Search

Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Part 91 and Polar Ops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2013 | 09:53 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UCLAbruins
i'm not going to argue with you, feel free to believe whatever you want

When you don't stop, you need 4 pilots (12+ hr flight). That means the front part of the cabin becomes a crew-rest area, so passengers loose half the cabin, and you loose that to gain 30 minutes by going slow non-stop vs going fast and stoping

My experience, 6+ years of flying Gulfstreams, passengers woud much rather go fast, and stop.... They also want to keep the cabin all to themselves. I just did one of those to tokyo

I've been going to FSI Savannah for the last 6 years, haven't met a single corporate pilot who's done a polar crossing, not one. But I'm sure they're outhere

Theres certainly a few out there that do NY-Asia/Russia.

We have done Fairbanks-Europe and it crosses just over Thule in Greenland. Not sure if thats a "polar" op but its no big deal really. Positioning a crew to Fairbanks is the PITA. PANC is much easier.

The city pairs have to work well, as its often the logistics of positioning a crew to some odd place thats the factor. Nobody wants to repo multiple legs, on Aeroflot etc.

Most Part 91 places I have seen also use 3 pilots up to 18hrs (then 24 off) I don't know any that carry 4. IMO it does not matter, all you wind up with when augmenting crews is 3-4 tired people anyhow. Its all a poor excuse for rest on a corporate jet and I'm all for full crew swaps at a tech stop....unfortunately it just doesn't work that way in the real world all the time.

I'm sure as legs get longer on the newest airplanes and with all the money in Asia and Russia this will become more of an issue....18hrs crammed into a business jet here we come..
Reply
Old 01-07-2013 | 04:10 PM
  #12  
RU4692's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Professional Monkey Trainer
Default

..........

Last edited by RU4692; 01-07-2013 at 04:21 PM.
Reply
Old 01-08-2013 | 07:00 PM
  #13  
landlover's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default

I've done PANC-ESMS part 91 in a G-IV. We had a few waypoints along 85N. There was some online training my company had me do that was pretty worthless.
Reply
Old 01-09-2013 | 02:18 AM
  #14  
UCLAbruins's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: F/O- G-V/550
Default

Originally Posted by landlover
I've done PANC-ESMS part 91 in a G-IV. We had a few waypoints along 85N. There was some online training my company had me do that was pretty worthless.
Let me guess, when you hit 69N go to "true" headings, and bring a sweater in case you go down
Reply
Old 01-09-2013 | 12:17 PM
  #15  
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Default

FWIW, at my airline, we had to do the following:

Carry two survival suits
Dispatch with enough fuel to make enroute alternates (think ETP calculations)
More restrictive MEL options
Calculate radiation exposure hazards (both short duration and accumulation over time)
Reply
Old 01-09-2013 | 07:13 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default

Behind the scenes, I'd bet there was a requirement to be able to scramble a backup plane to the divert airport in 12 to 24 hours as well.....
Reply
Old 01-10-2013 | 04:06 AM
  #17  
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Default

I think it's 48, but there is a requirement.


Originally Posted by billythekid
Behind the scenes, I'd bet there was a requirement to be able to scramble a backup plane to the divert airport in 12 to 24 hours as well.....
Reply
Old 01-11-2013 | 05:31 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: 320 F.O.
Default

Originally Posted by UCLAbruins
i'm not going to argue with you, feel free to believe whatever you want

When you don't stop, you need 4 pilots (12+ hr flight). That means the front part of the cabin becomes a crew-rest area, so passengers loose half the cabin, and you loose that to gain 30 minutes by going slow non-stop vs going fast and stoping

My experience, 6+ years of flying Gulfstreams, passengers woud much rather go fast, and stop.... They also want to keep the cabin all to themselves. I just did one of those to tokyo

I've been going to FSI Savannah for the last 6 years, haven't met a single corporate pilot who's done a polar crossing, not one. But I'm sure they're outhere
I have done two in my carrier. Both times three pilots part 91 Vny-Moscow and Vny-st Petersburg. Both in a G550 both times on a contract basis. (I was the third pilot). This flight dept does this 2 times a month both times going north of 80N. In the right equipment it is not a big deal most operators care about total flight time and don't want to stop. Would you rather fly 9 to kef. Then another 5 to Moscow or just knock it out in 12.5. My 10 years of flying Gulfstreams tells me the later.

Last edited by Climbto450; 01-11-2013 at 05:32 PM. Reason: Because I can't spell.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices