Martin and DeRosa endorse Nestor and Rogers
05-08-2017, 11:01 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: C-17 IP
Posts: 143
Wow. This raises some serious questions. Based on past performance and contract giveaways, I'm inclined to vote opposite of what these guys want. Ugh. More of the same old man river, "we know what's best for you" games. No thanks. Payne and Archer got my vote.
05-08-2017, 11:45 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 173
Sam and Scott helped get us a TA that had 85% approval by the C44 pilots. They have the confidence of the C44 line pilots. They are our elected leadership and they are asking for our help in electing two F/O reps who would work well with them to advocate for the line pilots of C44. They want us to vote for Nestor and Rogers.
If you have already voted, and didn't vote for the candidates that Sam and Scott endorse, you can change your vote by logging on and casting your vote for a strong C44 and vote for Nestor and Rogers. We don't need a repeat of the Kerns/Johnson fiasco.
If you have already voted, and didn't vote for the candidates that Sam and Scott endorse, you can change your vote by logging on and casting your vote for a strong C44 and vote for Nestor and Rogers. We don't need a repeat of the Kerns/Johnson fiasco.
05-08-2017, 11:50 AM
#14
Rerouted On Weekends
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: 717A
Posts: 2,937
Originally Posted by Bradshaw24
Sam and Scott helped get us a TA that had 85% approval by the C44 pilots. They have the confidence of the C44 line pilots. They are our elected leadership and they are asking for our help in electing two F/O reps who would work well with them to advocate for the line pilots of C44. They want us to vote for Nestor and Rogers.
If you have already voted, and didn't vote for the candidates that Sam and Scott endorse, you can change your vote by logging on and casting your vote for a strong C44 and vote for Nestor and Rogers. We don't need a repeat of the Kerns/Johnson fiasco.
If you have already voted, and didn't vote for the candidates that Sam and Scott endorse, you can change your vote by logging on and casting your vote for a strong C44 and vote for Nestor and Rogers. We don't need a repeat of the Kerns/Johnson fiasco.
05-08-2017, 12:31 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 1,216
Originally Posted by Bradshaw24
If you have already voted, and didn't vote for the candidates that Sam and Scott endorse, you can change your vote by logging on and casting your vote for a strong C44 and vote for Nestor and Rogers. We don't need a repeat of the Kerns/Johnson fiasco.
05-08-2017, 12:36 PM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Up front
Posts: 962
Originally Posted by Bradshaw24
Sam and Scott helped get us a TA that had 85% approval by the C44 pilots. They have the confidence of the C44 line pilots. They are our elected leadership and they are asking for our help in electing two F/O reps who would work well with them to advocate for the line pilots of C44. They want us to vote for Nestor and Rogers.
If you have already voted, and didn't vote for the candidates that Sam and Scott endorse, you can change your vote by logging on and casting your vote for a strong C44 and vote for Nestor and Rogers. We don't need a repeat of the Kerns/Johnson fiasco.
If you have already voted, and didn't vote for the candidates that Sam and Scott endorse, you can change your vote by logging on and casting your vote for a strong C44 and vote for Nestor and Rogers. We don't need a repeat of the Kerns/Johnson fiasco.
