Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FedEx-Whose idea for TA >

FedEx-Whose idea for TA

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FedEx-Whose idea for TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2011, 05:59 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 270
Default FedEx-Whose idea for TA

I may have missed this somewhere along the line, but whose idea was it for this "bridge" TA? Did the company propose it and the union liked the idea and agreed to it or was it the other way around?
1st overnite is offline  
Old 03-02-2011, 06:23 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ptarmigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 Captain
Posts: 566
Default

Originally Posted by 1st overnite View Post
I may have missed this somewhere along the line, but whose idea was it for this "bridge" TA? Did the company propose it and the union liked the idea and agreed to it or was it the other way around?
From the NC (emphasis added): "We decided to pursue a TA, which provided immediate improvements without giving away our opportunities to continue bargaining – albeit outside of the formal Section Six process. This TA represents exactly that."
ptarmigan is offline  
Old 03-02-2011, 06:30 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan View Post
From the NC (emphasis added): "We decided to pursue a TA, which provided immediate improvements without giving away our opportunities to continue bargaining – albeit outside of the formal Section Six process. This TA represents exactly that."
Sort of like swerving your car to the left, across the double lines, to avoid the skunk in the road while failing to notice that fuel tanker coming the other way.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 03-02-2011, 06:44 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Kinda sorta but not really.


Call it a train wreck if you want but the intent was to get something for the company desired FDA LOA.
Gunter is offline  
Old 03-02-2011, 08:19 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,193
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
....but the intent was to get something for the company desired FDA LOA.
Does this mean the NC thought we had/have "leverage"?
DLax85 is offline  
Old 03-02-2011, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by DLax85 View Post
Does this mean the NC thought we had/have "leverage"?
Yes. Between $200 - $400 each. You know, that "time-value" of money thing.
Busboy is offline  
Old 03-03-2011, 10:53 AM
  #7  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by ptarmigan View Post
From the NC (emphasis added): "We decided to pursue a TA, which provided immediate improvements without giving away our opportunities to continue bargaining – albeit outside of the formal Section Six process. This TA represents exactly that."
Thats what they said, but it doesnt answer his Q. To pursue something that may have been offered is different from proposing something and presenting it to the Company. Big difference. Not sure what the case was.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 03-03-2011, 11:17 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dadof6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Trunk Monkey
Posts: 562
Default My (imperfect) take

A complete answer can be found on the 50-minute DVD from the NC which recounted the progression and time line. I recommend you watch it, if you haven't already done so. There is probably a copy/link on the ALPA website also. In short, if I recall correctly, things were at a standstill due to the company's refusal to continue negotiations in light of unknown future impact of NPRM work rules. After approval from the MEC, the NC went to them with the FDA improvements/bridge TA idea. The company loved it. And here we are. I could be very well wrong--if so, please correct me.
Dadof6 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
8
01-01-2020 12:25 PM
forgot to bid
Cargo
6
09-30-2009 09:59 PM
Precontact
Cargo
1
10-21-2008 05:23 AM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
22
06-04-2008 01:16 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-05-2005 04:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices