Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3216030)
I can't even be mad. I appreciate your honesty.
Edit: Hold up. There's more to it than this. If enough people die from disease, then society will break down. That breakdown poses a threat to your immediate family. Would you still prefer no mitigation and take your chances later in the Mad Max Thunderdome? Any credible scientist who studied Covid before the outbreak, says Covid will easily walk around the vaccines. So my question for you, is when do you give up, and live your life, wave 4, 20, 200? |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 3216039)
The only chance of Mad Max is if we get ADE from the vaccines.
Any credible scientist who studied Covid before the outbreak, says Covid will easily walk around the vaccines. So my question for you, is when do you give up, and live your life, wave 4, 20, 200? While post-apocalyptic is hyperbole, the fact remains that a lot of people dying at once is bad for business and society. And that will affect your family. So even after that, you're saying what the US has done is still not worth it? There's no justifying it unless one of your kids die from it? |
Hey, I am terrified to drive to work because the odds of a fatal car accident are astronomical. Everyone needs to pay me to not work because of the extreme risk. PAY UP MFers!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Air Stang 7
(Post 3216045)
Hey, I am terrified to drive to work because the odds of a fatal car accident are astronomical. Everyone needs to pay me to not work because of the extreme risk. PAY UP MFers!!!!
https://www.indeed.com/m/jobs?q=Remote+Work+From+Home |
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3216004)
I asked this at the beginning of the pandemic, I'll ask it again.
How many lives saved would it take to make shelter in place worth it to you? 1,000? 1,000,000? 1,000,000,000? We're all rational men and women. There has got to be a calculus where mitigation to save X lives is worth the temporary sacrifices and expenditures we've suffered. What's your number? |
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3216043)
I'm living my life now. I'm fully vaccinated, I mask up in public. I went to the beach yesterday.
While post-apocalyptic is hyperbole, the fact remains that a lot of people dying at once is bad for business and society. And that will affect your family. So even after that, you're saying what the US has done is still not worth it? There's no justifying it unless one of your kids die from it? |
Originally Posted by Air Stang 7
(Post 3216045)
Hey, I am terrified to drive to work because the odds of a fatal car accident are astronomical. Everyone needs to pay me to not work because of the extreme risk. PAY UP MFers!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Red Forman
(Post 3216051)
I wouldn’t call over a year temporary.
|
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3216054)
Is that what you said when your ex-wife asked for a "temporary" separation?
|
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3216048)
Here you go champ.
https://www.indeed.com/m/jobs?q=Remote+Work+From+Home |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 3216052)
I don't see anything wrong with protecting the vulnerable, and allowing the rest to continue on, you will probably say that won't work, but that's the same argument for why lockdowns don't work either.
And it probably is some threshold where you are personally starting to see the effects of the pandemic. |
Originally Posted by Air Stang 7
(Post 3216057)
Sorry, the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome is also very real and dangerous. I can't risk my health for a job. You're just going to have to pay me to not work. It's the safest thing to do. In fact, the CDC said so, there's no debate.
|
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3216058)
I'm saying there is number for everyone where people who oppose lockdowns will stop, reevaluate, and reverse their positions.
And it probably is some threshold where you are personally starting to see the effects of the pandemic. Quarantine the medical workers. Distribute vitamin D to the population. Put some of the population on Ivermectin if they want it. Wear as many masks as you want, because reducing stress has been shown to boost the immune system. Note, these are not cures for Covid once you get it, it only controls transmission. Mandates cause people to resist, and should not be implemented in any way. |
Originally Posted by Firefighterpilo
(Post 3216005)
Thats the point the lockdowns have ruined countless lives and saved a negligible if any amount. Lock downs have only worked to ruin people and help no one.
This was never going to be society killing disease like the plague in the 13th century. Then, Europe lost about 50% of the population, we GREW our population in this pandemic all the while greatly reducing health expenditures because no one was going for elective care. Loss of health care expenditures equaled half of the lost GDP in 2Q2020. |
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216060)
There ya go, buddy. https://dragon-speech.com/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI19_bnuvi7wIV9JFbCh0dqARXEAAYAiA AEgLBr_D_BwE
|
Originally Posted by Air Stang 7
(Post 3216069)
Speaking a lot causes my mouth to dry out and I don't want to contribute to global warming by drinking more water than normal. Eco anxiety also causes serious cardiac issues. Sorry, you're still going to need to pay for my existence and right to be safe.
Competition is a great motivator. |
Originally Posted by Air Stang 7
(Post 3216069)
Speaking a lot causes my mouth to dry out and I don't want to contribute to global warming by drinking more water than normal. Eco anxiety also causes serious cardiac issues. Sorry, you're still going to need to pay for my existence and right to be safe.
https://survivial-training.wonderhowto.com/how-to/purify-urine-for-drinking-with-emergency-solar-still-0116328/ Give me a tough one. |
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216082)
There ya go, buddy. Recycle!
https://survivial-training.wonderhowto.com/how-to/purify-urine-for-drinking-with-emergency-solar-still-0116328/ Give me a tough one. |
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3216078)
I see you're upping your troll game. Congrats.
Competition is a great motivator. |
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216053)
I think your sides argument is more, “I don’t care about who else might get hurt, I’m gonna chug this natty light and and then speed to hooters. Yeehaw.”
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by skywatch
(Post 3216189)
My argument is more like “let’s not borrow 20 trillion dollars from China (money we cannot hope to ever be able to payback - how will that work out?), destroy our children’s education and put them over a year behind by closing schools for no good reason, and destroy millions of small businesses to “flatten the curve” for a year (is it flat yet?) cause we are worried about a disease that is not much worse than the flu and overwhelming affects infirm, obese, 75 year old and up people living in nursing homes that will realistically die soon anyway. YeeHaw.
|
How many of those deaths were exclusively from COVID—perfectly healthy people who suddenly died of it? How many were stable people with comorbidity that died of COVID who would have had a life expectancy greater than one year? By age group? Until you break out the detail, of course, it’s terrible.
|
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 3216221)
How many of those deaths were exclusively from COVID—perfectly healthy people who suddenly died of it? How many were stable people with comorbidity that died of COVID who would have had a life expectancy greater than one year? By age group? Until you break out the detail, of course, it’s terrible.
|
Ok. Then why are total deaths insanely higher than previous years if it was all people that were going to die that year anyway?
|
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216229)
Ok. Then why are total deaths insanely higher than previous years if it was all people that were going to die that year anyway?
|
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216229)
Ok. Then why are total deaths insanely higher than previous years if it was all people that were going to die that year anyway?
|
Originally Posted by Desdi
(Post 3216249)
Question more appropriate would be (and wont be known until we look back) will be the graphs for 2022/23/24 and will those lines be below the pre covid lines. Did Covid take out a significant chunk of those that sadly would have met their demise from their underlying conditions/ advanced age in the next few years. Just food for thought.
|
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216256)
So do you predict half a million fewer than average deaths next year?
|
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216229)
Ok. Then why are total deaths insanely higher than previous years if it was all people that were going to die that year anyway?
|
Originally Posted by Red Forman
(Post 3216353)
I’ve said this many times now and no one has the guts to respond. I work for a very large life insurance company. In 2020 they did pay out a lot of COVID death claims, but when you compare past years they are paying out a normal amount of death claims. Literally the only difference is what column the cause of death goes into.
I trust cdc total deaths more than “I work in life insurance” |
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216357)
So.....all of those other people just didn’t die and there wasn’t greater than average mortality last year?
I trust cdc total deaths more than “I work in life insurance” |
Originally Posted by Red Forman
(Post 3216353)
I’ve said this many times now and no one has the guts to respond. I work for a very large life insurance company. In 2020 they did pay out a lot of COVID death claims, but when you compare past years they are paying out a normal amount of death claims. Literally the only difference is what column the cause of death goes into.
One of the biggest trolls of this website is suddenly serious and is asking us to take his word that an unnamed insurance company, of which he has observed anedotal data, hasn't seen a rise in death claims in 2020. Is that what I'm seeing? Because if so... HAHHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAHA! Okay. I got that out of my system. There are 100 reasons this could be false, namely the kind of people who can afford term life insurance aren't the ones dying from COVID. In any case, I'll believe the CDC numbers over anonymous internet trolls. Sorry. |
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3216360)
So let me get this straight...
One of the biggest trolls of this website is suddenly serious and is asking us to take his word that an unnamed insurance company, of which he has observed anedotal data, hasn't seen a rise in death claims in 2020. Is that what I'm seeing? Because if so... HAHHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAHA! Okay. I got that out of my system. There are 100 reasons this could be false, namely the kind of people who can afford term life insurance aren't the ones dying from COVID. In any case, I'll believe the CDC numbers over anonymous internet trolls. Sorry. |
Originally Posted by Red Forman
(Post 3216455)
Funny coming from the one that can only last a couple months before you get banned and come back under a new username, but I am the troll. Thanks for the laugh! You would think all life insurance companies would be taking it in the shorts, but they aren’t. A lot of them are publicly traded companies with the data out there, but you do you.
|
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216461)
So you are saying there are zero excess deaths? No more than any other year at all?
|
Originally Posted by FlewUnderWires
(Post 3216461)
So you are saying there are zero excess deaths? No more than any other year at all?
|
Originally Posted by Red Forman
(Post 3216799)
Nope, just a normal year for us and many other life insurance companies. In fact, every employee got a pay raise this year.
He’s right though about the trolling. |
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
(Post 3217122)
😂😂😂😂😂😂
He’s right though about the trolling. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands