Lost Retirements
#41
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Not true. The 16% DC can easily be reduced/cut and our pay rates can easily be cut again.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 49
Ill be honest, Im very much against any pension due to the fears many have previously posted. Ill bite though and ask those of you who believe we should get one, please explain what exactly you would like to see, how you would to see it rolled out, and what would you be willing to sacrifice for it? Im only assuming that if this passed the company would remove our 401K DC and make it at best a "typical 401K" and have some kind of basic % match.
Im honestly trying to see what bullet points (preferably more comprehensive) you all have in favor of such an idea. Its easy in my opinion to complain about what were leaving on the table but I and Im sure others would like to hear specifics. The devil is in the details and the details matter.
Im honestly trying to see what bullet points (preferably more comprehensive) you all have in favor of such an idea. Its easy in my opinion to complain about what were leaving on the table but I and Im sure others would like to hear specifics. The devil is in the details and the details matter.
Hopefully the MEC understands how divisive a"pension" would be. I don't think they are talking about a DB as that is off the table due to PBGC laws(my understanding)
What I would like to see is an increase to the DC if
any excess (above 415C) can be used to avoid taxes ie. an annuity comes to mind. Otherwise an increase in DC helps the less senior more than the more senior because the DC excess comes in the form of straight pay and taxes take 45%(min) of the "benefit"....39% federal, 2% ALPA dues, 4% Obamacare tax above 200k, now tack on state tax of 10% and you are at 55% lost due to transaction fees. Whereas the young guys can choose to shield all of the income from taxes an get $1 benefit for $1 negotiated
#43
Originally Posted by 4fans
The FedEx guys seem to be working on an actual plan.
The “variable benefit” plan currently being discussed at FDX would replace their current defined benefit, and while it is considered a DB plan has funding elements not unlike a DC for a corporation.
There’s also a “flat dollar benefit” DB plan, which is what UPS has, which also has funding elements lowering a corporation’s burden.
Pro/Con to both.
Worth noting in addition to FedEx’s 2% FAE defined benefit (130k cap) and the UPS FDA defined benefit (120k cap), both companies also have a DC plan (8% soon 9% and 12%, respectively).
Lots o’ ways to skin the retirement cat.
Back to my dirty freight dog sandbox...
#44
How do you know he won't have to adjust anything? Can you see the future? Yes, times are good now, but just as it has been in the past one's actual career probably won't look anything like one had imagined it would.
Sure 401k is in our name now, but it doesn't mean a secure retirement or lucrative career is guaranteed.
Sure 401k is in our name now, but it doesn't mean a secure retirement or lucrative career is guaranteed.
I just can’t help it.....
Anyone who really and truly believes what you wrote, and I bolded, should be all onboard with developing another type of retirement income stream. I think you are right! It’s not guaranteed. Hasn’t there also been talk by some in Congress about the Federal Government taking over 401k’s? I know that’s rather radical but who knows what will happen in 20+ years.
Denny
#45
Hopefully the MEC understands how divisive a"pension" would be. I don't think they are talking about a DB as that is off the table due to PBGC laws(my understanding)
What I would like to see is an increase to the DC if
any excess (above 415C) can be used to avoid taxes ie. an annuity comes to mind. Otherwise an increase in DC helps the less senior more than the more senior because the DC excess comes in the form of straight pay and taxes take 45%(min) of the "benefit"....39% federal, 2% ALPA dues, 4% Obamacare tax above 200k, now tack on state tax of 10% and you are at 55% lost due to transaction fees. Whereas the young guys can choose to shield all of the income from taxes an get $1 benefit for $1 negotiated
What I would like to see is an increase to the DC if
any excess (above 415C) can be used to avoid taxes ie. an annuity comes to mind. Otherwise an increase in DC helps the less senior more than the more senior because the DC excess comes in the form of straight pay and taxes take 45%(min) of the "benefit"....39% federal, 2% ALPA dues, 4% Obamacare tax above 200k, now tack on state tax of 10% and you are at 55% lost due to transaction fees. Whereas the young guys can choose to shield all of the income from taxes an get $1 benefit for $1 negotiated
The top marginal tax bracket is 37%, not 39% and that is for taxable income above 600k (married) 500k (single). Few pilots, even widebody captains will fall into this range. 400-600 of taxable income is taxed at 37%. If you are 315-400k, the marginal rate is only 32%. Keep in mind, we are talking about the marginal rate on taxable income. If you are making 450K per year as a captain, your taxable income after deductions is most likely in the 315-400 range at 32%.
Secondly, you are mis-applying the 3.8% Obamacare surtax. It is a tax on net investment income, not W-2 income.
Again, the concept is valid, but the amount lost to taxes is closer to 45% not 55%. With that tax penalty in mind, I agree we should be looking for a method of increasing retirement benefits in a tax efficient manner.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,148
Likes: 113
You think you'll live to 95?
And here's 30 seconds of research to show that even $770K is a first world 'problem'.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/07/how-...every-age.html
And here's 30 seconds of research to show that even $770K is a first world 'problem'.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/07/how-...every-age.html
#47
[/B]
I just can’t help it.....
Anyone who really and truly believes what you wrote, and I bolded, should be all onboard with developing another type of retirement income stream. I think you are right! It’s not guaranteed. Hasn’t there also been talk by some in Congress about the Federal Government taking over 401k’s? I know that’s rather radical but who knows what will happen in 20+ years.
Denny
I just can’t help it.....
Anyone who really and truly believes what you wrote, and I bolded, should be all onboard with developing another type of retirement income stream. I think you are right! It’s not guaranteed. Hasn’t there also been talk by some in Congress about the Federal Government taking over 401k’s? I know that’s rather radical but who knows what will happen in 20+ years.
Denny
#48
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Let’s not forget the real elephant in the room with 401k’s. The traditional 401k v Roth, is the real killer imo. I’ve done all I can to put away as much as I can into the Roth portions my entire career. ( yes one day soon I’ll hit that limit and won’t qualify anymore). The clowns in D.C will eventually realize that all these social programs will require more and more of our money to fund that disaster. So yes as a mid 30’s guy I’m fairly sure they will tax that at significantly higher rates than we think in present day. Don’t forget before Reagan we had as high as 90% taxes on some income brackets and I won’t be surprised if that comes to fruition one day. Our liabilities are the “real no joke” looming U.S. crisis and were just acting like it’s not a problem.
...ok and I’ll take my tin foil hat off and back to the retirement discussion
...ok and I’ll take my tin foil hat off and back to the retirement discussion
#49
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 49
I agree the concept of your post. Let's get the numbers correct before we build on this argument though.
The top marginal tax bracket is 37%, not 39% and that is for taxable income above 600k (married) 500k (single). Few pilots, even widebody captains will fall into this range. 400-600 of taxable income is taxed at 37%. If you are 315-400k, the marginal rate is only 32%. Keep in mind, we are talking about the marginal rate on taxable income. If you are making 450K per year as a captain, your taxable income after deductions is most likely in the 315-400 range at 32%.
Secondly, you are mis-applying the 3.8% Obamacare surtax. It is a tax on net investment income, not W-2 income.
Again, the concept is valid, but the amount lost to taxes is closer to 45% not 55%. With that tax penalty in mind, I agree we should be looking for a method of increasing retirement benefits in a tax efficient manner.
The top marginal tax bracket is 37%, not 39% and that is for taxable income above 600k (married) 500k (single). Few pilots, even widebody captains will fall into this range. 400-600 of taxable income is taxed at 37%. If you are 315-400k, the marginal rate is only 32%. Keep in mind, we are talking about the marginal rate on taxable income. If you are making 450K per year as a captain, your taxable income after deductions is most likely in the 315-400 range at 32%.
Secondly, you are mis-applying the 3.8% Obamacare surtax. It is a tax on net investment income, not W-2 income.
Again, the concept is valid, but the amount lost to taxes is closer to 45% not 55%. With that tax penalty in mind, I agree we should be looking for a method of increasing retirement benefits in a tax efficient manner.
"How much is the federal income tax rate?
In 2017, the income limits for all tax brackets and all filers will be adjusted for inflation and will be as follows (Table 1). The top marginal income tax rate of 39.6 percent will hit taxpayers with taxable income of $418,400 and higher for single filers and $470,700 and higher for married couples filing jointly.
Yea....hit that 39.6% incremental rate. I know rates are coming down this year
Additionally, there is an Obama care tax of .9% on all income over 200/ 250k (single/married) and you are correct about the 4%....and truth in advertising it is not 2%ALPA dues... but close....wat? 1.6....1.7...1.8....oh eff it, close enough to 2%.... even on the DC excess
With AMT I can unequivocally say "my butt is bloody"....I take home less than 50% of each additional dollar earned
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



