Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   FedEx Special Standards (SS) (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/72913-fedex-special-standards-ss.html)

Gofly 02-05-2013 08:20 PM

FedEx Special Standards (SS)
 
So..quality assurance check rides "during non-flight duty time" hmmm iz zer paperwerk in order? iz dat parka yours? Non seniority manger flying and now the SS..diz iz bery interesting, no?

4A2B 02-06-2013 05:01 AM


Originally Posted by Gofly (Post 1346783)
So..quality assurance check rides "during non-flight duty time" hmmm iz zer paperwerk in order? iz dat parka yours? Non seniority manger flying and now the SS..diz iz bery interesting, no?

While I could be wrong, I have heard this statement means they are "checking" the issues we have on layovers (GT, Hotel, ramp issues etc) and not doing a LOSA of your actions while not on duty. I think we might have a little problem with that.

HDawg 02-06-2013 05:13 AM

A standards guy on board is a standards guy on board. I wonder if they will be on any disputed pairings?

MaydayMark 02-06-2013 05:23 AM


Originally Posted by HDawg (Post 1346854)
A standards guy on board is a standards guy on board. I wonder if they will be on any disputed pairings?

I didn't know that there were any MEM-ATL-MEM or MEM-DFW-MEM disputed pairings? :eek:

Gunter 02-06-2013 05:32 AM


Originally Posted by 4A2B (Post 1346847)
While I could be wrong, I have heard this statement means they are "checking" the issues we have on layovers (GT, Hotel, ramp issues etc) and not doing a LOSA of your actions while not on duty. I think we might have a little problem with that.

Holy Duplication of Effort Batman!

Why don't they just bump a crew and fly the trip themselves if that's the case? You know, get the full fatigue/ground issues/what it feels like experience.

Nice cover story but it doesn't hold water. My guess - monitoring crew performance is the real goal.

Gunter 02-06-2013 05:36 AM


Originally Posted by MaydayMark (Post 1346862)
I didn't know that there were any MEM-ATL-MEM or MEM-DFW-MEM disputed pairings? :eek:

I'm sure they referenced ASAP/FOQA/PORs, as the FCIF stated, to find out which flight segments have been causing problems before building their monitoring schedule.

Maybe they should have asked the SIG for input on known problem segments. Unless they want to build a database on everything BUT problem segments.

FrankTheTank 02-06-2013 07:20 AM

Or they could actually read and respond to the Pilot Ops Reports...

FDX28 02-06-2013 01:27 PM


Originally Posted by HDawg (Post 1346854)
A standards guy on board is a standards guy on board. I wonder if they will be on any disputed pairings?

They are NOT standards guys. That's why the FCIF said they are Company Check Airmen - not a Line Check Airman. That's why they should be "treated" like an ACM not a jumpseater....

FDX28 02-06-2013 01:30 PM

Also, the second they talk on taxi-out, critical phase of flight , etc... or distract me from my job... They're going to the back. I'm sure the FAA would love to know that the FDX SS are violating FAR's while acting as "Company Check Airmen"....


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands