![]() |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2712713)
Agreed, and I don't think they will try to get a thousand more 50 seaters allowed. But precisely because DCI is on the decline, they may indeed attempt to get top end relief even as it inevitably shrinks overall anyway.
More 70's or 76's, and/or a MGW limit or something like that may worm its way into an offer to us. If it doesn't happen then great. If it does we shouldn't even entertain it. Scoop |
The opener needs to recover SCOPE. Then maybe we have a chance at maintaining SCOPE or even some slight recovery. We are acquiescing if we don’t ask for recovery.
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2712713)
Agreed, and I don't think they will try to get a thousand more 50 seaters allowed. But precisely because DCI is on the decline, they may indeed attempt to get top end relief even as it inevitably shrinks overall anyway.
More 70's or 76's, and/or a MGW limit or something like that may worm its way into an offer to us. If it doesn't happen then great. If it does we shouldn't even entertain it. |
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2712869)
In your previous post, I assumed you meant JV scope.
|
I think the Scope side of negotiations is gonna be about JV Scope. In particular about Aero Mexico, Westjet, and Korean Air.
Denny |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 2712894)
I think the Scope side of negotiations is gonna be about JV Scope. In particular about Aero Mexico, Westjet, and Korean Air.
Denny |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 2712821)
The opener needs to recover SCOPE. Then maybe we have a chance at maintaining SCOPE or even some slight recovery. We are acquiescing if we don’t ask for recovery.
|
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 2712894)
I think the Scope side of negotiations is gonna be about JV Scope. In particular about Aero Mexico, Westjet, and Korean Air.
Denny I agree. We’ve been working on AeroMexico by itself for about 2 years now. Both sides share blame for that. When you add the other JVs and a full Section 6 with work rule and retirement issues, I have no reason to believe there will be any deal achieved for several years, despite gzsg’s optimism. |
Originally Posted by Hillbilly
(Post 2713132)
I agree. We’ve been working on AeroMexico by itself for about 2 years now. Both sides share blame for that. When you add the other JVs and a full Section 6 with work rule and retirement issues, I have no reason to believe there will be any deal achieved for several years, despite gzsg’s optimism.
|
Originally Posted by Planetrain
(Post 2712901)
Not trying to be picky, but I noticed the MEC chair capitalized SCOPE too in his comm. Is that a NW thing? Truly just wondering where this started. (Asking for a friend who works at the grammar police.)
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:02 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands