Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FedEx Passover Pay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2007, 06:01 PM
  #101  
SNAFU
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
What you seem to be missing is that these individuals bid out of ANC on a following bid and had not started training for ANC yet. They were then trained for ANC and did a touch and go there and then came to MEM ahead of all those that bid MEM on the same bid they did. Their ANC bid should have been canx and then trained in seniority order for MEM.

As far as gaming the system goes, we shouldn't have to game the system, especially when it comes to seniority. We are always told to bid what and where you want to fly.

If you don't have all of the info, maybe you shouldn't talk about the contract being clear in the area under dicussion, because it is clear to those of us who were affected.
Yes, bid what you want to fly. If you wanted ANC you should have bid it. A couple of guys transferring domiciles doesn't trigger passover pay. If the guy(s) didn't ever activate in ANC then yes they shouldn't have been trained ahead of senior guys waiting for training for MEM. The company should have pulled them out of training and put them back on the panel or right seat and let you guys go to training. That would likely have been the result of a grievance which is evidently what the union was trying to prevent. Just a guess.

I know it sounds condescending and I don't mean it to. I've only been here about 5 years, so I am a newbie too. The tone of the complaints is very off-putting and that is why you guys are not getting the support that you deserve. Yeah I spent my first two years on the panel on reserve and couldn't even sniff the right seat of the Boeing for 3 years, so I have difficulty seeing how the guys here a year or so feel slighted because a couple of guys got a better deal than them.

I know a lot of guys in Flight Test tried to volunteer to go fetch those 75s like they do every other new (to us) aircraft and none of them were selected to do so. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the union officials should have been more responsive, respectful and representative to your guys' concerns, that is for sure. I still don't see the huge injustice that many seem to feel though, because I am not all about the money I guess.

Anyway, I have dug myself a hole I had no intention of digging, I wish you all the best and I hope you all get your widebody training soon. I also hope the union officials see the need for a wakeup call before they really do damage to the unity we displayed over the past 2.5 years.
 
Old 02-25-2007, 07:48 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
130JDrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
What you seem to be missing is that these individuals bid out of ANC on a following bid and had not started training for ANC yet. They were then trained for ANC and did a touch and go there and then came to MEM ahead of all those that bid MEM on the same bid they did. Their ANC bid should have been canx and then trained in seniority order for MEM.

As far as gaming the system goes, we shouldn't have to game the system, especially when it comes to seniority. We are always told to bid what and where you want to fly.

If you don't have all of the info, maybe you shouldn't talk about the contract being clear in the area under dicussion, because it is clear to those of us who were affected.

It's late but let me take a shot at this. X bids ANC 11 fo on bid 1. Is assigned a training date prior to y who bid MEM 11 FO. On bid 2, X bids back to MEM and is activated prior to Y which bid it on bid 1. I think that's it.


It doesn't matter what x did on the second bid. If he stayed in ANC or not. The reason being is that that training slot will be filled by an ANC FO. Person Y would have never seen that training slot anyway.


Just the way it has been for awhile here..... As far a gaming the system, the company doesn't even know what their doing in 18 months. Long range planning here is next week.

Past....
130JDrvr is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 08:06 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
What you seem to be missing is that these individuals bid out of ANC on a following bid and had not started training for ANC yet. They were then trained for ANC and did a touch and go there and then came to MEM ahead of all those that bid MEM on the same bid they did. Their ANC bid should have been canx and then trained in seniority order for MEM.
It's never worked that way. The same scenario occured after the postal bid, but the ANC guys from the pre-Postal bid still went to their original training (after postal bid,) activated in ANC, and then transfered to MEM. In this case, however, there were no Purple nuggets to help them get out of ANC and some of those guys didn't get back to MEM until months after guys of their seniority who got MEM on the 2nd bid had activated. Did they think they got a bad deal? Yes! Was it legal by the CBA? Yes? Is life always fair? No! Get over it.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 08:47 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot View Post
It's never worked that way. The same scenario occured after the postal bid, but the ANC guys from the pre-Postal bid still went to their original training (after postal bid,) activated in ANC, and then transfered to MEM. In this case, however, there were no Purple nuggets to help them get out of ANC and some of those guys didn't get back to MEM until months after guys of their seniority who got MEM on the 2nd bid had activated. Did they think they got a bad deal? Yes! Was it legal by the CBA? Yes? Is life always fair? No! Get over it.


Very good info. The history preceding current events is enlightening.

I certainly have no disappointment considering it is such a good deal to hop into a widebody in one or two years here.

But I do hope the FDX Alpa website gets some good articles explaining historical precedent and how it relates to bidding and the contract so others won't get surprised again. It would save the membership and ALPA reps some wasted brain cells.
Gunter is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 02:48 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot View Post
It's never worked that way. The same scenario occured after the postal bid, but the ANC guys from the pre-Postal bid still went to their original training (after postal bid,) activated in ANC, and then transfered to MEM. In this case, however, there were no Purple nuggets to help them get out of ANC and some of those guys didn't get back to MEM until months after guys of their seniority who got MEM on the 2nd bid had activated. Did they think they got a bad deal? Yes! Was it legal by the CBA? Yes? Is life always fair? No! Get over it.
And the company testified in 02-02 that a following bid canx a previous bid if training hasn't started yet. The argument is that the contract should specify what happens when someone switches domiciles and hasn't started training for the first bid yet. Because it has happened in the past doesn't cut it. It should be in writing and as CB has been saying, both the company and ALPA have said it is a grey area. The company shouldn't be able to decide at their whim that one day they will canx training for a bid and the next day decide they won't. It needs to be written in the contract, and as of now, it still isn't. Before you say get over it again, Don't.

Last edited by pinseeker; 02-26-2007 at 03:39 AM.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 04:09 AM
  #106  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Coffee Bitch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
Default Wrong, Wrong, Wrong (as usual)

Originally Posted by SNAFU View Post
I know a lot of guys in Flight Test tried to volunteer to go fetch those 75s like they do every other new (to us) aircraft and none of them were selected to do so.
1234567890

Last edited by Coffee Bitch; 02-26-2007 at 08:49 AM.
Coffee Bitch is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 04:35 AM
  #107  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 540
Default

It's all fun and games until someone gets and eye poked out. Then it's just fun...
bifff15 is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 08:14 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
Before you say get over it again, Don't.
I say get over it, because in my experience with FPA and ALPA, the union won't press on an issue that affects only a few people (less than several hundred,) especially if the affected pilots are all junior. Not the way I would wish it to be, but that's the way it is!
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 10:21 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,223
Default

1234567890
Good call... You learn well, grasshoppah....
Huck is offline  
Old 05-21-2007, 07:54 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Bump.

This needs to be read and reread by the junior guys. There was a lot foreshadowing of the events of last month as long ago as February.
Albief15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8rmike
Cargo
22
09-11-2006 01:23 PM
MalteseX
Cargo
4
08-30-2006 04:23 PM
TonyC
Major
0
01-24-2006 05:21 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
3
11-30-2005 07:42 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices