Airline Pilot Central Forums
14  54  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  74 
Page 64 of 97
Go to

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Side Hustle (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/113695-side-hustle.html)

LandGreen2 01-10-2021 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunfighter (Post 3179154)
I've been paper trading a 100k account on Think or Swim. The SPY & SPX Short Iron Condors got crushed this week. The short RMO double diagonal is holding up OK. I'm short FEB 15 put / 40 call and long May 12.5 put/ 45 call. On the plus side, my short FEB 230 Straddle on BRK/B is up $32.50. I started paper trading after Christmas and am down $2,792.50 overall. I'm keeping my day job a while longer.

As for the real money, the Feb TSLA calls are now ITM, so they are candidates to roll out and up as the extrinsic value decays closer to expiration. In staying true to my core competency, another passive share of an apartment community made its way into the portfolio. Were expecting 8% cash on cash, with a cash out refi in year 3-4. Another one from early 2020 is already planning for a 50% equity distribution from a supplemental loan in Q3 2021. We've been getting 6% CoC so far, and with half of our initial equity back, we will be getting 10-12% CoC and still retain our initial share of ownership. The cash out supplemental will fund part of another investment when we get it. Gotta keep the equity snowball rolling...

Help from the crowd please. Does Tradestation have the same nice red/green arrow, trade visualization graph that I see on the Tastytrade videos?

have any of you done a simple wheel strategy on one of those indexes. What has been your return?

gloopy 01-10-2021 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NuGuy (Post 3179415)
Yes, there was market "exuberance" over mortgage based securities, but the collapse of the real estate markets due to defaults on sub-prime lending wasn't what torched the world's economy. Yes, it was bad, but alone would have been just "Savings and Loan Crisis" bad.

Rather, it was the all the derivative products (the bets on bets, and bets on bets on bets), that truly magnified the result exponentially, and sank the whole world.

When I see crap being hawked on late night TV (gold, real estate, etc), that's my indication to exit the pattern.

Mostly agree. But to really identify what happened and why, in addition to the things you mentioned (all correct), we also have to look at foundational thing that contributed to the runups that the leverage was based on in the first place. Everything from numerous "community reinvestment acts" to mortgage interest deductions (massive subsidy to banks, huge boosts to malinvestment and wrecking ball destroyers of honest price discovery) all helped build that Tower of Rabble in the first place. Rather than allow values to settle to actual true market value that buyers could afford with fair and honest money, they went right back in and pumped them up with artificially low interest rates. That "helps" people "afford more house" which in turn drives up the prices of real estate.

Same thing with "education". Every cycle the people beg to help make it more affordable. So the lobby machine writes gifts for themselves like ever more financial aid, easier loans (even for extremely expensive joke degrees) and 529 tax scams, all of which help make the already artificlally expensive product even more expensive because the more they "help" the more expensive it gets and the more help you need because it keeps getting expensive, That's why colleges quickly started burying the money avalanche in as many little holes as they could; opulent new buildings and student centers with cafes and rock climbing walls and architecture and landscaping that rivals where the 0.1% live. Hiring mutipiles of fake make-work admin jobs (often from poorly performing educators and/ or idealogically minded outsiders) than actual teachers. Meanwhile as the speed of information became instant and the cost of delivery of it nearly free, "education" costs went nuts.

Both education and real estate are massive bubbles and no politician on either pretend side will ever allow either to be fixed in a sustainable way. They'll just keep pumping til they pop then hope they can bail it out.

Gunfighter 01-10-2021 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 3179748)
Both education and real estate are massive bubbles and no politician on either pretend side will ever allow either to be fixed in a sustainable way. They'll just keep pumping til they pop then hope they can bail it out.

You've identified one more reason to own income producing real estate. The taxpayer will bail you out. Don't hate the player...

Reasons to own income producing real estate.
1. Indexed to inflation. With leverage, you actually profit from inflation.
2. The inflationary bias of central banks and the federal government create powerful allies.
3. The government subsidizes the investment through the tax code by allowing depreciation on an appreciating asset.
4. If the entire market goes in the tank, they will try their hardest to bail you out.

Ways to make money with real estate and pay less in taxes.
1. Equity capture through value add properties. Preferably via contractor sweat equity vs your own.
2. Cash flow from rent exceeding expenses and debt service.
3. Principle reduction through amortization.
4. Appreciation on the asset, that could be multiplied with smart leverage.
5. Tax savings through depreciation and possibly tax deferred exchanges.


Neither education or cost of housing will get solved until lawmakers address the constrained supply. Fees and regulations surround development of new housing ensure that affordable housing won't be built. Embracing technology as a method of distributing education is a great start on that avenue. Adding "free money" just makes it more expensive.

Gunfighter 01-13-2021 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunfighter (Post 3179154)
I've been paper trading a 100k account on Think or Swim. The SPY & SPX Short Iron Condors got crushed this week. The short RMO double diagonal is holding up OK. I'm short FEB 15 put / 40 call and long May 12.5 put/ 45 call. On the plus side, my short FEB 230 Straddle on BRK/B is up $32.50. I started paper trading after Christmas and am down $2,792.50 overall. I'm keeping my day job a while longer.

After today's close, I'm up $2,500 overall, which is a swing of $5,000 from last week. That seems like a pretty wild swing for less than a week of activity in a 100K account. I thought I was playing fairly conservative with a few short SPY/SPX IC trades at 30/16 Delta with VIX >24 and 15/10 Delta trades when VIX was lower.

Is a 5% weekly swing normal for you option traders? Should I be trying something else to smooth out the swings?

Milk Man 01-13-2021 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunfighter (Post 3181061)
After today's close, I'm up $2,500 overall, which is a swing of $5,000 from last week. That seems like a pretty wild swing for less than a week of activity in a 100K account. I thought I was playing fairly conservative with a few short SPY/SPX IC trades at 30/16 Delta with VIX >24 and 15/10 Delta trades when VIX was lower.

Is a 5% weekly swing normal for you option traders? Should I be trying something else to smooth out the swings?

yeah give me some, i’ll smooth it out for ya. 1’s across the floor.

Gunfighter 01-16-2021 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Milk Man (Post 3181116)
yeah give me some, i’ll smooth it out for ya. 1’s across the floor.

​​​​​​It's all play money on ToS. They have a paper trading feature on the platform. It has a 100K margin account and a 100K IRA. Trading rules vary by account type. It's a great tool for learning trade entry, management and exit. Play with $200k and still sleep at night.

gloopy 01-18-2021 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunfighter (Post 3179803)
You've identified one more reason to own income producing real estate. The taxpayer will bail you out. Don't hate the player...

Sound logic and I agree with it. However we can't discount the progressively increasing assault on "the rich" which is increasingly defined as anyone who makes more than whoever is voting on it (the truly rich seem to only get richer). Look at the student loan "forgiveness" and especially the populist left "cancel rent" initiatives. If you own someone else's place, that's their entitlement, and best case you're just a modern day kulak.

Small businesses and rental incoome properties were alwasy two of the best ways for people to work themselves up the ladder. Both of those things are squarely in the crosshairs of the statists now and all trends point to that only getting worse.

I agree that its a good idea. But the attacks on it have only just begun, and I wonder how much longer it will be a good deal or a path up the ladder.

Bucking Bar 01-19-2021 10:19 AM

Is "whistleblower" a legit side gig?

Bucking Bar 01-19-2021 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NuGuy (Post 3179415)
Rather, it was the all the derivative products (the bets on bets, and bets on bets on bets), that truly magnified the result exponentially, and sank the whole world.

Impressed that you get that part of the puzzle. Just to continue the conversation I reply, "Did it? Really? Or did a chosen few get very rich with no basis in law (or common sense) for what happened?

Would the world have sank if Goldman Sachs only made a 200% profit on reselling CDO coverage it got from AIG for $0.0004 per dollar instead of whatever the rate of return is going from $0.0002 to $1? Micheal Lewis (author of the Big Short) figured it out after he wrote his book. Let me try to explain it here.

From 2004 to 2007 mostly Wall Street players underwrote several trillion of sub-prime loans. To peddle this garbage off they made it look better by underwriting it with insurance against default. The insurance was priced at about two basis points per dollar. Later, rates were increased to 4 basis points, then as high as seven. Goldman Sachs and other big investment banks positioned themselves as brokers of this "insurance" marking it up 400% to its customers.

Insurance is 100%-total-profit, when you sell it, ** IF ** you do not have a loss. Yes, there are administrative expenses and reinsurance costs if you peddle the risk off to someone else (like say some rich prince in the Saudia Arabia (who will never f'n pay you)). If you multiply 450 billion of yearly coverage by $0.0004 that's $180 million for the sixteen or so managers of AIG FP (Financial Products) and $720 million for the Goldman boys. They were doing this on an annual basis and it grew from that $450bn snapshot.

In the Big Short people observed this absurdly underpriced insurance and began to place bets on having a loss. The amazing deal was on the retail level, Goldman was pricing this stuff at about 16 basis points, but the loss paid out $1. You can't get that kind of payoff in Vegas.

Buying an insurance policy usually requires an "insurable interest." For example, I could not buy insurance on your mother's life because it does not affect me if something were to happen to her; I have no skin in the game. As a matter of public policy, we do not want insurance companies to be gambling houses. However, both political parties have gone along with deregulation in the name of profits.

Typically when this kind of thing happens the Insurer (underwriter) declares bankruptcy and offers something like ten cents on the dollar of coverage. Those who had placed their bets would have still received a $0.10 return for every $0.0016 invested, which is huge. Anyone with any sense wonders why not let Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and Goldman handle this like any other bankruptcy with investors taking haircuts, as they damn well should? Maybe we should look at the resumes of those involved in engineering the bail out starting with the chief architect of the thing:

Hank Paulson: CEO of Goldman. Wiki notes "Before becoming Treasury Secretary, he was required to liquidate all of his stock holdings in Goldman Sachs, valued at over $600 million in 2006, in order to comply with conflict-of-interest regulations.[17] Because of a tax provision passed under President George H.W. Bush, Paulson was not subject to capital gains tax. This saved him between $36 and $50 million in taxes.[18]"

So yeah, there's that. Love Mr. Lewis. He got closer than most writers to figuring this mess out.

Further reading https://haraldhau.com/The_Man_Who_Crashed_the_World.pdf

rickair7777 01-19-2021 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 3183423)
Is "whistleblower" a legit side gig?

It can be...

https://www.phillipsandcohen.com/whistleblower-rewards/


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 PM.
14  54  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  74 
Page 64 of 97
Go to


Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands