered. First part, I never "dismissed" anyone, just, as I said in another post, pointed out that there is a risk of a false sense of unity on this forum.
It has been answered, but is the answer correct? That is the big question. I would have to say that it is an incorrect answer.

Supposedly on the last FDA LOA our NC didnt think there was leverage. I believe they were dead wrong. Even though we have a new group negotiating, the same mistake can be made again.

I would submit that even if we do have leverage, the company could possibly tell us to take a hike anyway. A control thing. I could be wrong, but it is not out of the realm of reality. If that is the case, so be it. Ones vote should be principled, tempered with reality. I would go with the principled angle until reality has proven to be a sure thing.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alpar80
Regional
8
10-07-2008 11:14 AM
BrownGirls YUM
Cargo
206
07-08-2008 08:32 PM
Ellen
Regional
193
09-21-2007 06:11 PM
Freighter Captain
Major
2
05-12-2005 11:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices