ATI To Fly for Mokulele?
01-27-2012, 03:17 PM
#1
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 51
ATI To Fly for Mokulele?
Lets see how long this lasts...
Mokulele’s Honolulu-Rockford-London Service is Really Happening | NYCAviation
Mokulele’s Honolulu-Rockford-London Service is Really Happening | NYCAviation
01-27-2012, 05:36 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,918
Originally Posted by Makai
Lets see how long this lasts...
Mokulele’s Honolulu-Rockford-London Service is Really Happening | NYCAviation
Mokulele’s Honolulu-Rockford-London Service is Really Happening | NYCAviation
Well good luck... especially if it puts pilot back in cockpit.
01-29-2012, 02:26 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
As far as we've all heard, ATI is only doing the RFD-HNL part with N712AX. Have no idea who is doing RFD-STN. Could be us (which does make sense) but as I said we've only heard RFD-HNL and RFD-IWA-HNL down the road.
I hope it goes a lot smoother than our current flying with N712AX and Dynamic Airways.
Wonder how we got it over Ryan International though.....
I hope it goes a lot smoother than our current flying with N712AX and Dynamic Airways.
Wonder how we got it over Ryan International though.....
02-05-2012, 02:31 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
Originally Posted by Lazyb757
How so? 
For one thing we need more resources. There is no reason that a dispatcher should be forced to take over 1 1/2 hours to do an entire flight packet. All the clerical work takes away from the true job description. Tie that into no real "strategic planning" on tech stops...... we'd see at least one hour/two hour delays for paperwork alone.
If we had better resources I think we could really change our operation but what do I know...... we were terminated from the Dynamic contract on 29JAN anyway.
Jumping off now
02-05-2012, 05:16 AM
#6
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 58
Originally Posted by NCR757dxr
With our half-assed flight planning software/resources and the customers, at times, almost impossible demands for payload out of SFB; it was really crappy to say the least.
For one thing we need more resources. There is no reason that a dispatcher should be forced to take over 1 1/2 hours to do an entire flight packet. All the clerical work takes away from the true job description. Tie that into no real "strategic planning" on tech stops...... we'd see at least one hour/two hour delays for paperwork alone.
If we had better resources I think we could really change our operation but what do I know...... we were terminated from the Dynamic contract on 29JAN anyway.
Jumping off now
For one thing we need more resources. There is no reason that a dispatcher should be forced to take over 1 1/2 hours to do an entire flight packet. All the clerical work takes away from the true job description. Tie that into no real "strategic planning" on tech stops...... we'd see at least one hour/two hour delays for paperwork alone.
If we had better resources I think we could really change our operation but what do I know...... we were terminated from the Dynamic contract on 29JAN anyway.
Jumping off now
Who cares about running the business efficiently?
It's fighting with labor that is truly important.
It detracts from the ineptitude of the management team
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
