Corporate to 121
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
#43
New Hire
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 6
Thanks. It's a good point; certainly no guarantee I would even be looked at if I did apply. I was a military pilot, but that was 10 years ago, and I am not sure how that is viewed in light of my current status as a corporate pilot.
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,213
Being able to check the military box can put you in the 35% of new hire applicant pool vs the 9% pure civilian OTS new hires.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Fixed wing military + civilian jet experience is usually a pretty good combo to get an invite. Any safety or leadership roles? If so, get your apps in - yesterday.
Early 40's? You'll have a great 2nd career*
*usual disclaimers about a 9/11-ish event, HR whims, age 75++ mando retirement, locusts, etc.
Early 40's? You'll have a great 2nd career*
*usual disclaimers about a 9/11-ish event, HR whims, age 75++ mando retirement, locusts, etc.
#48
New Hire
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 6
Thank you - I'd prefer not to post too many specifics as the Corp world is pretty small, but I do have military fixed wing experience and some 121 time.
I am somewhat familiar with the 121 life given previous experience. And as others have suggested there are goods and others to both. My current concerns are really around longevity in the corporate world and not wanting to move if I found it necessary to find another job. I was a commuter when I flew 121, and I don't necessarily want to go back to that, but it sure is nice to have the flexibility to do it if necessary/desired, and probably gets better with seniority (though I can't speak to that).
I enjoyed 121 flying, but the commuting and lack of seniority movement was what led me to look elsewhere; thus, if I tried to make a move back into 121 flying, I think my primary focus would be on going somewhere (major carrier) where i could get seniority quickest. Pay is also a driver, but it seems like most of the majors + FedEx/UPS are all paying top dollar. From retirement numbers, it seems AA and UPS would be the quickest route to seniority through retirements.
Please let me know if I should be thinking about this differently. Thanks.
I am somewhat familiar with the 121 life given previous experience. And as others have suggested there are goods and others to both. My current concerns are really around longevity in the corporate world and not wanting to move if I found it necessary to find another job. I was a commuter when I flew 121, and I don't necessarily want to go back to that, but it sure is nice to have the flexibility to do it if necessary/desired, and probably gets better with seniority (though I can't speak to that).
I enjoyed 121 flying, but the commuting and lack of seniority movement was what led me to look elsewhere; thus, if I tried to make a move back into 121 flying, I think my primary focus would be on going somewhere (major carrier) where i could get seniority quickest. Pay is also a driver, but it seems like most of the majors + FedEx/UPS are all paying top dollar. From retirement numbers, it seems AA and UPS would be the quickest route to seniority through retirements.
Please let me know if I should be thinking about this differently. Thanks.
#50
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: FO
Posts: 67
You sure about that? I’m just over 2 years at a legacy and I’m on track to be fairly close 220k the previous poster stated. I exceeded my corporate salary year 2, and I was NBAA top 25% flying a G450 as a captain when I left in 2015.
To those wondering about making the switch, it was a great decision for me. My family and I are much happier with the QOL change. I am not a commuter.
To those wondering about making the switch, it was a great decision for me. My family and I are much happier with the QOL change. I am not a commuter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post