![]() |
Originally Posted by 4A2B
(Post 1333384)
you must have been living under a rock :), it is in the news even today due to the push for limiting or banning PED's. Just google it but to answer your Q it was the former carrier based in Minnesota.
|
Originally Posted by 2dogs
(Post 1333712)
I'm thinkin' that little birdie is crappin' in the wrong tree because I'm still DHing on them next trip. :confused:
No longer deadheading on CZ they switched me to Asiana, so I'm guessing the rumor about CZ being taken off the approved list is true. Thanks to the O.P for documenting his issues and making things safer for us all and thanks to the company for doing the right thing. |
Originally Posted by MaxKts
(Post 1333402)
Not living under a rock! I just don't remember any part of the story that said they overflew by 200 miles. In fact, the FAA's reference to 150 miles is an exaggeration!
Who knows, before the end of the year it will probably be; they overflew by 500 miles and landed on fumes with one engine flamed out and a flight attendant at the controls because the crew was passed out drunk and flying in their underwear! :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Purpletailed10
(Post 1333744)
Just had the pairing I'm on at the moment changed by the company.
No longer deadheading on CZ they switched me to Asiana, so I'm guessing the rumor about CZ being taken off the approved list is true. Thanks to the O.P for documenting his issues and making things safer for us all and thanks to the company for doing the right thing. One thing that does bother me is that I'm not sure if it was my actions of the ops report and emails making this change, or was it this forum..... All I know is that I still have not received any formal response even to let me know that the ops report or emails were received in the first place. That I find disconcerting..... |
Originally Posted by sunburn
(Post 1333973)
All I know is that I still have not received any formal response even to let me know that the ops report or emails were received in the first place. That I find disconcerting.....
|
DH Changed
Originally Posted by sunburn
(Post 1333973)
I have just heard through indirect channels that over 1100 DHs have been cancelled on China Southern. I'm not sure when the decision was made or by whom, but I do think that it is a good move for us at least temporarily until this issue is resolved. As above posts suggest, this might have been a singular error of the crew and not a culture at this airline. I just didn't like being the one having to "ride" it out.
One thing that does bother me is that I'm not sure if it was my actions of the ops report and emails making this change, or was it this forum..... All I know is that I still have not received any formal response even to let me know that the ops report or emails were received in the first place. That I find disconcerting..... |
Originally Posted by FrontSeat
(Post 1333978)
Are you sure you don't wear brown pants?
Impossible, his company already took proactive action and rebooked future DHs ... ;) |
Originally Posted by sunburn
(Post 1333973)
... All I know is that I still have not received any formal response even to let me know that the ops report or emails were received in the first place. That I find disconcerting.....
|
Don't know why this was'nt brought up but the question I have is why the O.P. did not address his concerns to the crew upon arrival at dest.?
http://imageshack.us/a/img708/2789/birdfluflight.gif |
Originally Posted by DYNASTY HVY
(Post 1334144)
Don't know why this was'nt brought up but the question I have is why the O.P. did not address his concerns to the crew upon arrival at dest.?
http://imageshack.us/a/img708/2789/birdfluflight.gif |
He landed in CAN
According to Google, that flight goes NRT to CAN.
So, you are entering communist China, do you really want to call the Captain to task?:confused: Perhaps show him the pics you took?:eek: You might get to meet the local cops, and have a little visit to the big house on some trumped up charges. They would also take your camera to destroy the evidence. Personally, I am of the opinion that the OP did the right thing. Of course, you guys do what you want. |
Originally Posted by Nightflyer
(Post 1334171)
According to Google, that flight goes NRT to CAN.
So, you are entering communist China, do you really want to call the Captain to task?:confused: Perhaps show him the pics you took?:eek: You might get to meet the local cops, and have a little visit to the big house on some trumped up charges. They would also take your camera to destroy the evidence. Personally, I am of the opinion that the OP did the right thing. Of course, you guys do what you want. I,m sure the crew was well aware of what they had on the wings and showing pictures would be a moot point. |
Originally Posted by DYNASTY HVY
(Post 1334144)
Don't know why this wasn't brought up but the question I have is why the O.P. did not address his concerns to the crew upon arrival at dest.?
|
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
(Post 1334036)
Might be some legal concerns they have to run through the lawyers before or if they respond.
MG2 |
Originally Posted by SonnyD
(Post 1334262)
Um, pardon me for not finding the value in this. What would you see being the best possible outcome should your suggested course of action have come to pass?
|
Originally Posted by DYNASTY HVY
(Post 1334273)
Possibly a good answer from the crew during the course of conversation.
Result: defensive crew. Good luck with a positive outcome in that situation. |
Sunburn:
Good on ya for raising the BS flag and keeping the rest of us safe. I had a similar experience years ago on a domestic carrier. I complained twice to the head Stu before take off, and the carrier pulled off the taxiway to deice. I was later thanked by the captain. (Ground crew had lied to flight crew that plane was deiced when it was not. I witnessed the entire affair). I would file a complaint with the FAA since CZ flies into the US. I would also be careful when going thru China as they may find some way of retaliating against you. Might want to contact the embassy and consulate in PVG and CAN in case they come knocking on your hotel room in the middle of the night. Let them know what happened. Get a local phone number in case. Don't go anywhere in Chicom without a wingman. |
I was wondering if this could happen at all the airports and all the Chinese airlines? The other day we were sitting at ICN airport, and everyone was de-icing, Korean air, Asiana, Cathay, Thai, Singapore and of course there were delays for everyone. But I saw all the Chinese airlines taxi out, line up and off they go.
I think it has more to do with keeping your bonuses than airline not allowing deice. I wonder what would happen to your safety bonus when you crash and burn? |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 1333757)
To be fair to the guys in question (who no longer have jobs), they didn't overfly. ATC made them fly past the airport and populated areas to perform a series of confidence maneuvers. Every knows what they did wrong but nobody has heard the story of [b]what ATC and the company screwed up.Remember, it is almost always a chain of mistakes that lead to an accident.
Also, if, again IF that was the case, who's to say they would have answered an ACARS or SelCall (if applicable) message from company? I'm not bashing those guys. But sadly it's been proven, at the end of the day, the responsibility falls on the crew. If it can be passed down to the lowest level/highest profile level of accountability, it will. And yes, you're right. It would be interesting to see what th fallout was on the ATC/dispatch end was. |
Originally Posted by Nightflyer
(Post 1334171)
According to Google, that flight goes NRT to CAN.
So, you are entering communist China, do you really want to call the Captain to task?:confused: Perhaps show him the pics you took?:eek: You might get to meet the local cops, and have a little visit to the big house on some trumped up charges. They would also take your camera to destroy the evidence. Personally, I am of the opinion that the OP did the right thing. Of course, you guys do what you want. It probably would have been OK, but you could end up PNGed. The OP could still end up PNG if they find out who he is... |
He could've tried this
Chinese for "what the hell"=究竟想怎么样!
Say it to the Captain, then the cop, then the judge, then the jailor, then the nice guy from the embassy say's it to you :) |
Originally Posted by xjtguy
(Post 1335192)
True. I can't remember, didn't ATC repeatedtly call them and the calls went unanswered?
Also, if, again IF that was the case, who's to say they would have answered an ACARS or SelCall (if applicable) message from company? I'm not bashing those guys. But sadly it's been proven, at the end of the day, the responsibility falls on the crew. If it can be passed down to the lowest level/highest profile level of accountability, it will. And yes, you're right. It would be interesting to see what th fallout was on the ATC/dispatch end was. |
Originally Posted by Lineslug
(Post 1335227)
Just conjecturing, but if they flew out of radio coverage with ATC, as frequently happens, they might have noticed the flashing acars msg or selcall chime. I've had it happen in the middle of the night when ATC forgets to hand you off and you fly out of coverage, and gotten an acars msg to contact ATC on xxx freq from dispatch.
Whether it was ATC calls that may have gone unnoticed, an ACARS that went unnoticed, ATC trying to relay to another aircraft to contact them as frequently happens, trying to reach them over guard/121.5, etc etc etc etc........ |
I agree. To get back to the subject, it's good to see that FDX did the right thing and cancelled their DH's on CZ. It would be nice if UPS did the same thing, but all they look at is the savings by using a cheap airline. I'd be happily surprised if we did it as well, but certainly not holding my breath.
|
Should there be a list?
|
Originally Posted by MaydayMark
(Post 1336019)
BI must have needed the advertising revenue . |
"But I saw all the Chinese airlines taxi out, line up and off they go."
Yep, standard practice. FWIW, I flew for Air China (A330 skipper) for 3 years and nearly every time we deiced it was under protest from the remaining (Chinese) crew. I insisted on deice one night from PEK when the jet had been parked in SN for 24 hours and had snow on the wings up to the top of the fuse and the guys still tried to pretend "we be ok captain, no need for deice". Also, when you do convince them to deice, they use Chinese made fluids that do not adhere to any standards and they make up whatever holdover time will get you away without delay. And the engineer will tell you its whatever type fluid you asked for. "Is it type baked beans fluid" "ahhhh yes captain, thats what it is" And the engineer will meet you at the crew bus and try to convince you that the wing is clean, no need for you to check and will follow you around hoping you dont take a peek at the wing from the mid cabin windows. In many many ways these guys just dont get it!!!! Rant over, sorry, now its back to my post Chinese contract therapy!!!!! Calm blue ocean, calm blue ocean, calm......... |
Originally Posted by oicur12
(Post 1339956)
Rant over, sorry, now its back to my post Chinese contract therapy!!!!!
Calm blue ocean, calm blue ocean, calm.........
Originally Posted by sunburn
I have just heard through indirect channels that over 1100 DHs have been cancelled on China Southern.
As for confronting the crew ... the folly and danger of doing such a thing in totalitarian China has already been mentioned. Note also that the English skill of many Chinese pilots is atrocious, at least among those flying domestic routes . They likely wouldn't have understood you. |
rotorhead
"The situation usually got rectified pretty quickly". I flew for several South Asian carriers also (probably same as you lah) and these sorts of issues would slowly get solved also. One by one. But not in China. Presenting a picture of a wing covered in snow and ice to your supervisors in a Chinese airline is not viewed very well. What would appear to a westerner to be an attempt to highlight a safety deficiency would be seen by a Chinese manager as questioning the honesty of the people charged with dispatching the jet. |
Originally Posted by oicur12
(Post 1339993)
rotorhead
"The situation usually got rectified pretty quickly". I flew for several South Asian carriers also (probably same as you lah) and these sorts of issues would slowly get solved also. One by one. But not in China. Presenting a picture of a wing covered in snow and ice to your supervisors in a Chinese airline is not viewed very well. What would appear to a westerner to be an attempt to highlight a safety deficiency would be seen by a Chinese manager as questioning the honesty of the people charged with dispatching the jet. |
Originally Posted by sunburn
(Post 1331211)
Well nothing more fun that being held hostage to a flight crew that doesnt think physics applies to them. During the recent snow storm in NRT, I was deadheading out on China Southern flt 386. We boarded and had a clean wing, but soon started to accumulate. From boarding to takeoff, was approx 2hr and the company never deiced. I was sure we were going to get squirted at the end of the runway but the pilot whipped onto the runway and immeadiately pushed up the power. I would estimate we had 2inches of clutter on the wings on takeoff roll. At 10000 ft we still had 20% of the wing covered with ice. See links for photos. First one was about 60 minutes before takeoff when he configured. By takeoff it was 2 to 3 times as thick. Second picture is during climbout after about 10minutes.
http://i1282.photobucket.com/albums/...psa47fccd5.jpg http://i1282.photobucket.com/albums/...psee32e5b1.jpg I know Fedex wants to save money on airfares, but this was outright dangerous, and I feel lucky to be alive. There were four fedex crewmembers on board this flight that might not have been here if Boeing hadn't made such an awesome wing on their 737. I've filed a ops report as have several of the other guys, I just hope we stop using these guys. Pl |
Originally Posted by Dashdog
(Post 1340664)
Am I the only one thinking- Man, we have been wasting a huge amount of money and time on this whole deicing business- after seeing this? I saw that Russian Airbus video a few months ago, and now this. ***? I thought something like one-one-millionth of a centimeter of frost can reduce your lift by 800%. Maybe the deicing fluid industry is in bed with the FAA? Screw it, I'm not wasting any more time at the deice pad ever again. I'm going 'Chinese Style'!
MG2 |
Originally Posted by MacGuy2
(Post 1340710)
Is "Chinese Style" the same as Air Florida style?:eek:
MG2 |
Originally Posted by Dashdog
(Post 1340664)
Am I the only one thinking- Man, we have been wasting a huge amount of money and time on this whole deicing business- after seeing this? I saw that Russian Airbus video a few months ago, and now this. ***? I thought something like one-one-millionth of a centimeter of frost can reduce your lift by 800%. Maybe the deicing fluid industry is in bed with the FAA? Screw it, I'm not wasting any more time at the deice pad ever again. I'm going 'Chinese Style'!
|
Originally Posted by N9373M
(Post 1340732)
There was alot more wrong with Palm 90 than just skipping the 2nd deice.
|
Originally Posted by Dashdog
(Post 1340948)
Correct. The real problem wasn't ice on the wings, it was ice on the EPR probes due to the crew not turning on engine anti-ice. Actual thrust at T/O was something like 60%. Ice on the wings didn't help.
Between the power setting mentioned above and the MD-80 wing having issues, we have waaay too many procedures and derivatives of fluid formulas. Common sense, what? no! We need to deice every single aircraft with type IV safeco double deluxe industrial hold anytime Ewins says there could be a 5 minute delay due to frost for the night sort........and fly into the sort no matter what, even if there is 6 inches of clear ice in the forecast.....:rolleyes::rolleyes: |
I work in Japan, not China mind you but I do fly in and out of China a lot. For what I have seen (and I couldn't care less, not defending anybody) airlines in China tend to be way too conservative in terms of their de-icing, I have seen them de ice even when there is no need to. I have a feeling there is a problem with this particular crew and not necessarily with the company's safety culture per say.
|
Originally Posted by Dashdog
(Post 1340948)
Correct. The real problem wasn't ice on the wings, it was ice on the EPR probes due to the crew not turning on engine anti-ice. Actual thrust at T/O was something like 60%. Ice on the wings didn't help.
You have to wonder, with respect to CZ, what else they miss because they obviously do not understand the physics behind flying airplanes. Typical push button mentality of these fly-by-night airlines. So, does ALPA have any input into what carriers we deadhead on? Isn't safety our number one priority (or is it VEBA, I get confused sometimes). |
Originally Posted by Dashdog
(Post 1340664)
Am I the only one thinking- Man, we have been wasting a huge amount of money and time on this whole deicing business- after seeing this? I saw that Russian Airbus video a few months ago, and now this. ***? I thought something like one-one-millionth of a centimeter of frost can reduce your lift by 800%. Maybe the deicing fluid industry is in bed with the FAA? Screw it, I'm not wasting any more time at the deice pad ever again. I'm going 'Chinese Style'!
|
add Aeroflot to your list.. when I was at Gemini we had a few airlines on our no-fly list, and those were two... As a side note, I flew into Almaty Kazakstan quite a bit and they'd always look at us strange when we wanted to de-ice our 747's when they had some frost on the wings... some would actually try to argue we didn't need it... sigh.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:49 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands