Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Atlas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2011 | 08:56 AM
  #21  
Fillmore Slim's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 119
Likes: 1
Default

Heard 22 very recently also........also heard firsthand from a management type that Atlas is sold out of lift for CY 2011....fwiw

~Slim
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 09:12 AM
  #22  
O.T. Freight Dog
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Former 747 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by nattyboh
Where would they find 22 767 anyway?

First couple of PAX birds are used ones, most of the freighter's will be brand new built for Atlas.
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 01:24 PM
  #23  
744driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: B767 CA
Default

JimmyJr3,

As the saying goes...there is no stupid question.

Word on the line is that several management pilots/examiners have already been trained on the B767. There has been a "double secret" two-engine airplane project in the Training Dept for several years.

In fact, many of us line guys have seen the b767 operating manuals in the Training Center.

As for where the airplanes are going...several types of work has been mentioned. First is the AMC pax charters. Second, I have heard is DHL Worldwide for N Atlantic service for freighters.

Where would the airframes come from? Pax airplanes are likely coming from leasing companies and will likely be used ones. And the freighter will be new ones. At least, that is what I have heard.

Atlas does not buy airplanes for "expected growth". That is not the way they decide on anything. The philosophy has always been to buy airplanes, parts, people, etc only when new or existing customers are lined up.

My personal feeling is that they will not announce a new airplane type, and the customer roster, until our new CBA (contract) is finished. And that is likely going to happen in the next couple of months.

Good luck.
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 03:49 PM
  #24  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyJr3
Forgive me for my ignorance as I've just started clicking and sniffing around Atlas, and I fear based on the knowledge of company shown in this thread that I am about to ask a really stupid question. So I expect some teasing, but everybody seems to be really excited about the potential of adding 76's to the Atlas fleet. I am just curious as to why? I'll expect a few jabs and heckling in reponse,...and I can take it. But after that stuff subsides, I really would like to know ha! Thanks guys.

Jim
Purely from a piloting standpoint, the 757/767 (I have flown both) is just another aircraft when compared to the 747, but so is every other transport ever made, its either a whale or its not.

However, it will provide the smaller gauge some customers want.

From a seniority list standpoint, it is not about the numbers above you on the list. The magic is how many are below you.
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 04:09 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: What day is it?
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyJr3
I get the growth part and that is certainly exciting, but specifically to piloting this specific airplane, why? There seems to be this undertone that flying the 76 vs. the 74 would be a much better deal for an Atlas pilot? That's what I'm curious about. At the same time I could be way off. Thanks regardless!
No ingnorance in your questions at all.

Since the 2005 bankruptcy and new management team, they have had a couple of policies that are totally illigical in the industry. They don't sell the equipment rates for less than cost, they factor in a decent profit and if the prospective customer doesn't like it, there is someone down the road they should talk to.

Rule 2...they don't buy airplanes and then look for customers. They get the customer, and then put them into an airplane or if something different is needed, they go get it.

What sheer lunacy...right?

They have always maintained since 2005 that they would look at "light twins" based on customer need. What they have are customers who have decided they want the aircraft. A couple of things come to mind. First as I recall, a 747-400 is most cost effective on flight lengths of 8 hours or longer. So some markets, like South America will work, but can be more cost effective with a 767. (Remember, the customer is not only paying for the plane, they buy the gas too)

Second...Atlas is probably the best positioned carrier to become a "one stop shop" for AMC. Cargo, passengers and the strong rumor that future tanker ops will be flown by contract operators. I know, don't laugh or dismiss it...it has been out there for a number of years and they have the ability to do it. If you already have experience with the plane.....

One could surmise that the 76 flying will be less "tedious" in terms of not as many long legs and heavy crews, based on where they may be deployed. Time will tell.

One thing is certain. The management team thinks outside the traditional airline box and has done an amazing job with the company. The first 12 747-8's are coming later this year, the options on 14 more will be exercised...all having homes to go to. Add the 76's and what is projected in earnings per share this year...not bad at all.

And with the new pilot contract? With no offense to our brothers out there...who needs to be purple or brown?
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 04:17 PM
  #26  
NightIP's Avatar
Tuk er jerbs!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: B747 Left
Default

Hmmmmm...767s eh?

What's competitive these days? 3100TT and about 1000 turbine...currently on the 767/757 at another company...0 TPIC unfortunately, but I've got oceanic and long-haul international experience.

Just fishing...not really in a hurry to make any moves, but it never hurts to ask.
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 04:34 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat

tanker ops will be flown by contract operators. I know, don't laugh or dismiss it...it has been out there for a number of years and they have the ability to do it.
Not unrealistic at all. In fact, already being done by 707's with an outfit called Omega.
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 05:02 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Default

744D and ATC,

Thanks a million for the info,...that all gets my juices flowing,...hope I get a call..

Last edited by JimmyJr3; 04-04-2011 at 05:27 PM.
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 07:31 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat
No ingnorance in your questions at all.

Since the 2005 bankruptcy and new management team, they have had a couple of policies that are totally illigical in the industry. They don't sell the equipment rates for less than cost, they factor in a decent profit and if the prospective customer doesn't like it, there is someone down the road they should talk to.

Rule 2...they don't buy airplanes and then look for customers. They get the customer, and then put them into an airplane or if something different is needed, they go get it.

What sheer lunacy...right?

They have always maintained since 2005 that they would look at "light twins" based on customer need. What they have are customers who have decided they want the aircraft. A couple of things come to mind. First as I recall, a 747-400 is most cost effective on flight lengths of 8 hours or longer. So some markets, like South America will work, but can be more cost effective with a 767. (Remember, the customer is not only paying for the plane, they buy the gas too)

Second...Atlas is probably the best positioned carrier to become a "one stop shop" for AMC. Cargo, passengers and the strong rumor that future tanker ops will be flown by contract operators. I know, don't laugh or dismiss it...it has been out there for a number of years and they have the ability to do it. If you already have experience with the plane.....

One could surmise that the 76 flying will be less "tedious" in terms of not as many long legs and heavy crews, based on where they may be deployed. Time will tell.

One thing is certain. The management team thinks outside the traditional airline box and has done an amazing job with the company. The first 12 747-8's are coming later this year, the options on 14 more will be exercised...all having homes to go to. Add the 76's and what is projected in earnings per share this year...not bad at all.

And with the new pilot contract? With no offense to our brothers out there...who needs to be purple or brown?
So how does this work when the contract runs out or altered? I'm guessing most of Atlas aircraft are leased?

Growth is great but just wondering how fast his can come unfolded if somebody comes in and underbids?

KC
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 09:02 PM
  #30  
atpcliff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

Most of the aircraft are owned by Atlas WWH. Some aircraft are only operated by Atlas, and some will be leased.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EZRider
Cargo
2
03-09-2010 06:18 AM
F15andMD11
Cargo
18
03-03-2010 04:37 PM
jungle
Money Talk
48
12-28-2009 11:11 AM
GIANT PILOT
Cargo
33
06-13-2008 05:22 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices