Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Charter
ATI To Fly for Mokulele? >

ATI To Fly for Mokulele?

Search

Notices
Charter Part 121 pax charter airlines

ATI To Fly for Mokulele?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2012 | 03:17 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default ATI To Fly for Mokulele?

Lets see how long this lasts...

Mokulele’s Honolulu-Rockford-London Service is Really Happening | NYCAviation
Reply
Old 01-27-2012 | 05:36 PM
  #2  
captjns's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
10M Airline Miles
20 Years
150 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,218
Likes: 52
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Default

Originally Posted by Makai
My guess that London Stansted will be the airport of choice.

Well good luck... especially if it puts pilot back in cockpit.
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 02:26 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Default

As far as we've all heard, ATI is only doing the RFD-HNL part with N712AX. Have no idea who is doing RFD-STN. Could be us (which does make sense) but as I said we've only heard RFD-HNL and RFD-IWA-HNL down the road.

I hope it goes a lot smoother than our current flying with N712AX and Dynamic Airways.

Wonder how we got it over Ryan International though.....
Reply
Old 01-31-2012 | 06:23 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NCR757dxr
...I hope it goes a lot smoother than our current flying with N712AX and Dynamic Airways.
How so?
Reply
Old 02-05-2012 | 02:31 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lazyb757
How so?
With our half-assed flight planning software/resources and the customers, at times, almost impossible demands for payload out of SFB; it was really crappy to say the least.

For one thing we need more resources. There is no reason that a dispatcher should be forced to take over 1 1/2 hours to do an entire flight packet. All the clerical work takes away from the true job description. Tie that into no real "strategic planning" on tech stops...... we'd see at least one hour/two hour delays for paperwork alone.

If we had better resources I think we could really change our operation but what do I know...... we were terminated from the Dynamic contract on 29JAN anyway.

Jumping off now
Reply
Old 02-05-2012 | 05:16 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Talking

Originally Posted by NCR757dxr
With our half-assed flight planning software/resources and the customers, at times, almost impossible demands for payload out of SFB; it was really crappy to say the least.

For one thing we need more resources. There is no reason that a dispatcher should be forced to take over 1 1/2 hours to do an entire flight packet. All the clerical work takes away from the true job description. Tie that into no real "strategic planning" on tech stops...... we'd see at least one hour/two hour delays for paperwork alone.

If we had better resources I think we could really change our operation but what do I know...... we were terminated from the Dynamic contract on 29JAN anyway.

Jumping off now
But at least Uncle Joe has all the employee groups on the ropes.
Who cares about running the business efficiently?
It's fighting with labor that is truly important.
It detracts from the ineptitude of the management team
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
ryan1234
Hangar Talk
8
04-02-2010 09:08 AM
couchpotato
Part 135
16
02-10-2010 05:35 AM
covsting76
Military
11
01-14-2010 05:19 PM
hotshot
Hangar Talk
11
09-03-2007 10:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices