Search
Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Which Plane to Pick?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2015, 06:46 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F224's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: B757 Ca, Retired.
Posts: 195
Default

Hard to beat the TBM900 with five years of unlimited free maintenance when you buy a new one.
F224 is offline  
Old 11-01-2015, 08:27 PM
  #12  
Holiday Inn Silver Elite
 
MiGBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 158
Default

Originally Posted by SrfNFly227 View Post
Looking for advice on a new plane for the boss.
I have never, never ever met anyone who was sorry that they invested in a PC-12. I have worked for a couple different operators that had them, and they are loved loved loved. Charter market? Winner.
MiGBoy is offline  
Old 11-02-2015, 08:09 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Originally Posted by MiGBoy View Post
I have never, never ever met anyone who was sorry that they invested in a PC-12. I have worked for a couple different operators that had them, and they are loved loved loved. Charter market? Winner.
What do you know? You opinion isn't worth the paper it's written on!
RI830 is offline  
Old 11-02-2015, 04:37 PM
  #14  
Holiday Inn Silver Elite
 
MiGBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 158
Default

Originally Posted by RI830 View Post
What do you know? You opinion isn't worth the paper it's written on!
You will be punished for insulting the oracle!
MiGBoy is offline  
Old 11-02-2015, 07:06 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: FO
Posts: 627
Default

Already own the 601? Go with the Pilatus. For the mission it is perfect, although if it is a 1-2 person "commuter" the TBM might be a better fit, although with only slightly lower operating costs. The PC-12 opens up a lot of options. 45 vs 47 vs NG? It's a crapshoot. The extra 500 lbs on the 47 and NG is nice on longer legs where you need the gas but on shorter legs (1-2 hrs) the 45 is fine. GREAT charter potential.
Toonces is offline  
Old 11-03-2015, 08:22 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Originally Posted by MiGBoy View Post
You will be punished for insulting the oracle!
Ok Morpheous
RI830 is offline  
Old 11-04-2015, 06:12 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 473
Default

Which ever way you put it, two engines are better than one.
NoSidNoStar is offline  
Old 11-05-2015, 08:32 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Ave8tor218's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 81
Default

I've flown a few turbine aircraft, personally I have a soft spot for the Conquest II. Faster than a 200 Series King Air and fairly economical from what I understand (friend owns one and flies regularly).

Dare I mention an MU-2? Haha just kidding
Ave8tor218 is offline  
Old 11-09-2015, 08:04 PM
  #19  
Gettin paid to fly
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: BE-350
Posts: 172
Default

And why not an MU-2? Faster than almost anything with props hanging off it, good range and payload and I think nothing has it's ramp presence! Loud and proud and I think still factory supported AND you can get in one with a fully upgraded panel for around $1mil.
Learn that you don't fly it like a King Air in single engine scenarios and she won't bite you. I loved my time in the Marquise!
T45Heinous is offline  
Old 11-10-2015, 05:20 AM
  #20  
whatever
 
Vital Signs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 421
Default

"A quick look at the accident data on MU-2s shows that this airplane does have a higher than average accident rate. Bob Breiling (breilinginc.com) has been compiling and analyzing business turbine aircraft accidents since bizjets were introduced in the 1960s. According to the data he sent me, 27.7 percent of all MU-2s delivered have been involved in an accident. This accident rate is exceeded only by the Merlin series at 30.2 percent, but the MU-2 has a higher fatal accident rate."
Read more at http://www.flyingmag.com/safety

Over 25% is ridiculously high.
We are all glad you survived.
Vital Signs is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
1
11-02-2016 05:02 PM
EXPAT1
Foreign
6
04-16-2011 05:10 AM
covsting76
Hangar Talk
4
09-30-2009 09:20 PM
ryan1234
Hangar Talk
24
04-21-2009 04:46 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
0
04-14-2007 09:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices