Originally Posted by woog315
(Post 2572446)
Im gonna level with you- I have no idea what you're talking about. I can tell you I have done cvg-hrl-mmmy and laid over in MMMY well over a dozen times and cvg-iah-hrl is a brand new flight that no one has seen until this bid period. (It may have happened a few times in April, I dunno). There hasn't been any ABX layover in HRL in years, except a few peak season oddities as add ons.
|
Originally Posted by nitefr8dog
(Post 2572456)
You nailed it...you dunno! The letter says...In addition, aircraft 787AX will be redeployed to DHL Middle East service after its upcoming C-check starting on June 4. As a result, ABX will discontinue operating the 518/118 IAH-MSY route. The last operation is currently planned to be Friday, June 1, after which another carrier will operate the route. The day 6 CVG-IAH-HRL & day 7 HRL-CVG routes 315/316 will continue to operate as normal.....key words...operate as normal. I personally have flown this trip 4 times over a 6 month period.
Edit: ok I went and looked, its a weekend run. I've never done it or noticed it. I apologize, it doesn't affect the MMMY run for now. I was mistaken. Still losing planes and routes... |
Originally Posted by woog315
(Post 2572459)
Ok... Cool? What is your point? We are losing planes and losing flights. I guess we we were doing 2 HRL flights, now we're doing one? Whoopdie Doo?
|
Originally Posted by woog315
(Post 2572459)
Ok... Cool? What is your point? We are losing planes and losing flights. I really don't care about the specifics of the routes. I've never come across iah-hrl.. is it a 1 day a week thing or something?
Edit: ok I went and looked, its a weekend run. I've never done it or noticed it. I apologize, it doesn't affect the MMMY run for now. I was mistaken. Still losing planes and routes... |
Originally Posted by woog315
(Post 2572459)
Ok... Cool? What is your point? We are losing planes and losing flights. I really don't care about the specifics of the routes. I've never come across iah-hrl.. is it a 1 day a week thing or something?
Edit: ok I went and looked, its a weekend run. I've never done it or noticed it. I apologize, it doesn't affect the MMMY run for now. I was mistaken. Still losing planes and routes... I heard someone on reserve get this trip, but it was probably 6 months ago. Even if this has been on the flight dept site for 2 years, no one talks about overnighting in HRL...hardly ever. But I think we should all just drop this. Cool, HRL is a layover. We'll get the word out. LOL! MMMY...anything could be possible at this point. $&%# we lost EWR!!! Come on, right! |
The real point is that in 2014 ABX had 36-767's. After losing 2 more the final count will be 24. Ops specs D085. Then what happens when NAC gets up and going in MIA and LAX?
|
We all get furlough notes and karramba!!!!:-))
|
Originally Posted by GeelErmo
(Post 2573638)
We all get furlough notes and karramba!!!!:-))
|
Originally Posted by C7fr8dog
(Post 2573631)
The real point is that in 2014 ABX had 36-767's. After losing 2 more the final count will be 24. Ops specs D085. Then what happens when NAC gets up and going in MIA and LAX?
|
Originally Posted by nitefr8dog
(Post 2574151)
Well....we should not see much change in LAX as AeroMex flying is not involved with Aloha or NAC and we already lost HNL. In MIA it should free up a 300 and a 200 as NAC gets new aircraft from CAM. It's possible both would be used for Amazon. Most likely the a 200 will be parked. Since 752 is supposedly coming back from Bahrain that makes 25. At the least ATI will not get them... yippee
752 is all ready back Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
752
Originally Posted by johnny150
(Post 2574171)
752 is all ready back
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Everyone that’s on property needs to keep the faith and hold the line. Certainly keep your options open. If you’re off property thank you for not coming here. My understanding is they tried to have a class at the beginning of the month and couldn’t get enough people to show up.
We may get a good contract someday until then I wouldn’t come here. |
There was supposed to be a class of 6 starting on the 27th. Looks like they found 2. Guess we’ll see in a week if they show up.
|
Originally Posted by nitefr8dog
(Post 2574151)
Well....we should not see much change in LAX as AeroMex flying is not involved with Aloha or NAC and we already lost HNL. In MIA it should free up a 300 and a 200 as NAC gets new aircraft from CAM. It's possible both would be used for Amazon. Most likely the a 200 will be parked. Since 752 is supposedly coming back from Bahrain that makes 25. At the least ATI will not get them... yippee
|
Originally Posted by C7fr8dog
(Post 2575756)
752 is already counted as one of the 24. Also, the owner of NAC, Aloha and Strat Air owns 30+ % of AeroMex and it’s already slatted to go away in 2019.
|
You guys need to be emailing your union leaders and asking them what they are doing about section 744 of this bill.
I’m emailing my union rep and I don’t even fly cargo. We are all in this industry together! https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2018-04-19/faa-bill-poised-reach-floor-next-week |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 2576492)
You guys need to be emailing your union leaders and asking them what they are doing about section 744 of this bill.
I’m emailing my union rep and I don’t even fly cargo. We are all in this industry together! https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...loor-next-week Other forums can ban a member for SPAMMING multiple threads. More to the point, did you read the last paragraph in the article YOU posted? ALPA, IBT and IPA are on it already. Give it a break. |
Do yourself a favor and stay away!
|
No part 117 rest here or any acmi!
Days to night flying night to day ....age quicker for less money then Spirit! |
Originally Posted by Industry Strnd
(Post 2638481)
No part 117 rest here or any acmi!
Days to night flying night to day ....age quicker for less money then Spirit! |
Originally Posted by nitefr8dog
(Post 2638814)
How about on the pax side at K4, ATI, Atlas? All ACMI but aren't they required to operate part 117?
|
Originally Posted by airbus300
(Post 2638817)
I guess 1 guy gets it.
|
Originally Posted by nitefr8dog
(Post 2638814)
How about on the pax side at K4, ATI, Atlas? All ACMI but aren't they required to operate part 117?
I can't speak for ATI, but as for Atlas: even if you are supposed to be operating under Part 117, you have to be on the lookout for schedulers who have been caught falsifying records in our scheduling software in order to make crews "legal" for Part 117 legs. |
Originally Posted by RyeMex
(Post 2638821)
For what it's worth (at least up until about a year ago), Atlas and ATI were the only airlines that operated under both part 121 and part 117. If K4 has added passenger service, I haven't heard anything about it.
I can't speak for ATI, but as for Atlas: even if you are supposed to be operating under Part 117, you have to be on the lookout for schedulers who have been caught falsifying records in our scheduling software in order to make crews "legal" for Part 117 legs. |
Originally Posted by nitefr8dog
(Post 2638828)
Noo....fudge the numbers? Say it ain't so!
|
Come work at ABX.. look at the planes you will get to fly..
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...e9625e7c11.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Originally Posted by johnny150
(Post 2642275)
Come work at ABX.. look at the planes you will get to fly..
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...e9625e7c11.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands