FedEx-Whose idea for TA
03-02-2011 | 05:59 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
FedEx-Whose idea for TA
I may have missed this somewhere along the line, but whose idea was it for this "bridge" TA? Did the company propose it and the union liked the idea and agreed to it or was it the other way around?
03-02-2011 | 06:23 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: B777 Captain
From the NC (emphasis added): "We decided to pursue a TA, which provided immediate improvements without giving away our opportunities to continue bargaining – albeit outside of the formal Section Six process. This TA represents exactly that."
03-02-2011 | 06:30 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Retired
03-03-2011 | 10:53 AM
#7
"blue collar thug"!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
From: A proponent of...
Thats what they said, but it doesnt answer his Q. To pursue something that may have been offered is different from proposing something and presenting it to the Company. Big difference. Not sure what the case was.
03-03-2011 | 11:17 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: 767 Trunk Monkey
My (imperfect) take
A complete answer can be found on the 50-minute DVD from the NC which recounted the progression and time line. I recommend you watch it, if you haven't already done so. There is probably a copy/link on the ALPA website also. In short, if I recall correctly, things were at a standstill due to the company's refusal to continue negotiations in light of unknown future impact of NPRM work rules. After approval from the MEC, the NC went to them with the FDA improvements/bridge TA idea. The company loved it. And here we are. I could be very well wrong--if so, please correct me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
