Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 2703160)

Anyone working in this industry whining about paychecks not being the exact same month after month, or pay stubs being"too complex" should probably rethink priorities in life. Talk about first world problems. Sheesh

Originally Posted by crewdawg (Post 2703174)

I took his post as sarcasm or TIC...maybe I'm off the mark on that one.

Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2703212)

Settling and double standard. This experience isn't acceptable for a customer why would we say its OK? I'm not wasting my energy or negotiating capital on Delta just doing the right thing though. They can manage their own internal "brand." Just sad that we don't rate a fair system. So be it, the perception diminishes a little with every occurrence. And yes they are trying to screw you, prove me wrong. The fix is long overdue, intentionally.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2703228)

I have been here over 32 years. Never had a pay issue with the exception of 1 error on non
revenue charges when we did not get on the flight and were charged. You claim they are intentionally messing up pay. The only pilot complaint I have heard from other pilots about pay related to retirement contributions returning from mil leave. Overall the pay system seems to be functioning at a very high level. How often is your pay screwed up?

Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2703232)

Then the errors don't exist, right? Because you say they don't and it hasn't happened to you. High level? That's a laugh ask the ALPA scheduling committee how much extra pay they have recovered.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2703235)

You are talking two different things. One is errors in scheduling and one is payroll errors. I have freely acknowledged and posted that scheduling is making numerous errors in trip assignments. Again I ask how many errors have been in your paycheck calculations? That was what this discussion is about.

Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 2703175)

I did not...but maybe I'm the one off the mark.

Originally Posted by FogSkier (Post 2700375)

Somebody mentioned the Min day with the 30 hour layovers again.

We have 30 hour layovers because the RON airplane doesn’t sit long enough to make legal rest and there is not a midday service on the right airplane type to swap the crew out.

A min day will not solve that problem. It MIGHT make deadheading crew in and out more common than sitting for 30.

It WILL have other unintended consequences.....I just hope that people run the solutions and see what the trips actually look like before we go down this road.

What i’d like to see is getting the ADG up a bit higher and some language to ensure a degree of RCC input on the rotations before changing philosophies altogether.

Originally Posted by Farmlover (Post 2703745)

It would be nice to get paid for that 30hr sit tho.
These 3days with a 30 hr sit and sitting for free isn't fun.
Min day would help.