Originally Posted by senecacaptain
(Post 3060226)
most ALL of these "we may have a vaccine soon" "news articles" garbage are press releases designed for hungry media to gobble up
it is clearly working We will win. |
Originally Posted by queue
(Post 3060099)
The new vaccine would be great provided:
As to the second, other than for those drafted into military service (hasn't happened since 'Nam), there is no precedent for mandatory vaccinations in the US. But businesses and government agencies can ban you from entering their buildings, planes, etc until you get vaccinated, have anti-bodies, or heard immunity is established one way or another. You have the right to not get vaccinated, they have a right to refuse service to those not taking reasonable precautions. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3053007)
Partial...May..
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3060174)
Looks like Moderna stage 1 was just hyped up. Scientists aren't see the data yet. Moderna stock tanking.
This doesn't mean they lied or misrepresented, just that they observed really good results and went to press before they finished all of the usual paperwork. Looks like the antibodies are present, in the right amounts, with no significant adverse effects. All good news, it's not an unreasonable assumption that those antibodies (same as those in recovered patients) will likely protect against covid. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3060281)
As to the second, other than for those drafted into military service (hasn't happened since 'Nam), there is no precedent for mandatory vaccinations in the US. Actually there are lots of such precedents. One, requiring smallpox vaccinations was appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court in 1905 who remanded it back to the Supreme Court of Massachusetts who eventually sustained the $5 fine levied against the scofflaw. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3060337)
Actually there are lots of such precedents. One, requiring smallpox vaccinations was appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court in 1905 who remanded it back to the Supreme Court of Massachusetts who eventually sustained the $5 fine levied against the scofflaw.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3060349)
Wasn't aware of that one but compulsory vax is no-go in the modern era in the US. Even if the law would allow, pols won't go there.
An excerpt from that opinion: https://i.ibb.co/dpNcbDR/4-D4-F3-B34...79141156-C.jpg lest we forget... |
Originally Posted by Black Warrior
(Post 3060276)
I actually don't have a problem with that in this instance. The average Karen Q Public doesn't take the time to wade through the BS to discern hype vs. reality, which is why we're in this mess to begin with. Hopefully Karen will hear the vaccine talk, even if some of it doesn't hold water, and her confidence will be boosted - resulting in a sooner return to air travel. Then all of her Karen Q friends, being the sheep they are, will feel confident in their ability to get out and do things as well.
We will win. There's never optimism or even just gratefulness for the positive aspects like the fact that children have been almost entirely spared, the risk of dying for under-40s is practically zero, and some facilities have made remarkable progress in treatment and outcomes. But even the slightest glimmer of hope about a vaccine gets everyone buzzing. It's particularly interesting because of the significant anti-vax segment of the population that exists. There's something magical about the concept of a vaccine for most people. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3060292)
The company went out on a limb a little bit releasing good news before all of the papers were published, signed, sealed, and delivered. But they are reputable, my guess is they observed enough in their professional expertise to feel comfortable with how the data will fall out.
This doesn't mean they lied or misrepresented, just that they observed really good results and went to press before they finished all of the usual paperwork. Looks like the antibodies are present, in the right amounts, with no significant adverse effects. All good news, it's not an unreasonable assumption that those antibodies (same as those in recovered patients) will likely protect against covid. |
Originally Posted by OpMidClimax
(Post 3061008)
Not sure you saw, the stock offering this week... plus a member of the board, now the vaccine czar... funny business and a little disappointing, but money is money...
There's always some of that in industries like biotech or tech, where the business model is sometimes to take a mighty (and expensive) swing, close your eyes at the last moment, and hope like hell that you hit it out of the park. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands