FedEx buys 30 757s from UA
04-03-2013 | 08:34 AM
#32
Organizational Learning
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
So far, only Doogs and boxmover have offered answers for the first question; Huck and propilot have addressed the cost savings questions. Which questions can you answer?
P.S. Are you trying to circumvent the automatic language censor with "creative" spelling of what it must consider to be "strong, vulgar, obscene or otherwise harmful language" (Terms and Conditions) so you can call me a name? tssk, tssk
.
04-03-2013 | 08:37 AM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
They're honest questions that, I believe, deserve honest answers.
So far, only Doogs and boxmover have offered answers for the first question; Huck and propilot have addressed the cost savings questions. Which questions can you answer?
P.S. Are you trying to circumvent the automatic language censor with "creative" spelling of what it must consider to be "strong, vulgar, obscene or otherwise harmful language" (Terms and Conditions) so you can call me a name? tssk, tssk
.
So far, only Doogs and boxmover have offered answers for the first question; Huck and propilot have addressed the cost savings questions. Which questions can you answer?
P.S. Are you trying to circumvent the automatic language censor with "creative" spelling of what it must consider to be "strong, vulgar, obscene or otherwise harmful language" (Terms and Conditions) so you can call me a name? tssk, tssk
.
04-03-2013 | 08:43 AM
#34
Organizational Learning
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
I guess I need to wait to respond until you search your vast vocabulary and decide which names you want to call me and then finish editing your post.
Jerk - hey, that's a nice one. Big thumbs up.
.
Jerk - hey, that's a nice one. Big thumbs up.
.
04-03-2013 | 08:50 AM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
Yah Tony, you butt!
How dare you question the language that is going to be part of our CBA. We know from past experience that our contract language is rock solid. Completely in accord with what we think the intent is.
Besides, even if the language was a tad gray...we know that the company would never take advantage of it.
How dare you question the language that is going to be part of our CBA. We know from past experience that our contract language is rock solid. Completely in accord with what we think the intent is.
Besides, even if the language was a tad gray...we know that the company would never take advantage of it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
