![[Airline] Rebound Tied Directly To Vaccine](/iconimages/covid19/airline-rebound-tied-directly-vaccine_ltr.gif)
[Airline] Rebound Tied Directly To Vaccine
05-18-2020, 06:19 AM
#91
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Originally Posted by md11pilot11
Safety and adverse effects cannot be practically and comprehensively modeled (way too many possible ways something can interact in the human body), so in today's era I'd suspect that would be the riskier aspect of such a development. But they didn't mention any observed problems, and vaccines in general are not a complete mystery, so it's certainly very promising.
05-18-2020, 06:57 AM
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 324
Originally Posted by rickair7777
Safety and adverse effects cannot be practically and comprehensively modeled (way too many possible ways something can interact in the human body), so in today's era I'd suspect that would be the riskier aspect of such a development.
05-18-2020, 01:59 PM
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 564
Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yes and not really surprising. Computer modelling removes a lot of the trial and error aspect of developing a suitable active ingredient.
Safety and adverse effects cannot be practically and comprehensively modeled (way too many possible ways something can interact in the human body), so in today's era I'd suspect that would be the riskier aspect of such a development. But they didn't mention any observed problems, and vaccines in general are not a complete mystery, so it's certainly very promising.
Safety and adverse effects cannot be practically and comprehensively modeled (way too many possible ways something can interact in the human body), so in today's era I'd suspect that would be the riskier aspect of such a development. But they didn't mention any observed problems, and vaccines in general are not a complete mystery, so it's certainly very promising.
05-19-2020, 04:20 PM
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
From an Australian newspaper in ref to Qantas.
'Respected aviation intelligence firm CAPA - Centre for Aviation - has forecast the domestic market to return to 37 per cent capacity in early July, 49 per cent by the October school holidays and 60 per cent by mid-December.'
Perhaps a vaccine isn't needed.....
'Respected aviation intelligence firm CAPA - Centre for Aviation - has forecast the domestic market to return to 37 per cent capacity in early July, 49 per cent by the October school holidays and 60 per cent by mid-December.'
Perhaps a vaccine isn't needed.....
05-19-2020, 05:15 PM
#97
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 59
Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat
From an Australian newspaper in ref to Qantas.
'Respected aviation intelligence firm CAPA - Centre for Aviation - has forecast the domestic market to return to 37 per cent capacity in early July, 49 per cent by the October school holidays and 60 per cent by mid-December.'
Perhaps a vaccine isn't needed.....
'Respected aviation intelligence firm CAPA - Centre for Aviation - has forecast the domestic market to return to 37 per cent capacity in early July, 49 per cent by the October school holidays and 60 per cent by mid-December.'
Perhaps a vaccine isn't needed.....
05-20-2020, 06:41 AM
#99
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Originally Posted by Rightup
Those numbers would be an utter disaster for airlines
I'd take 60% right now if I could get it!
05-20-2020, 03:27 PM
#100
Perennial Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,501
Originally Posted by rickair7777
60% ish is probably cash-flow neutral for most domestic operations. With layoffs and other cost-cuts, they can survive indefinitely while waiting for better times.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
