FedEx MEC on wrong Track
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Yes ALPA National sign off on all contracts. As to whether or not they would allow agency shop to disapear, kind of if pigs had wings question. FDX likes the controversy and the MEC would never give it up. It takes a lawyer.
#32
Actually God, family, and country come before my career. But you comrade can prioritize anyway you want. Because the founders of this country (and amazingly a lot of the founders of the US labor movement) believed in liberty and the right to work were you want not where some self righteous schmuck tried to tell you to.
PS how is the multiple airline syndrome mentality working out in the Pax service?
PS how is the multiple airline syndrome mentality working out in the Pax service?
#33
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
It would take a lawsuit and somebody with enough interest to pursue it. Supposing it got through the MEC; ALPA National would never approve a contract that had the clause removed. You could probably get a right to work group to support you if you were interested. Of course you would be a pariah to some of your militant peers.
You mean to tell me that ALPA National can disapprove a contract that we as a pilot group vote to accept? If it doesn't compromise ALPA's Code of Ethics, I don't see how National would have the right to reject it.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
#36
Just to clarify...it's not my plan to quit the union. The reason I wanted agancy shop in 2006 was because the thought of non-members benefitting from the contract that we were paying for pi$$ed me off.
It is now my opinion, though, that having the ability to quit and take our money with us might actually keep ALPA more focused and energized on helping us attain our collective goals. As it stands right now, I can't see any reason for ALPA to do or say anything that we want them to unless it directly benefits them. They have our money and that's what they want. If what is being done makes us happy in the process, that's just icing on the cake. If we aren't satisfied with the service we are receiving, tough cookies. Thanks for your patience with my questions; our "union" has bigger problems right now then agency shop and dues complaints, so this will just have to wait.
I don't know what is going on between the various MEC members, LEC's, block reps and committtee members; I'm not sure that I really want to.
One thing is for certain - We are not acting like a unified group of pilots right now, and this is not good.
We are 12 months from our contract being amendable (again) and just lost the Chairman and Vice Chirman of our Negotiating Committee. If we can't stop the personal attacks and swallow our pride on certain issues for the greater good of the pilot force, we are going to get our a$$e$ handed to us in the next round of discussions. Right now, we are our own worst enemies!
How do we fix this?
Stay active, informed and involved.
Participate - Vote, Call to Arms, etc.
Talk to your reps and ask questions.
Voice your opinion.
Listen to the other side.
PROFESSIONALLY support the decision when it is finally made.
and most importantly, KEEP IT IN HOUSE!!!
Just my 2 cents...
Fly Safe!
Last edited by HerkDriver; 02-28-2012 at 06:29 AM.
#37
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: First Officer
We are 12 months from our contract being amendable (again) and just lost the Chairman and Vice Chirman of our Negotiating Committee. If we can't stop the personal attacks and swallow our pride on certain issues for the greater good of the pilot force, we are going to get our a$$e$ handed to us in the next round of discussions. Right now, we are our own worst enemies!
Next time you see those responsible you may want to thank them

I plan on thanking them via recall ballot.
#38
As a professional airline pilot, I'd highly recommend that you read "Flying the Line Part II".
As a former military pilot, ensconced in a sheltered world, I naively believed in most so called egalitarian "republican ideals", that were the defacto "culture" in the military, existed as well in big business.
I was wrong. Mostly just ignorant of the management-labor/owner of capital vs owners of labor history in our good country. (because we never had to deal with it in the military). After you do some bonafide research of the factual history of our industry you may draw your own conclusions.
After sitting in the BK courtroom & watching the BK of UAL proceedings, I took an active interest in understanding this. I was apalled at the actions presented in the book, "Flying the Line II", and even did independent research to validate & verify. Reading further labor/management hsitory of our railroads (where do you think the railway labor act comes from??) you'll see the airlines management just copied what the railroads did to labor earlier in US history.
The only thing that has changed is that labor has not learned what is being foist upon them. Both groups tend to overreach, and at times each gets hurt. However, in the long run, the working man who is neither sufficiently educated, nor with the organizational, historical or financial clout is the one disadvantaged. That is the sole reason for the affiliation that you find troubling.
I'm quite sure, if you are intellectually honest, and put your past bias aside while you learn about our profession, you will understand. You might not like it, you'll find out some of our countries' leaders (gov & industry) took action that you might never think they would-but they did.
For me it took the event of a bankruptcy, and loss of a pension & ESOP stock to wake up and "smell the coffe" - to get smart on the real playing field we're on. Most guys here at FDX have not been thru such a traumatic experience, and as you've heard, comfort leads to complacency and expectation bias- thus no motivation to "learn" the new environment of just being labor for a big business. i.e we've had it relatively ok at FDX, so by & large there hasn't been an impetus for the average line guy to delve into the subject, so he lives with his learned experience (military- cuz that's what we knew).
As a former military pilot, ensconced in a sheltered world, I naively believed in most so called egalitarian "republican ideals", that were the defacto "culture" in the military, existed as well in big business.
I was wrong. Mostly just ignorant of the management-labor/owner of capital vs owners of labor history in our good country. (because we never had to deal with it in the military). After you do some bonafide research of the factual history of our industry you may draw your own conclusions.
After sitting in the BK courtroom & watching the BK of UAL proceedings, I took an active interest in understanding this. I was apalled at the actions presented in the book, "Flying the Line II", and even did independent research to validate & verify. Reading further labor/management hsitory of our railroads (where do you think the railway labor act comes from??) you'll see the airlines management just copied what the railroads did to labor earlier in US history.
The only thing that has changed is that labor has not learned what is being foist upon them. Both groups tend to overreach, and at times each gets hurt. However, in the long run, the working man who is neither sufficiently educated, nor with the organizational, historical or financial clout is the one disadvantaged. That is the sole reason for the affiliation that you find troubling.
I'm quite sure, if you are intellectually honest, and put your past bias aside while you learn about our profession, you will understand. You might not like it, you'll find out some of our countries' leaders (gov & industry) took action that you might never think they would-but they did.
For me it took the event of a bankruptcy, and loss of a pension & ESOP stock to wake up and "smell the coffe" - to get smart on the real playing field we're on. Most guys here at FDX have not been thru such a traumatic experience, and as you've heard, comfort leads to complacency and expectation bias- thus no motivation to "learn" the new environment of just being labor for a big business. i.e we've had it relatively ok at FDX, so by & large there hasn't been an impetus for the average line guy to delve into the subject, so he lives with his learned experience (military- cuz that's what we knew).
Thats right, nothing. And neither did any of their PAC money.
#39
Part Time Employee
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



