Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Pfizer using children as a human shield >

Pfizer using children as a human shield

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Pfizer using children as a human shield

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2022, 09:35 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Default Pfizer using children as a human shield

https://dossier.substack.com/p/bait-and-switch-there-remains-no/comments
Summary:

1. The FDA approved version, Comirnaty, is not available in the USA.
​​​​​​
2. Pfizer is authorized to market their distinct EUA drug as Comirnaty, and it may have the same composition, but it is still sold and administered under the EUA.

3. Phizer will gain additional liability protection when Comirnaty is fully approved for children. Until that happens the EUA gives them better protection. They are only pushing the drug on kids as a way to reduce their liability for the fully approved drug.
fadec is offline  
Old 01-02-2022, 11:32 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

Seems like a real quality source of news
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 01-03-2022, 07:22 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
Seems like a real quality source of news
It is absolutely the path they are moving on.

To understand how this is all intertwined with hold harmless/liability/tort relief you need to go back to 1986. Specifically the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). The source is the Congressional Record and US Archives. You can go look at it there.

NCVIA was created ostensibly to act as a liability shield for pharmaceutical companies. In the 1970s they were getting the crap sued out of them and as a result many decided to exit the vaccine business all together. Congress sought a way to limit the amounts of awards from lawsuits and provide some level of protection and redress for the recipients of "mandated" vaccines while simultaneously shielding vaccine manufacturers so they wouldn't all jump out of producing vaccines.


NCVIA gave birth to VAERS. VAERS is codified in Law, I've told you and others this for months. Yet you chose to listen to the lies Maddow and CNN tell you. They don't want to tell you that VAERS is codified in Federal Law because that goes against the narrative that VAERS data is "fake, made up and non-vetted data". All of which is false. You need to read the NCVIA.

NCVIA also created, By Law, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and the National Vaccine Program Office. Trump nuked the National Vaccine Program office in 2019. So whats left is VAERS and NVICP.

More to follow on WHY the VAERS data must be policed and kept accurate. Hint: in order for the pharma companies to be afforded tort protections of NCVIA, they must comply with inquiries as to the veracity of the reports submitted in VAERS. Basically the numbers in VAERS have been agreed to by the pharma companies.
Drum is offline  
Old 01-03-2022, 08:45 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by Drum View Post
It is absolutely the path they are moving on.

To understand how this is all intertwined with hold harmless/liability/tort relief you need to go back to 1986. Specifically the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). The source is the Congressional Record and US Archives. You can go look at it there.

NCVIA was created ostensibly to act as a liability shield for pharmaceutical companies. In the 1970s they were getting the crap sued out of them and as a result many decided to exit the vaccine business all together. Congress sought a way to limit the amounts of awards from lawsuits and provide some level of protection and redress for the recipients of "mandated" vaccines while simultaneously shielding vaccine manufacturers so they wouldn't all jump out of producing vaccines.


NCVIA gave birth to VAERS. VAERS is codified in Law, I've told you and others this for months. Yet you chose to listen to the lies Maddow and CNN tell you. They don't want to tell you that VAERS is codified in Federal Law because that goes against the narrative that VAERS data is "fake, made up and non-vetted data". All of which is false. You need to read the NCVIA.

NCVIA also created, By Law, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and the National Vaccine Program Office. Trump nuked the National Vaccine Program office in 2019. So whats left is VAERS and NVICP.

More to follow on WHY the VAERS data must be policed and kept accurate. Hint: in order for the pharma companies to be afforded tort protections of NCVIA, they must comply with inquiries as to the veracity of the reports submitted in VAERS. Basically the numbers in VAERS have been agreed to by the pharma companies.
Is this you?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
conspiracy.jpg (74.5 KB, 217 views)
DropTank is offline  
Old 01-03-2022, 09:33 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by DropTank View Post
Is this you?
You can start here:

https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...ore-child-vac/

I gave you a source your type might "approve of" straight from the fact checkers at politifact.

Now as to the rest you can go read about the law here:

https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/f...cines-1517.pdf

Pulled out the salient parts of the Act so you don't have to read the 2000+ pages. Don't think your tiny brain could handle it.
Drum is offline  
Old 01-03-2022, 11:08 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by Drum View Post
You can start here:

https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...ore-child-vac/

I gave you a source your type might "approve of" straight from the fact checkers at politifact.

Now as to the rest you can go read about the law here:

https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/f...cines-1517.pdf

Pulled out the salient parts of the Act so you don't have to read the 2000+ pages. Don't think your tiny brain could handle it.
You left the part that Lizard Person Bill Gates is controlling you MIND!!!

It all started when our former president, who was born in Kenya.....

and then there was a pizza parlor pedo delivery service.
DropTank is offline  
Old 01-03-2022, 12:05 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by DropTank View Post
You left the part that Lizard Person Bill Gates is controlling you MIND!!!

It all started when our former president, who was born in Kenya.....

and then there was a pizza parlor pedo delivery service.
So typical and predictable of your type

When refuted and exposed to the facts and truth, you resort to play ground name calling and **** slinging

So mature.
Drum is offline  
Old 01-03-2022, 01:40 PM
  #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 24
Default

Originally Posted by fadec View Post
https://dossier.substack.com/p/bait-and-switch-there-remains-no/comments
Summary:

1. The FDA approved version, Comirnaty, is not available in the USA.
​​​​​​
2. Pfizer is authorized to market their distinct EUA drug as Comirnaty, and it may have the same composition, but it is still sold and administered under the EUA.

3. Phizer will gain additional liability protection when Comirnaty is fully approved for children. Until that happens the EUA gives them better protection. They are only pushing the drug on kids as a way to reduce their liability for the fully approved drug.
While I admit it is very easy to jump to conclusions - I'd be careful assuming intent. There is no disputing anything you said up until your last sentence, which may be true - but how do you know? I think that is what is so interesting about the recent interview on a certain podcast with Dr. Malone - he was very careful to never assume intent. Here's the facts. Here is what they did. These are the consequences. Absolutely ask the question though. Pfizer - are you pushing the EUA drugs now to avoid liability?

Last edited by Mordi; 01-03-2022 at 02:09 PM.
Mordi is offline  
Old 01-03-2022, 02:03 PM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 24
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
Seems like a real quality source of news
Back in my flight school days I had in internship working on a project that became super political... I still remember the direct supervisor of several of the guys in our office being quoted on national TV (CNN) wildly out of context and selectively edited to make it look like he was saying exactly opposite of what he was trying to say. Anyone who watched the live interview and then the commentary/highlights minutes later would have to have the short term memory of a goldfish to trust anything that was said. Being personally involved it left a pretty ugly impression. I've been wary of anything they've said ever since. Today its so hard to know who to trust - The first thing I look for in any article is their references. If it doesn't have a primary source its junk. If its interesting - I read their source material before getting worked up or sharing. The article FADEC quoted is backed by verifiable source material. Good enough for me!

Last edited by Mordi; 01-03-2022 at 02:14 PM.
Mordi is offline  
Old 01-03-2022, 02:37 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 414
Default

Originally Posted by DropTank View Post
You left the part that Lizard Person Bill Gates is controlling you MIND!!!

It all started when our former president, who was born in Kenya.....

and then there was a pizza parlor pedo delivery service.
Just keep burying that head of yours in the sand. Pharma is your friend and they are doing God's work. Some of you will believe anything the news "brought to you by Pfizer" tells you. Drum is speaking truth dummies. Wake the F up.
Nordhavn is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
clueless
Endeavor Air
1
02-19-2018 02:14 PM
SparkySmith
Delta
0
07-28-2016 04:11 PM
CaliPilot
Hangar Talk
6
09-13-2007 08:09 AM
fireman0174
Major
1
04-23-2006 10:26 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-07-2005 11:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices